You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Saudi scholars warn against products with religious names
2003-12-22
The Saudi Religious, Educational and Social Thinkers (SREST), an organisation of Saudi scholars, education specialists and researchers with almost ten thousand Saudi clerics as members, has warned Pakistanis not to use products with religious names and has demanded the Pakistani government ban all such products.
So snap it up, Pak government, for the good of your souls!
A SREST delegation, led by Pakistani-born Saudi scholar Dr Abdullah Ahmed, made the demand on Sunday during a news conference after expressing his astonishment at seeing so many products with religious names in Pakistan.
You can tell he's holier than everyone else. He sees sin where nobody noticed before...
Flanked by SREST colleagues Dr Abu Usama, Syed Abdulah Madni and Bint-e-Maryam, he said that they visited several universities, schools, collages, seminaries, religious and government institutions and met with clerics and social scholars. “The heartbreaking thing we learned in Pakistan was that Pakistani markets and shops are causing a major sin unknowingly by spreading products with religious names,” said Mr Ahmed.
"My heart is just broken! Sin! Ugly and foul! And nobody even noticed! Good thing I got here when I did!"
“Although some people tried to introduce similar products in Saudi Arabia, the media there has been campaigning against this emerging trend of using sacred names for commercial purposes,” Dr Ahmed informed. He said that the government in Saudi Arabia did not allow the production of some colas branded by sacred names such as those that have occupied a lot of shop space in Pakistan.
So much for Mecca Cola, and Prophet's Beard shampoo...
Asked why Saudi opinion leaders have opposed these products and brands, he said they believe manufacturers have been using these sacred names to gain financial benefits and market share by using Muslim sentiments in the global anti-terrorism environment. “It is really very regrettable...I have never seen even a single product named after any Christian holy city or Jesus in Europe and America,” the scholar added.
Come to think of it, neither have I. There's probably a reason for that. Somehow I can't see a real market for Our Lord and Savior TV dinners, not precisely because it would be sacriligeous, but maybe because it would be... ummm... silly.
“Just look at the names of some newly-launched colas. I think it’s very unfair to associate these beverages with religious names. If I take bottles of such colas home, use them and throw them away, how would you feel after seeing the bottle bearing a religious name in the trash? I think this is very unfair,” he said. “These actions will not serve any cause of Islam,” he added.
There goes my idea for marketing Holy Koran Kola...
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#19  Interesting, but terribly-written article in Tech Central Station about the relationship between government-enforced morality and tyranny that fits well with the comments in this article. Basically, the author says that there are two bases for law: "right" and "good". "Right" is the equal evaluation of expectations - I.E., basically "contracts", while "Good" is "moral" - 'this is what things SHOULD be'. GOOD can only be imposed, since each person's idea of what that means may differ. RIGHT is basically what the Founding Fathers considered the basis of government - and why they established that religion could never be either imposed, or expelled. Right requires a moral people to keep people willing to negotiate. GOOD imposes. ISLAM demands that people follow certain (7th century) ideas about morality, which is IMPOSED by the Clergy. Since the only way you can impose anything is by force, Islamic nations rapidly degenerate into tyrannies. Only secular governments can establish legal systems based on individual contractural behavior (Right).

The only problem is, there is no way to legislate morality without totally destroying individual rights. This leads to stagnation and collapse. This is why Islamic nations would be a total failure without the oil, and why the Middle East wasn't a player in world politics from about 1650 through 1945.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-12-22 11:50:10 PM  

#18  super hose
1. re SaudiArabia; the Saudis have managed to make the 12th month pilgramage (aka the Hadj)into a net zero or even loser financially for the national treasury by strictly controlling merchandizing, having to pay extra security expenses, having royal families get a cut of the motel bills, bribing the local Meccan imans to say nice things about the royal family, etc.
2. The Paleo Authority is trying to extort money from the networks for covering the xmas events in Bethlehem this year. see: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/374357.html
Posted by: mhw   2003-12-22 2:32:56 PM  

#17  Barry, if you look carefully at the Phd's that sculpted the final version of Koyoto, you will notice that few of them hold dotorates in anything remotely scientific.

If Saudi Arabia doesn't plan to capitalize economically on anything religious, I wonder how they plan to invigorate their tourism industry. Will all hotel accomodations in Mecca and Medina now be complementary?

Speaking of Bethlehem, saw something on the news last night about the slumping economy in David's town. Things are so bad that many young Christians from families that have lived in Bethlehem for hundereds of years are now leaving. Yasser Arafat has addressed a document to all travel agents not to sell plane tickets to young people unless they held an education visa for the country that they wanted tickets to. Sounds like his hostages are escaping.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-12-22 2:19:29 PM  

#16  mhw: Well, you were the one that asked the question, then you answered it, very well. I'll admit to not recognizing a lot of those names. David M. Rubenstein; I remember name from PBS funding blurbs back before I quit watching television completely. Rockefeller and Soros, and -- Zedillo? Oh, yeah, forgot you can't be selected King President of Mexico without office-perk coming away rich enough to get your name dropped in expensive places and do worldwide philanthropy. Nevertheless, the kind of output you've unearthed may explain something of the dismal performance of NGO's in WOTLand.
Posted by: Glenn (not Reynolds)   2003-12-22 1:25:28 PM  

