You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Report: Bush not killed in ’Nam
2004-02-12
iowahawk. EFL; there’s more laughs in the article. [Satire, from 1999 -Fred]
Austin, TX - In a shocking report that threatens to shake up the nascent 2000 presidential campaign, the Los Angeles Times reported Friday that Texas Governor George W. Bush "failed to die, or even sustain critical combat injuries" while a pilot for the Texas National Guard during the Vietnam War.

The blockbuster disclosure was only one of a number of embarrassing revelations uncovered in the Times report, the news of which continues to reverberate through Washington. "If true, these charges immediately call into question Mr. Bush’s fitness for office," said Democratic National Committee Chairman Roy Romer. "I can only hope that the American people will see the hypocrisy of a non-casualty running for our country’s highest elective office."

The front-page expose was the result of a six-month, $82 million investigation by the Times, which uncovered a raft of unseemly details about the GOP frontrunner’s mysterious past. "We were tipped off that Bush had a lot of skeletons in his closet, but nothing of this magnitude," said staff writer Richard Serrano, who compiled the 85,000-word story.

According to Serrano, the investigative staff at the Times became interested in the story late last year, when the Texas governor’s name was first floated as a possible candidate for the 2000 GOP presidential nomination. "It was somewhat odd - he was extremely evasive about answering questions about his past or his personal life," noted Serrano. "Even innocuous questions about his personal hygiene and teenage masturbation habits seemed to make him squirm."

The Times staff became more inquisitive after Bush formally declared his candidacy, when they received a series of anonymous tips from their Washington Bureau. "Our DC team uncovered some very juicy Bush tidbits while giving Sidney Blumenthal his complementary weekly pedicure," explained Serrano. "We knew then the story was just too big to keep the lid on."

What they found, according to Serrano, was "explosive."

"After hundreds of interviews, we were unable to identify a single instance of then-airman Bush being shot down by the Viet Cong, or even fragged by his own men," said Serrano. "What’s more, after returning to civilian life, Bush failed to go on a psychotic killing rampage, become a homeless drifter or even poignantly kill himself by swimming out to sea. This stands in stark contrast to the typical experience of most Vietnam veterans. At least in the movies I’ve seen."

While the Times was unable to identify any illegalities, Serrano said that the facts "are suggestive of favoritism and special treatment" for Bush.

"Oddly, this son of a Texas congressman was able to luxuriate in the decadent opulence of a Houston Air National Guard base, while poor boys were forced to do the dangerous work - wading through the rice paddies of southeast Asia, or leading exhausting protest marches at Oxford," added Serrano.
Posted by:Korora

#9  I think Jarhead is onto seomthing here. I DEMAND that John Friggin Kerry produce documentation that he DID NOT commit war crimes during Vietnam. Come on prove a negative, if you can!
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2004-2-12 9:05:06 PM  

#8  RC, right on. I'm w/you.

Though, if I had been sitting on a congressional inquiry board I would've asked "well, Mr. Kerry what did you do to prevent or report these crimes.........." Put his lying-ass on the hot seat.
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-2-12 9:00:54 PM  

#7  Jarhead, my comment was tongue-in-cheek. I don't think Kerry is covering up any war crimes because I think he lied out his ass while testifying to Congress.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-2-12 8:46:04 PM  

#6  RC, Kerry was an officer on a p.t. boat (brown water Navy anyways) and bound to prevent or report any war crimes he had direct knowledge of. If he failed to do so, he should of been court martialed. Otoh, being on a boat, other then his own crew's actions, who did he have a chance to see commit crimes up close and personal?
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-2-12 8:30:16 PM  

#5  AFAIK alcohol has been banned from inside the city limits since always. Lubbock county is not dry. Atomic Conspiracy can tell us. At any rate the professor was no more serious about the disco than about the not killing babys.
Posted by: GK   2004-2-12 5:56:33 PM  

#4  were there any booze halls of any kind in the city of Lubbock then? Now?

I will assume that's an ironical question.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-2-12 5:37:07 PM  

#3   I heard he did not kill any baby civilians while not in Nam either!

That's more than Kerry can say. Remember, in his testimony before Congress, Kerry said that war crimes were "daily occurences" that happened "with the full knowledge of the chain of command". He was part of that chain of command; what war crimes has he been covering up?

(Yes, that's tongue-in-cheek.)
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-2-12 5:27:31 PM  

#2  Unedited version has Bush in a Lubbock disco in 1978. More satire I take about being where there ain't. AC, were there any booze halls of any kind in the city of Lubbock then? Now?
Posted by: GK   2004-2-12 4:44:23 PM  

#1  I heard he did not kill any baby civilians while not in Nam either!
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-2-12 3:49:40 PM  

00:00