You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Army to keep troops in one place longer
2004-02-10
Army officials unveiled plans Monday to keep first-term soldiers in their units for more than twice as long as they do now, a move they say will hone units better for combat while providing more stability for soldiers’ families. Under the plan, called "home-basing," soldiers will remain in their first assignments as long as seven years, if they re-enlist, instead of the current three-year average. That means new privates could expect to stay at the same post until they reach the rank of staff sergeant and serve as squad leaders. Freshly commissioned lieutenants would remain until they make captain and serve as company commanders or equivalents. It also means soldiers would be in their assignments long enough to purchase homes; they would be able to keep their children in the same schools longer and could establish other roots in the community.
Assuming you get a decent assignment, that's great. One of the reasons I retired as soon as I had my 20 in was that I'd never been one place long enough to own a house.
"The focus of this program," said Brig. Gen. Sean J. Byrne, the Army’s director of personnel policy, "is to increase readiness and stability for the fighting force and predictability for family members." Byrne said more young soldiers were married and had families than ever before. The measure comes as the Army is reorganizing its 10 divisions to boost the number of combat brigades from 33 to 48 over the next few years. Byrne said the Army intended to use the home-basing measure as part of a broader effort beginning next September to staff the new brigades and to even out troop rotations in existing ones. Under that plan, called "unit-focused stability," new soldiers would arrive in a brigade at the same time and remain there three years, an average first enlistment. They would remain in that brigade if they re-enlist.
I'd guess there's a provision to re-enlist for someplace else, if the Army's okay but the post isn't someplace the troops wants to be...
In units returning from Iraq, soldiers set to leave the service would be discharged 90 to 120 days after they get home. The newly returned brigade then would undergo intensive training for five to six months, until its soldiers are ready for deployment. It would be considered in a "high state of readiness" for about the next 30 months, with the goal of keeping the entire unit together for about three years, Byrne said. Soldiers could expect to deploy once for six to 12 months during the three-year period, or the unit’s "operational cycle." At the end of three years, a batch of fresh soldiers would replace those whose enlistments were coming to an end. A certain percentage of soldiers could be expected to re-enlist and remain in the unit, Byrne said.
I think that's how they did it in the 1930s...
Most Army units now are manned through the use of an individual replacement system, which means that about 13 percent of the Army’s 480,000 active-duty soldiers are in transition from one place to another at any given time. Byrne said Army officials thought the new measure would help build "stability and cohesion" throughout a given unit, from the lowest to the highest levels. "If you go down to a rifle battalion, and if you can keep that squad or that platoon together, so that you know what the guy’s going to do on your right or your left, that makes you a better soldier," Byrne said. "You have more confidence in your unit and you have more confidence in your leaders. You basically know who they are, so that when they tell you their intent, you know how to operate."
Interesting. Comments?
Posted by:Steve White

#5  OP,

Make no mistake, this is being done for the Army, not its people. It's woprkable, because it was how the Army worked before WWII as some member of the Army of Steve pointed out.
Posted by: Mr. Davis   2004-2-11 12:02:56 AM  

#4  I served for roughly 26 years, combined active, reserve, and "other". During that time, I made 16 major moves and pulled about a half-dozen temporary duty assignments. The longest I ever stayed anywhere was 4 1/2 years. And I was Air Force!

This is a nice concept, but I'm not sure it's workable as it's designed. We have too many major commitments worldwide, each with its own requirements and needs. I'd much rather see the Army designate four or five stateside bases and an equal number of National Guard and Reserve units to be a "block", and move the regiments and brigades of that block where they're needed, as a unit. It would take some strong logistic planning, but we could swap out the 37,000 soldiers in Korea in three 12,000+ unit segments, leaving two units with experience while the third gets up to snuff. I could also see remaining with a given division or corps for an entire career, but not a single unit. There would be a need for some minor adjustments of personnel, based on mission and manpower needs.

I think the Army's trying to do what it can to make life in today's military easier - I'm just not sure the current plan will work that well to meet the needs of both the Army and its people.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2004-2-10 2:22:47 PM  

#3  Everything old is new again. This is the way things used to be, people stayed in one unit for a long time and built up unit cohesion. Then the pencil pushers decided that moving people around would give them a wider breath of experience and put limits on how long you could remain in one place. It was very disruptive, especially to families. This move back to homebasing is a good thing.
Posted by: Steve   2004-2-10 8:35:44 AM  

#2  Good to see that the Ary is finnaly catching up with the Air Force! The Air Force program is called "Homesteading" and works very well.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2004-2-10 8:22:46 AM  

#1  Being able tkeep your family in one place instead of moving every couple of years will go along way toward reducing family friction and help with retention,too.
Posted by: Raptor   2004-2-10 7:35:58 AM  

00:00