| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iran |
| Iran ’Studying’ Uranium Enrichment Halt |
| 2003-10-26 |
| Iran said Sunday it had not yet suspended enriching uranium after promising to do so in a deal with three European countries who had come to Tehran to express international concerns it is pursuing nuclear weapons. Show of hands by everyone who is surprised by this... thought so... "Iran is currently studying suspending uranium enrichment," the Foreign Ministry said in a brief statement, saying its spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi had been mistaken when he told reporters earlier Sunday that enrichment had already been suspended. "We’ve discovered that it’s easier to enrich the uranium if it’s suspended... Oh, you thought we meant something different? Sorry Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. High-grade enriched uranium can be used in bombs, while low-grade enriched uranium can be used in energy programs. "High-grade uranium is more efficient to transport -- we intend to dilute it on-site with camel dung." In an agreement with the British, German and French foreign ministers, Iranian authorities said Tuesday they would suspend uranium enrichment and sign a protocol giving inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (search), the U.N. nuclear watchdog, unfettered access to its nuclear facilities. but they had their fingers crossed... Iran had said it would abide by the protocol even before it is ratified by its parliament. But Tehran has been vague about when it would open up to inspections, as it has been vague about when and for how long it would halt enrichment. It’s also a bit vague about the honest signing of agreements, but entirely clear on the concept of asshattery... Iran has previously allowed IAEA inspectors to visit non-nuclear sites, a privilege that goes beyond Iran’s obligations under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. ?WTF? What’s the point of "allowing" the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit non-nuclear sites???? IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei said earlier this month that agency inspectors were allowed to visit one military site and that there could be expanded reviews of both military and civilian facilities in the future. Iranian officials are trying to balance pressure to meet the demands of the international community with the demands of hard-liners at home. About 1,500 hard-liners protested in Tehran on Friday against the pledge to open the nuclear program to unfettered inspections and suspend uranium enrichment. Some Iranian extremists see backing down on the nuclear question as a sign of weakness. It is... Iran, you’re weak -- get used to the idea... On Sunday, as Asefi was addressing the press conference at the Foreign Ministry, over two dozen clerics demonstrated outside the building to protest Iran’s pledge. "No compromise, no surrender. Death to compromisers," shouted the clerics, some of them wearing white shrouds symbolizing their readiness to die for their cause. Asked to die, the clerics refused... Asked about the protests, Asefi said, "We are the 81st country agreeing to sign the additional protocol. It’s not treason or compromise. It was necessary to do so." Made particularly easy by the fact that we have called takebacks... Iran faces an Oct. 31 deadline to prove to the IAEA that its nuclear projects are entirely peaceful. If Iran fails to satisfy the IAEA, the U.N. agency is expected to refer the matter to the Security Council, which could impose sanctions. Or it might not, or it might and might or might not enforce them -- the head spins with the possibilities... In the agreement, France, Britain and Germany promised in turn to help Iran acquire peaceful nuclear technology. Defined as "that nuclear technology which earns them money and oil" Iran gave the U.N. nuclear watchdog a dossier Thursday meant to dispel fears it is trying to make atomic bombs. Asefi said the dossier was a 200-page account of Iran’s nuclear activities. The spokesman said a team of IAEA experts arrived in Tehran Sunday to discuss the dossier with Iranian authorities. He gave no further details. My fears would be more dispelled if this dossier was a 5 page complete accounting of Iran’s lack of nuclear activities. |
| Posted by:snellenr |
| #6 NMM, I've been saying that for months! Thank you. What part of the scenario of an Islamist Bomb and a nuclear "watchdog" named Mohammed going together don't the sheeple understand? |
| Posted by: Jennie Taliaferro 2003-10-27 1:17:57 PM |
| #5 Yup Kalle I trust a man with a name like El-Baradei to police nuclear proliferation in the Arab world--NOT--anyone else agree? |
| Posted by: NotMikeMoore 2003-10-26 11:36:26 PM |
| #4 The IAEA's El-Baradei was "passively" helping Saddam to hide his nuke effort. By the standard of what he did for Saddam, he "succeeded" in NoKorea. He is now doing the exact same thing with Iran. Blix was an obvious, anti-American fool much discussed in the media and blog-world. El-Baradei is an anti-American fool who --inexplicably and unlike Blix-- hasn't been dissected in public. He is always lying though his teeth and must be taken out before he can do further damage under cover of the IAEA. |
| Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever) 2003-10-26 5:21:04 PM |
| #3 Iran gave the U.N. nuclear watchdog a dossier Thursday meant to dispel fears it is trying to make atomic bombs. Sitting on top of a fortune in oil, and these guys want nuclear power? They're full of crap, plain and simple. And the Poms, Frogs, and Germans are stupid to be helping them out. |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2003-10-26 2:06:14 PM |
| #2 "Iranian officials are trying to balance pressure to meet the demands of the international community with the demands of hard-liners at home. About 1,500 hard-liners protested in Tehran on Friday against the pledge to open the nuclear program to unfettered inspections and suspend uranium enrichment." Who is this reporter trying to kid? The "hard-liners" are the Iranian "officials" and, in a totalitarian state, any demonstration that isn't busted up by the thugs of state is, ipso facto, one representing the state's position. Fox needs to get a grip on the editorial process and remove the innuendo and spin. Of course, there wouldn't be much of a story here if it was limited solely to facts: "Nope. We're clean. C'mon in. Visit our non-nuke sites and see for yerself." "Wow! You're so, uh, cooperative! Let's give 'em a medal!" "Tanx. It's rough. You can see our citizens clamor for this technology. They want to wipe out -30- About a half column inch, I'd say. |
| Posted by: .com 2003-10-26 12:11:49 PM |
| #1 I beleive that we have entered the Zero Sum Endgame once again. |
| Posted by: Super Hose 2003-10-26 11:26:44 AM |