| Submit your comments on this article |
| Korea |
| KCNA Refutes Bush’s Remarks |
| 2003-10-29 |
| U.S. President Bush was reported to let loose vituperation against the DPRK in an interview in the plane on Oct. 22 when flying for Australia after his Indonesia visit. He was so reckless as to describe its top leader as a "dictator" and express "loathing" for him. So, what’s your point? The reported outbursts are touching off bitter indignation of all the Korean people and servicepersons of the People’s Army as they are unpardonable remarks undisguisedly revealing his habitual rejection of the DPRK’s supreme headquarters and social system. They’re bitter, dammit! If Bush actually said so, it would prove that his earlier remarks listing the DPRK as part of an "axis of evil" and a "target of its preemptive nuclear attack" still remain the core of the U.S. policy toward the DPRK. Yes, that’s the prevailing opinion. Bush talked about giving "written security assurances" to the DPRK and seeking a "peaceful settlement of the issue through dialogue". As if he had said nothing, he continued hurling mud at the DPRK. This suggests that he lacks qualification as a politician and his remarks about the "written security assurances" to the DPRK were not prompted by his true intention to settle the problem. "Mud hurling" bastard! The Bush administration’s loudmouthed "concession" and "peaceful settlement" are, in the final analysis, nothing but a sleight of hand to win in the next presidential election. This goes to prove that the U.S. does not seek to co-exist with the DPRK by finding a solution to the issue but disarm it and overthrow its political system. Oh-oh. They’re catching on... Bush claims to be president of the world’s only superpower. But his disqualification as a politician finds an expression in that he has no elementary way of thinking to analyze the issue. They must be getting Peter Jennings again on cable... As far as the DPRK’s economic problem touted by Bush is concerned, it arose because the U.S. has pursued a hostile policy toward the DPRK for over half a century, imposing harsh economic sanctions against the DPRK and posing a grave threat to the existence of the Korean people and creating difficulties in their way. I thought they didn’t have economic problems? I thought it was a friggin’ Workers Paradise up there? Bush, however, said nothing of the U.S. crimes committed against the DPRK but attributed what he called "starvation" to the DPRK’s supreme headquarters. This is unjustifiable and intolerable. ...and true. The world knows many political leaders. But it is only leader Kim Jong Il who gives field guidance day and night to solve the problem of people’s living. ...and a helluva job he’s doing. It is an anachronistic and foolish behavior to speak ill of the DPRK’s supreme headquarters this or that way because it convinces no one. Nah. Not me. We solemnly state that the DPRK’s supreme headquarters and the precious popular system enjoy the absolute trust of all the people and that any mud-slinging at them is what we guard against most strongly. If the shit hits the fan, it won’t be mud we’ll be slinging at you. The people and People’s Army of the DPRK regard it as the primary requirement of their life to devotedly defend the supreme headquarters representing their life and soul and do not hesitate to dedicate their lives to protecting it, a symbol of national dignity. Ah, yes. The "dignity". The U.S. is well advised to stop its rash acts, clearly mindful that with nothing can it break the single-hearted unity of the DPRK. If anybody ever gets up there, could they pick me up a "single-hearted unity" T-shirt? |
| Posted by:tu3031 |
| #7 They also apparently don't take Architectural Criticism well... |
| Posted by: mojo 2003-10-29 4:15:41 PM |
| #6 I think they've gone off the deep end. The post above this one indicates that they are starting to crack, and this one confirms it. his habitual rejection of the DPRK’s supreme headquarters and social system I think they might start to cry (I thought you loved me!) imposing harsh economic sanctions against the DPRK Why would sanctions matter to a country with Juche (self-reliance)? They should be impervious to sanctions. |
| Posted by: Spot 2003-10-29 1:54:58 PM |
| #5 Had poofy hair, Mojo. Remember, he solved the 'starvation' issue with his people. What do you think he gave them to eat? |
| Posted by: Charles 2003-10-29 12:48:51 PM |
| #4 Did we mention the poofy hair? No? Kimmie has poofy hair. |
| Posted by: mojo 2003-10-29 12:08:11 PM |
| #3 Hmm... no mention of Judice(sp?). But it does mention that Kimmie-boy solved the people's problems (starvation) in the 'workers paradise'. It also mention that all the people stand behind kimmie-boy and the headquarters (in spite of the thousands leaving for China...). Somehow I think that the Army is not entirely behind Kimmie-boy - much like Saddam you know.... But that is just a hunch. Hmmm... I give it a [also holds up card] 6.3 on the spittle meter. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2003-10-29 12:05:03 PM |
| #2 [holds up card] 7.8 Nice spittle, and putting 'starvation' in quotes walks that fine line between vituperative recklessness and indignant ... ... damn, now they've got me doing it! |
| Posted by: Steve White 2003-10-29 11:22:52 AM |
| #1 "But it is only leader Kim Jong Il who gives field guidance day and night to solve the problem of people’s living. " There's only one cure for living, and Kimmy's got enought to go around! |
| Posted by: BH 2003-10-29 11:17:53 AM |