You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
U.S. Criticized Over Arab Women's Rights
2004-03-05
NEW YORK (AP) - The U.S. government hasn't done enough to promote women's rights in Iraq and Afghanistan, three women's organizations said Thursday.
Other than liberate them from Saddam and Mullah Omar, you mean.
The criticism came as the Feminist Majority, the Women's Environment and Development Organization, and the Center for Health and Gender Equality released their Global Women's Issues Scorecard.
Wonder if these old biddies have an agenda?
U.S. officials have been strong in their verbal support for including women's rights in the Afghan constitution, Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority, said in a telephone conference. "But strong statements have not been met with actual action."
We could force them at the point of a rifle, but that wouldn't work long-term. Not that Eleanor would know anything about that either.
She argued that women's rights are threatened by Afghan efforts to make family law subject to Islamic codes, by insecurity and the rise of militias, and by the U.S. failure to give Eleanor everything she wants now, including a pony spend on reconstruction.
Anytime the fierce old bats at NOW want to take on the Taliban, fine with me.
The U.S. State Department had no immediate comment.
"Marvin! What's our response to these saintly ladies?"
"Ignore them, Mr. Secretary?"
"That never works with Eleanor. C'mon, I need something here."
"You could laugh in her face."
"Much as I'd like to, that's no good either."
"I'm fresh out, sir."
June Zeitlin, head of the New York-based Women's Environment and Development Organization, said that in Iraq, women's participation in the transitional leadership has been very limited, despite pledges by the U.S.-led coalition to promote it. "I think the administration just doesn't get it," she said. "They are speaking about women's rights and participation. I think they have underestimated the extremism (opposing women's rights) ... in both societies."
We didn't under-estimate it, we knew going in what it would be. But go ahead June, you persaude Sistani to include more women in the Shi'a leadership.
Iraqi women have achieved some victories - for example, a clause in the interim constitution that sets a goal of 25 percent women's representation under the future elected government. But they have done so largely by demanding it themselves in street demonstrations, Zeitlin said, adding that U.S. officials didn't favor a quota system.
Eeeek! They did it themselves? They didn't have Eleanor there to demand it for them? I'm having the vapors, I'd best go lie down!
"Experience around the world shows that without quotas, women have not achieved critical mass" in politics, she said.
Just like here in the U.S. ... er, no, that's not right, I mean, just like in the U.K., ... um, no, I mean France, oh wait ...
Posted by:Steve White

#17  Something else that's America's fault? Oh, well. Add it to the list...
Posted by: tu3031   2004-3-5 10:29:09 PM  

#16  These aren't feminists, IMHO, they're LLL morons who're hiding behind their gender in hopes of making any dissent to their idiocy seem un-PC.

Melike wymyns. Merespect wymyns. The best programmer I've ever known was a wymyns. I wanted to jump her brain - and her bones were pretty great, too - but that brain... yummynumms! In all aspects of law, wymyns should be treated absolutely equally. Period.
Posted by: .com   2004-3-5 9:51:38 PM  

#15  its is not up to the US to dictate internal issues for these people. we need to maintain the communication and support for these issues and ensure raghead terrorists do not gain controll. outside of this it is up to the locals. we can do only so much.
if we keep the ragheads at bay then moderate forces in these countries and take the forefront.
Posted by: Dan   2004-3-5 3:11:54 PM  

#14  I see the script for a new movie....Godzilla vs the Taliban....

wait, that was so last year.
Posted by: john   2004-3-5 12:14:34 PM  

#13  I see the script for a new movie....Godzilla vs the Taliban....

wait, that was so last year.
Posted by: john   2004-3-5 12:14:31 PM  

#12  Relax... they just want someone to look pained and talk a bunch of sh*t about policies he never intends to pursue. Clinton set the bar pretty high in this respect.
Posted by: BH   2004-3-5 10:52:13 AM  

#11  I'll wager that the three named organizations put together don't have the number of members as Concerned Women for America.
Posted by: eLarson   2004-3-5 10:31:41 AM  

#10  Radical feminists - why do they hate us?
Posted by: Sparks   2004-3-5 9:13:34 AM  

#9  Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority, said in a telephone conference. "But strong statements have not been met with actual action."

Lord, have mercy. It's back. Just when you think the women's rights movement is over and women's rights won, here comes Eleanor bitching some more.

I think the administration just doesn't get it," she said. "They are speaking about women's rights and participation. I think they have underestimated the extremism (opposing women's rights...

June, just a hint: I wouldn't talk about extremeism while leading a pack of carpet munchers. Cute trick though, complaining about Bush inasmuch as he was the one who knocked out two anti-western values governments and restored some sanity in government there. Not even your fave cabana boy Clinton had the cajones to do that.

Oopsie. Did I say cajones?
Posted by: badanov   2004-3-5 8:59:14 AM  

#8  I believe that there are several worthwhile feminist groups in the US that make a diference - the League of Women Voters comes to mind. These three groups do not fall into that catagory.
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-3-5 7:44:45 AM  

#7  While our feminists are arguing for, (well.. what are they arguing for these days?) those gals over there in Afghanistan and Iraq are fighting real problems, the chattle attitude, the Shaira laws that say that female adulterers get stoned while men go free, manditory burka wearing, no education because you got an innie instead of an outie. Why western feminists don't do more to help them is beyond me. Makes ours look like hypocrits.
Posted by: Ben   2004-3-5 4:59:42 AM  

#6  Excellent Comments All.
Posted by: B   2004-3-5 2:27:59 AM  

#5  Let me guess. These three women organizations called to demonstrate against the war for oil and called to ask about "why they hate us" instead of Afgahnistan.
Posted by: JFM   2004-3-5 2:04:30 AM  

#4  They can't do that, TT, they might muss up their hair. Ya can't make a statement with bad hair.

Whereas I think the women of Rantburg could go over there and kick Sadr's ass.
Posted by: Steve White   2004-3-5 12:58:33 AM  

#3  Why don't they go over to Iraq and make their case to Mullah Sadr?

Go up to Khandahar and deliver their report to the locals? Huh?

Think globally, act locally. Go develop some community ties, human networks, spread freedom and opportunity? Go preach women's rights to the village Imam in the tribal lands on Pakistan's border.
Posted by: Tokyo Taro   2004-3-5 12:51:07 AM  

#2  If these "feminists" are so concerned with the plight and future of 3rd world women, I'd suggest they get off their Western asses and to over there and do something constructive to help the women.

But they'll never give up their comfy Western lives. They're whiners, not doers.

And I resent them for the bad name they give real women.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-3-5 12:43:58 AM  

#1  What are we going to do with a third world full of women who think the U.S.A. owes them a living? That's where these "Women's Idiots", (insert the name of your choice), organizations are out there doing. They're teaching these women how to DEMAND "entitlements" from the U.S. treasury.
Posted by: Danny   2004-3-5 12:35:32 AM  

00:00