You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Australia Agrees to Missile Defense Role
2003-12-04
Australia has agreed to participate in a U.S. program to build a defensive missile shield, the government announced Thursday. ``We believe that taking part in the U.S. program will serve our strategic interest, help us defend Australia and allow us to make an important contribution to global and regional security,’’ Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said in a statement.
"It'll also be real handy if North Korea decides to turn us into a sea of fire..."
Washington hopes to develop a shield against ballistic missiles, arguing that ``rogue states’’ like North Korea could soon have missiles to threaten the United States. It wants allies like Britain and Australia involved in the project, particularly for the use of satellite tracking stations in their countries.
Wouldn't hurt to have a few launch sites, either, I'd think...
Canada announced in May that it had entered formal talks with Washington about joining the program. It was not immediately clear what other countries - if any - have committed to playing a role.
'Bout damn time! I worry about Yellowknife. When's Jean departing, again?
Downer told Parliament that ``several lunatic countries in unstable regions’’ are developing ballistic missiles that in some cases would have the ability to carry weapons of mass destruction. Critics says the technology for such shields is complex, unreliable and expensive. Worse, they say, the plans could spark a new arms race.
Wow, Sean Penn is such a genius on so many things!
Australia has been one of Washington’s staunchest allies over the past hundred several years, pledging troops to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and stating clearly that its relationship with the United States is central to nation’s long-term interests.
New Zealand used to be that way, too. Maybe someday they'll be back in the fold...
Downer said the nature of Australia’s participation ``will depend on many factors including our own strategic defense needs, regional considerations, industry capabilities and financial considerations.’’ Defense Minister Robert Hill said Canberra will likely help in research for the multibillion dollar project and has no plans for a ground-based missile defense system on Australian soil.
Gonna put it on ships? Or are we working on satellite coverage?
``We have given that careful consideration and we think that we can play a part, obviously a small part in terms of the massive overall program,’’ Hill told reporters.
"Australia has a business community, too, and there's no reason some of the money shouldn't come our way..."
``We think that with the proliferation of long-range missiles and trends toward proliferation of mass destruction warheads, it is a sensible decision for Australia to take.’’
Aussies. We owe each of ’em a beer.

Shows good sense on their part. It's going to take years before the system's developed, debugged, and in place. While that's under way, the Bad Guys are going to be working hard to spread nukes to even more unstable states. Australia's within range of China, NKor, India, and Pakland, all of whom have nuclear weapons and two of which have a heavy concentration of lunatics close to the trigger. Ten years from now that list could be longer, and twenty years from now longer yet, until eventually you have to worry about whether there are fanatics about to come to power in the Comoros or Madagascar or Pitcairn Island. The longer it is before you start, the longer before you finish.
Posted by:Steve White

#10  Or are we working on satellite coverage?

I have no current knowledge of technology approaches being considered these days, but during the 1980's Strategic Defense Initiative, one of the advanced research areas was the Directed Energy Weapons program ... i.e. lasers which could, IIRC, be space-based. There has been a lot of progress on laser technology in general & it will be interesting to see if any of it emerges in a missile defense system.

The Kinetic Energy Weapons program, i.e. "smart rocks" was another of the bleeding edge SDI efforts. Haven't followed progress here.

Right now there is a lot of work happening on smart swarms of weapons. Imagine a group of smaller missiles that form a self-organizing communications network. One gets shot down & all the others confer, decide whether or not to retarget some of them in order to make sure the highest priority targets are hit.

Don't know if this has any defensive applications or if it is entirely for offensive use ....

One way or another, computing and communications will be central to ballistic missile defense.
Posted by: rkb   2003-12-4 8:38:01 PM  

#9  If not Foster's a VB. ;)
Posted by: eLarson   2003-12-4 6:08:15 PM  

#8  Phil, I think that daily is dreaming. The Norks shot missiles over Japan. The Australians got bombed in Bali. China seems to be helping with the Norks.
I beleive that the US is not pleased with the Taiwanese politician that is trying to antagonize the Chinese to help his reelection. There is two much going on already to start messing with the Chinese.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-12-4 5:44:39 PM  

#7  Having read the online editions of the Australian dayly newspaper. There is an interesting subtext here.

Its clear that there is a USA, Japan, Australia axis developing who's primary purpose is to face down China. The Norks just seem to be a convenient pretext. It probably explains why there has been an increase in Chinese sabre rattling recently. A son of star wars that works will make invading Taiwan a whole lot harder.
Posted by: Phil_B   2003-12-4 5:31:51 PM  

#6  Qazi or Fazl ranting and raving is a different matter from Qazi or Fazl actually warming the Seat of All Power...
Posted by: Fred   2003-12-4 2:40:46 PM  

#5  If the fundos ever take over there and in Pakland

Eh? When was Pakistan ("the land of the pure") ever free of the fundos? Its whole reason for existence is the establishment of an Islamic state.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2003-12-4 1:57:35 PM  

#4  I think some cold Fosters tonight. Several as a matter of fact.
Posted by: Lucky   2003-12-4 1:04:31 PM  

#3  If I was an Australian politician or in the Australian military I would be looking at Indonesia with a very jaundiced eye. If the fundos ever take over there and in Pakland things could start to get really dicy
Posted by: Cheddarhead   2003-12-4 10:54:32 AM  

#2  The idea is to make the weapons arsenals of rogue states obselete. They will then have to devote a greater portion of their wounded GNP's toward upgrading or adopt a differnt course.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-12-4 4:48:32 AM  

#1  Sh**, this will get the lefties (here in Australia) stirred up!

Howard is obviously drawing the issues for the next election. The good news is that the Australian labor party has elected someone as it leader who is on the record as saying 'Bush himself is the most incompetent and dangerous President in living memory.' and the media here is taking him to task for it.

I just love it when the left gets pushed into nasty corners because of their irrational prejudices. Reagan was stupid and brought down the Soviet Union. Bush is stupid and ??

I rate Howards chances in the next election as better than average. I think you can bet on elections in Australia. Mmmm!
Posted by: Phil_B   2003-12-4 3:26:01 AM  

00:00