You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
’Bankrupt’ Canadian Forces may shut 5 bases
2004-02-25
Canada’s army, navy and air force are facing a funding shortfall of up to half a billion dollars, defence sources told the National Post, and the military is recommending drastic measures to make up the difference, including closing some of the largest bases in the country.
Then again, Canadians might not notice.
The federal government is stalling the release of internal documents that outline the looming financial crisis, but military sources said the reports indicate that in the fiscal year beginning on April 1, the air force expects to be $150-million short of funds needed to fulfill its commitments, the navy will be $150-million shy of its needs and the army will be as much as $200-million short. The military sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the reports foresee a situation so dire that they recommend curtailing operations, dry-docking ships and mothballing vehicles or aircraft and closing at least four Canadian Forces bases. Further, the air force report says that unless its fleet of ageing CC-130 Hercules transport planes is replaced or modernized, the main transport base at Trenton should be closed within 10 years. "There won’t be enough Hercs flying by then to justify keeping that base open," one air force source said.
I’m sure we have some in a boneyard in Arizona we could give them.
The navy predicts it will not be able to live up to treaty obligations to NATO and other alliances and cannot carry out enough patrols of Canadian waters to comply with agreements with other government departments such as Immigration Canada or Fisheries and Oceans. "We will not be able to meet our domestic defence obligations," one naval officer said.
Open season for poaching salmon.
The army is said to be in the worst financial state of all three branches of the Canadian Forces. "Everyone knows that the army’s broke and has been for a couple of years," said one military source familiar with the reports. Colonel Howard Marsh, a former senior army staff officer now working as an analyst for the Conference of Defence Associations, said he was not surprised by the size of the shortfall. "This is a look forward ... at what they need in order to keep the army going," he said. "Nobody has ever seen a bankrupt military in a developed country.... This year I predict we will see that in Canada."
I remember a day when Canada punched above its weight.
Col. Marsh said the military is saddled with ageing bases and increasingly dilapidated buildings that are fast reaching the point of collapse. "What they’ve been doing, year in and year out ... is not replace or repair those buildings, or buy new equipment," he said. "The average age of the equipment in the Canadian Forces is over 20 years and it hasn’t been well-maintained." The Liberal government reduced defence spending by 23% and cut the number of regular military personnel to approximately 60,000 from 80,000 between 1993 and 2000. There were 120,000 people in the Canadian military in 1958. In 2003, the defence budget was increased $800-million to $12.7-billion, the single largest increase since the Liberals came to power. But that still left the total below that of 1991, when the Mulroney Conservatives committed troops to the Gulf War and the defence budget stood at $12.8-billion. Major-General Terry Hearn, the chief of finance for the Canadian Forces, acknowledged the military has had "issues" with funding over the past four years. But he said the department is implementing a long-term plan to stabilize its finances. "We’ll become sustainable over the next couple of years," he said.
"As long as we’re not invaded this year."
Posted by:Steve White

#14  I have an idea for Canada....East Alaska
Posted by: Yosemite Sam   2004-2-25 6:00:49 PM  

#13  Alaska?
Posted by: Napoleon VII   2004-2-25 5:16:14 PM  

#12  Gee...if China wanted a nice, big, defenseless, resource-rich foothold in N. America, I bet I can think of one for them.
Posted by: mjh   2004-2-25 4:35:28 PM  

#11   Not trying to fuel any fires,but the Canadian Government is in process of trying a national gun registry that's going to cost between 1-2 BILLION dollars(was originally estimated to cost@3 MILLION).Think that money could have been used elsewhere?
Posted by: Stephen   2004-2-25 2:49:01 PM  

#10  30 years of psycho-liberal government takes a toll. Thanks, Quebec. We knew you could screw up a wet dream, but nobody expected results this soon!
Posted by: mojo   2004-2-25 11:00:40 AM  

#9  Watch Canada closely, this is France's future if they can't get their GNP to grow and support their own nanny state programs. With a rising islamic radical population in their own boarders, France will become the europian afganistan in ten years if they can't pull their collective heads out of their collective asses.
Posted by: mmurray821   2004-2-25 9:43:17 AM  

#8  So when does the US take over the parts that want to join us? I have often read that the Western regions feel and think more like the US than the East.
Posted by: Jim K   2004-2-25 9:25:42 AM  

#7  Here's an idea - why don't they stop admitting all of those immigrants and asylum seekers who promptly go on their public dole and use the resulting taxpayers money for the taxpayers??

This worries me - Canada's decline is a far greater threat to us than France's. They better take a good look in the mirror and see if they want to be the host for a staging ground of Jihad against the US.
Posted by: B   2004-2-25 9:15:26 AM  

#6  God, this is pathetic! Oh well. Uncle Sugar's still around to cover their asses if something really bad happens. Think they're aware of that?
Posted by: tu3031   2004-2-25 8:42:57 AM  

#5  I remember getting in a discussion with a Canadian journalist in a bar in Washington a couple of years ago and asked him whether Canada was too undercapitalized to be a country anymore; he didn't disagree with me
Posted by: Hiryu   2004-2-25 8:03:12 AM  

#4  I remember a day when Canada punched above its weight.
They kept a mechanized brigade/mini division in Germany for years... now they have 9(?) battalions of infantry, much of it deployed.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-2-25 7:50:39 AM  

#3  We might want to keep an even closer eye northward--our borders. Don't want to give the jihadis easy access.

A perfect example of what happens when liberals have their way--destroy their country from within and without.
Posted by: joe   2004-2-25 6:44:13 AM  

#2  Canada has a military?

Why? Seems like a white elephant for a country like Canada. After all, they have alliances with foreign countries that will defend them in the unlikely event that they're ever invaded.
Posted by: gromky   2004-2-25 5:43:12 AM  

#1  This is what would have happened if Kerry had gotten his way all those years in the Senate. And he didn't always lose. This is what WILL happen if Kerry is elected.

He is a liberal. Given a choice, liberals will always cut the military to fund their nanny state programs. That's exactly what happened in Canada and what will happen to us...if Kerry and the Dems take power again.
Posted by: RMcLeod   2004-2-25 4:30:08 AM  

00:00