#15  "You don't use Prophet Pomade? I insult your mustache!"
Posted by: Dar   2003-12-22 1:10:00 PM  

#14  Correct if i'm wrong but weren't there a lotta Ph.d's who supported the global warming scam at Kyoto?
Posted by: Barry   2003-12-22 11:24:42 AM  

#13  Glenn - not Reynolds

from the IIE website: The Institute’s annual budget is about $7 million. Support is provided by a wide range of charitable foundations, private corporations, and individuals...

the board of directors is:
Peter G. Peterson, Chairman
* Anthony M. Solomon, Chairman, Executive Committee

Leszek Balcerowicz
Conrad Black
Bill Bradley
Chen Yuan
George David
* Jessica Einhorn
Stanley Fischer
Jacob A. Frenkel
Maurice R. Greenberg
* Carla A. Hills
Nobuyuki Idei
Karen Katen
W. M. Keck II
Lee Kuan Yew
Donald F. McHenry
Minoru Murofushi
Paul O'Neill
Hutham Olayan
James W. Owens
Frank Pearl
Karl Otto Pöhl
* Joseph E. Robert, Jr.
David Rockefeller
David M. Rubenstein
Renato Ruggiero
Edward W. Scott, Jr.
George Soros
Lawrence H. Summers
Peter D. Sutherland
Jean Claude Trichet
Laura D’Andrea Tyson
Paul A. Volcker
* Dennis Weatherstone
Edward E. Whitacre, Jr.
Marina v.N. Whitman
Ernesto Zedillo


mostly left wing a few right wing; all free trade types; generally sane people, some a bit unhinged

just goes to show you that if you put some Phd's, captains of finance and other fine people together, you may still fund studies that are worthless
Posted by: mhw   2003-12-22 11:01:14 AM  

#12  mhw: I wonder who funds the Institute for International Economics?
Your mocking tone insinuates whomever is not getting much for their buck. Tsk.

BH: How would you plug that? I'm trying to visualize billboard art but keep coming up with schemes that would offend NAACP.
Posted by: Glenn (not Reynolds)   2003-12-22 10:43:36 AM  

#11  Well, there goes my idea for the "Osama's Mama" line of adult incontinence undergarments.
Posted by: BH   2003-12-22 10:28:59 AM  

#10  and Bethlehem Steel is now a subsidiary of the Intl Steel Group, which itself is, I think, in some form of receivership. Kind of like how the city of Bethlehem is part of the Paleo Auth which is in continuing subsidized bankrupcy.
Posted by: mhw   2003-12-22 10:09:16 AM  

#9  Bethlehem Steel was named for the home town of its original corporate headquarters, Bethlehem PA. That town was so named by Moravian settlers prior to the Revolutionary War.

FWIW. [smile]
Posted by: rkb   2003-12-22 9:27:08 AM  

#8  beat me to it Spot!!
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-12-22 9:26:28 AM  

#7  Does this mean I should sell my shares in Bethlehem Steel?;)
Posted by: Spot   2003-12-22 8:50:22 AM  

#6  an article in the Christian Science Monitor

http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1222/p17s01-wmgn.html

reports on a study by an academic that does not attribute slow economic growth on Islam. Reports like this show how idiotic said acedemic is:

here is part of the article
--------
Is Islam a drag on economic growth?.. A long line of scholars has blamed the relative poverty of Muslims today on their religious beliefs.
But economist Marcus Noland maintains that this long-standing view is wrong.

"There is nothing inherent about these [Islamic] societies that they have to perform poorly," says the economist with the Institute for International Economics in Washington. "If anything, Islam promotes growth.... There may be undue pessimism about the prospects of these countries."
---------------
I wonder who funds the Institute for International Economics?


Posted by: mhw   2003-12-22 8:29:37 AM  

#5  Non-Euro cultures have some ideas about brand names we would find odd. As y'all point out, religious brand names might not fly so well here.

Brand names translated from Japanese often come across to us as incredibly banal. Conversely, English-language brand names (and there's a lot) chosen for Japanese products for their market often come across to us as incredibly ludicrous. Culture. Obviously the Japs don't see it that way or they wouldn't use those names.

Shame the Saudis felt constrained not to give examples. Might have given insight why they are so offended. We're not the target audience.
Posted by: Glenn (not Reynolds)   2003-12-22 2:26:36 AM  

#4  Prophet's Beard shampoo LMAO!
Posted by: Rafael   2003-12-22 2:04:32 AM  

#3  Nix Koranflakes as well, I suppose...

-Vic
Posted by: Vic   2003-12-22 1:18:39 AM  

#2  So the 'Servant of Allah' adult diapers are done? Damn, I had some shares, hoping for a big payout.
Posted by: 4thInfVet   2003-12-22 1:17:33 AM  

#1  There goes my idea for marketing Holy Koran Kola...

Sorry, Fred. Looks as thought if you were to try it, you'd be... "under SREST."

*rimshot*

I'll be here all week, folks. Try the veal. Remember, tip your waitress. ^_^

Ed Becerra
Posted by: Ed Becerra   2003-12-22 12:24:18 AM  

00:00