You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
’All-commando’ army planned
2004-02-10
REGULAR infantry in the Australian army of the future will need to have skills required in the past only by commandos. The skills and independent ethos of the special forces needed to be spread more widely across the army so other units could be sent to fight the war on terror, Chief of Army Peter Leahy said. Regular and Reserve troops needed not only increased combat and field communication skills, but the training in languages and different cultures that helped special forces blend into hostile territory. Lieutenant-General Leahy told the National Press Club yesterday that Australian soldiers were as likely in the next decade to fight terrorist insurgencies, prop up failing nation states and provide disaster relief as they were to fight a conventional war. "Not only is warfare changing but the range of tasks that the army may be required to perform is also expanding rapidly," Gen Leahy said. "Putting it bluntly, the nation state has lost its near monopoly on the ability to wage war. Now a wide range of actors, from criminal gangs through issue-motivated groups to terrorists with global reach, means violence has proliferated, dispersed and become more deadly."

The army is understood to be examining establishing a second mechanised brigade, which would greatly increase Australia’s ability to send troops overseas. The Army Reserve’s role is likely to be expanded to take on a new role: providing security for the headquarters of deployed forces. Also under consideration is establishing a specialist Reserve unit of "nation builders" involving engineers, architects and aid workers to help rehabilitate communities affected by fighting or regional conflict. The moves already build on the Government’s broader effort to expand the number of special forces by 300 and develop a Reserve Ready Response Force to respond to terrorist attacks and protect infrastructure vulnerable to attack. General Leahy said that too much of the burden of recent deployments, such as in Afghanistan and Iraq, had fallen on a small portion of the land force -- namely the special forces and support combat units. "Our units will need to rapidly transition between civic aid and humanitarian tasks and war fighting," General Leahy said. "This is going to require cultural change of an unprecedented order. The sorts of (skills) that spring to mind are more diverse language and cultural skills, detailed knowledge of the rules of armed conflict and discretion in the use of force. We have already seen the development of the Ready Response Force for domestic security in the war on terror ... in the future I hope to introduce proposals for other units to assist in the reinforcement and rotation of regular units (on deployment)."
Posted by:tipper

#5  Australia wouldn't be a terrible place to move our heavy forces out of Korea. Let those ingrates stew in their own puddle of sh*t.

Something to think about.
Posted by: 4thInfVet   2004-2-10 10:11:33 PM  

#4  What is it about liberal Western democracies that create such outstanding soldiers?

Enlightened self-interest. We're all part of the solution - and you can be a brainiac, or just a strong arm; still you're key to the whole equation. Everyone stands to benefit, and everyone has a part to play.

-Vic
Posted by: Vic   2004-2-10 9:46:48 PM  

#3  Well, the actual, deployable Australian armed forces are tiny. Besides the special forces I believe there are no more than 6 battalion-size units that can be sent abroad, and their equipment is quite obsolete.
Posted by: Anonymous   2004-2-10 9:43:13 PM  

#2  The more I read about the Aussies, the more heartened I am that they are our steadfast allies in this global war. Even before Bali, they, almost more than the UK, were in for a pound with us. I am grateful for John Howard's leadership and the service and sacrifice of our Anglospheric partners (even though we were not able to count on Canada in Iraq, they have helped us out in Afghanistan). I think Pres. Bush would be wise to expand our training, coordination and cooperation with the Aussies. From everything I have read, their SAS and SBS-types are outstanding soldiers and tough SOBs. What is it about liberal Western democracies that create such outstanding soldiers?
Posted by: Tibor   2004-2-10 9:23:05 PM  

#1  That's smart by the aussies. It costs shitloads less to overtrain light infantry than it does even OWNING a few armored divisions.
Posted by: 4thInfVet   2004-2-10 9:10:26 PM  

00:00