You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Ya know that train blast in Iran? May not have been fertilizer.
2004-02-19
From DEBKA:
Little credence is given in Tehran to the official claim that the colossal train explosion which killed at least 300 people and razed five villages in the northeastern Khorassan province Wednesday was caused by colliding wagons carrying industrial chemicals and fertilizers, as well as diesel fuel and cotton. Such flammable freights are usually shipped separately in Iran. DEBKAfile’s sources note that Iranian officials, two days before a highly controversial parliamentary election, are doing their best to play down the disaster outside Neyshabur which rocked houses 50 miles away in Mashad. The Islamic Republican News Agency tried to blame an earth tremor of 3.6 magnitude, but the US Geological Institute in Colorado said no seismic activity was recorded in the area. Most of the dead were fire and rescue workers, but also the city’s governor Mojtaba Farahmand-Nekou, its mayor and fire chief.

DEBKA’s sources in Tehran have heard unconfirmed reports that the disaster was no accident, but possibly sabotage carried out by anti-government forces in Khorassan province, which borders on Afghanistan. This report ties in with another that claims the train was not carrying innocent industrial cargoes but hundreds of tons of explosive materials Iran was smuggling into Afghanistan via the Shiite city of Herat to be used by Iranian saboteurs and agents for guerrilla attacks on US troops and the forces of President Hamid Karzai, as well for supplying the Taleban in their Kandahar stronghold. DEBKAfile’s sources report that there were a series of blasts; the first inside the Neyshabur train station was powerful enough to trigger a second explosion in the remote station of Khayyam. There, it set ablaze another train carrying fuel and other flammable material.

Iran has long used Khorassan province as a conduit for smuggling thousands of its agents into Afghanistan. But the province is also home to nearly two million Afghan refugees, some of whom hire out as agents to the Kabul government or the US military. The suggestion is that a group of these agents were ordered to blow up the train when it pulled into Neyshabur. Their mission: to deter the Iranians from further meddling in Afghanistan. It would not have been hard to persuade Afghan refugees to undertake the mission. As Sunni Muslims, they harbor strong feelings of resentment against their discrimination at the hands of Iran’s Shiite majority. Three years ago, Afghans were responsible for a large explosion in Mashad, an attack launched after Iran ordered the destruction of a makeshift mosque the refugees had built. Several weeks later, a similar blast occurred in Zahedan, capital of Iran’s Baluchestan province, where Iranian authorities had pulled down another mosque constructed by the refugees.
Will Iran be dissuaded? Will the Iranian reformers get pissed off enough at their theocratic leaders to stage a coup? Will Afghanistan’s relationship with Iran grow icy? Will the USA intervene, covertly or overtly? Will more innocent Iranians become cannon fodder for the ROP? Will the French appease/surrender/blame the Jews? Again. Stay tuned for another episode of All My Jihadis.
Posted by:PlanetDan

#12  
Will the French appease/surrender/blame the Jews? Again.
Of course.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-2-19 9:55:08 PM  

#11  Debka's scroll last night read that there were 182,000 causalities from the explosion. I hope it was a "fat finger" error rather than reporting. I check them regularly but sometimes the articles have to be parsed.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2004-2-19 6:26:35 PM  

#10  Someone:
Don't discount DEBKa just because they're biased. After all, if you do that you have to discount.... well, every news source. Sift and compare, sift and compare. That is presumably why you are joining us here at Rantburg today.
Posted by: Secret Master   2004-2-19 1:37:58 PM  

#9  Too bad it wasn't a trainload of mullahs!
Posted by: Craig   2004-2-19 1:27:52 PM  

#8  Popcorn...check.
Diet soda pop...check.
Tin foil hat...check.
Posted by: Dragon Fly   2004-2-19 11:53:45 AM  

#7  It's DEBKA, so probably 50% is flat wrong and the rest just garbled.
Posted by: someone   2004-2-19 11:10:34 AM  

#6  Steve, you are probably right. That explosion was awesome.
Posted by: dataman1   2004-2-19 10:05:15 AM  

#5  "Hundreds of tons" of explosives seems to me to be less than useful for terrorists and guerillas.

Hundreds of tons of explosives can also mean rockets, mortar rounds, mines, etc. The description of the blast sounds to me like a classic ammonium nitrate fertilizer explosion, like the Texas City explosion in 1947. That one killed 600 people and was heard 150 miles away.
Posted by: Steve   2004-2-19 9:57:06 AM  

#4  Special Ops? mmmmmmm
Posted by: dataman1   2004-2-19 9:54:32 AM  

#3  I dunno. "Hundreds of tons" of explosives seems to me to be less than useful for terrorists and guerillas. Hard to move, hard to hide, hard to deal with.

I could be wrong, and wouldn't at all be surprised if it were sabotage, but I doubt that aspect of the story.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-2-19 9:29:22 AM  

#2  ....rocked houses 50 miles away....
Holey moley, speak of MOABs.

Better one big blast in Iran than hundreds of smaller ones in Afghanistan. Someone is to be congratulated. It's gonna be awhile before that conduit is flowing again.

Posted by: GK   2004-2-19 9:21:02 AM  

#1  This story makes me feel warm and fuzzy. I like to think 90% of the real action is under the radar, like mysterious train blasts.
Posted by: Anonymous   2004-2-19 8:54:31 AM  

00:00