| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front |
| Court Nixes Appeal Over 9-11 Detentions |
| 2004-01-12 |
| The Supreme Court refused Monday to consider whether the government properly withheld names and other details about hundreds of foreigners detained in the months after the Sept. 11 terror attacks. The high court turned down a request to review the secrecy surrounding detainees, nearly all Arabs or Muslims, who were picked up in the United States immediately following the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Outbreak of common sense at USSC! Details at 5. Many if not most of the more than 700 detainees at issue in the case have since been deported. Some picked up after Sept. 11 were charged with crimes, and others were held as material witnesses. A Washington study center critical of the Bush administration responses after Sept. 11 sued to learn names and other basic information about the detainees. The appeal Looks like it’s been decided. Twenty-three news organizations and media groups, including The Associated Press, joined in asking the high court to hear the case. "It is the responsibility of courts, and especially this court, to provide meaningful judicial review when the government invokes national security to justify unprecedented secrecy in exercising its awesome power to arrest and detain hundreds of people," lawyers for the Center for National Security Studies argued in a court filing. "History shows that, in times of crisis and fear, executive officials are prone to overreact, especially in their treatment of minorities in their midst," the appeal said. "Then again, we’re not the ones likely to be splatter if our position turns out to be wrong." The government grabbed people on thin suspicion, then moved to deport detainees who had no demonstrated link to terrorism but who had violated civil immigration laws, lawyers for the Center for National Security Studies We didn’t know that until we had a chance to review them, now did we? The government sealed immigration records and omitted detainees’ names from jail rosters, among other tactics, to make sure that details of hundreds of arrests remained secret, the lawyers said. The high court’s decision not to review the case represents a victory for the Bush administration. The detainee names case is Center for National Security Studies v. Justice Department, 03-472. Good victory for the WoT. |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #5 Sandy must've called in sick today. It is the cold and flu season. |
| Posted by: tu3031 2004-1-12 9:25:37 PM |
| #4 "The high court’s decision not to review the case represents a victory for the Bush administration." No it's a victory for AMERICA and those trying to protect it! |
| Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter) 2004-1-12 7:10:44 PM |
| #3 If they want names, ok: Mohammed, Mahmoud, Ahmed, Abu, Abdul, Ali... that should already cover 50% One out of two ain't bad, right? Add a "bin" and you get 75% |
| Posted by: True German Ally 2004-1-12 2:13:33 PM |
| #2 What's the difference between "civil immigration laws" and "criminal immigration laws"? Is there one? If so, why? |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2004-1-12 12:35:10 PM |
#1 then moved to deport detainees who had no demonstrated link to terrorism but who had violated civil immigration laws, lawyers for the Center for National Security Studies wildly claimed told the court. Are we only supposed to deport terrorists? Sounds to me like the government acted in accordance with US law. |
| Posted by: Scott 2004-1-12 12:19:28 PM |