| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Grand old policy |
| 2004-02-12 |
| A scholar argues that Bush’s doctrine of preemption has deep roots in American history EVERY PRESIDENT makes foreign policy. Only a select few, over the sweep of history, design what scholars term grand strategy. Grand strategy is the blueprint from which policy follows. It envisions a country’s mission, defines its interests, and sets its priorities. Part of grand strategy’s grandeur lies in its durability: A single grand strategy can shape decades, even centuries, of policy. Who, then, have been the great grand strategists among American statesmen? According to a slim forthcoming volume by John Lewis Gaddis, the Yale historian whom many describe as the dean of Cold War studies and one of the nation’s most eminent diplomatic historians, they are John Quincy Adams, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and George W. Bush. Gaddis knows the latter name may bring a number of his colleagues up short. Critics charge that President Bush is a lightweight, Gaddis laments, and they do so because the president is a generalist who prefers the big picture to its details. Over lunch at Mory’s, Yale’s tweedy private dining club, Gaddis suggests that academics underrate Bush because they overvalue specialized knowledge. In reality, as his new book asserts, after Sept. 11, 2001, Bush underwent "one of the most surprising transformations of an underrated national leader since Prince Hal became Henry V." The Bush doctrine is more serious and sophisticated than its critics acknowledge -- but it is also less novel, Gaddis maintains. Three of its core principles -- preemptive war, unilateralism, and American hegemony -- actually hark back to the early 19th century, to the time of John Quincy Adams. . . Click on the link to read the rest |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #3 The biggest problem with academics is that most of them are leftists, whose main belief is that they are superior to everyone else. Thus, since George Bush isn't a leftist, he's not one of them, therefore he's stupid. It's the pinnacle of hypocracy and stupidity for the leftist academics to believe this, but that's their philosophy regarding George Bush in a nutshell. |
| Posted by: Old Patriot 2004-2-12 12:31:49 PM |
| #2 That's because Professors - the self-designated priests of our generation - don't have any leadership skills, nor do they need them. Thus they have no clue what makes a good leader. |
| Posted by: B 2004-2-12 7:58:28 AM |
| #1 I agree that academic specialists despise generalists. I think that the Internet is bringing back an age of the generalist. Steven Den Beste is good example. |
| Posted by: phil_b 2004-2-12 5:24:35 AM |