You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
"The 9/11 Families" Don’t Represent Me
2004-03-08
Posting it all since WSJ Online requires reg for this one
The attacks happened to us all.
BY DEBRA BURLINGAME
In the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on our country, the families of those who perished on that day became forever linked through our shared anguish and grief. But "the 9/11 families" are not a monolithic group that speaks in one voice, and nothing has made that more clear than the controversy over the Bush campaign ads.

It is one thing for individual family members to invoke the memory of all 3,000 victims as they take to the microphone or podium to show respect for our collective loss. It is another for them to attempt to stifle the debate over the future direction of our country by declaring that the images of 9/11 should be off-limits in the presidential race, and to do so under the rubric of "The Families of Sept. 11." They do not represent me. Nor do they represent those Americans who feel that Sept. 11 was a defining moment in the history of our country and who want to know how the current or future occupant of the Oval Office views the lessons of that day.

The images of Ground Zero, the Pentagon and Shanksville have been plastered over coffee mugs, T-shirts, placemats, book covers and postage stamps, all without a peep from many of these family members. I suspect that the real outrage over the ads has more to do with context than content. It’s not the pictures that disturb them so much as the person who is using them. This is demonstrated in their affiliation with Moveon.org, a rabidly anti-Bush group that sponsored a rally they held last Friday calling for the president to pull his ads off the air. But by disingenuously declaring themselves "non-partisan" and insisting that it is a matter of "taste," they retain a powerful weapon that they have learned to exploit to their advantage. They are "9/11 family members" and therefore enjoy the cloak of deference that has been graciously conferred upon them by the public, politicians and, most significantly, the media.

The leader of a lobbying group advised individuals at a 9/11 family meeting shortly after the attacks: "Make no mistake, you have a lot of power. Politicians are more afraid of you than you know." They know. As "relatives of 9/11 victims," they are virtually immune to challenge on the issue of who should have the loudest voice regarding the legacy of this national tragedy.
But this was a tragedy that was experienced and felt not just by us, but by all Americans. The American people responded to the horrors of that day with unflinching courage and an outpouring of love, support and empathy, the memory of which fills me with a gratitude that I can never repay. We families received cards, letters, homemade quilts bearing the names and likenesses of our lost loved ones, hand-lettered drawings from whole classrooms of children, and an unprecedented amount of charitable funds that sustained and continue to sustain those in need more than two years later.

These Americans, most of whom I will never have the privilege of meeting, also gave us something even more precious. When the planes hit the buildings and the towers fell, some of their sons and daughters balled up their fists and determined then and there that they wanted to "do something" about it. Those who donned the uniforms of our Armed Forces in order to fight the war on terrorism are not offended by the images of Ground Zero. On the contrary, they are moved and inspired by them.

Whatever these 9/11 families may think of the president’s foreign policy or the war in Iraq, I ask them to reconsider the language and tone of their statements. We should not tolerate or condone remarks such as those of the 9/11 relative who, so offended by the campaign ads, said that he "would vote for Saddam Hussein before I would vote for Bush." The insult was picked up and posted on Al-Jazeera’s Web site. In view of the sacrifice our troops have made on our behalf, this insensitivity to them and their families suggests a level of self-indulgence and ingratitude that shocks the conscience.

George W. Bush says that his presidency is inspired by an enduring obligation to those who lost their lives on that brutal September morning. The images of that day stand as an everlasting example of our country’s darkest day and finest hour. They are a vivid reminder of the strength and resilience of our great country. They belong to us all--including this president. Let the candidates make their own choices. I trust the American people.
Ms. Burlingame, a life-long Democrat, is the sister of Charles F. "Chic" Burlingame, III, captain of American Airlines flight 77, which was crashed at the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.
Amen!
Posted by:Frank G

#9  Hyper - my pleasure and moral obligation, thx
Frank
Posted by: Frank G   2004-3-8 10:38:44 PM  

#8  Thanks for the post Frank.

And fuck those partisan fucks.
Posted by: Hyper   2004-3-8 9:56:42 PM  

#7  I get taken to the registration page. BH you probably have a cookie on your computer from a previous registration.
Posted by: Phil B   2004-3-8 7:29:57 PM  

#6  It's obvious that they went TOOO far this time in their rhetoric. Why isn’t the alphabet channels publishing these letters along side the ready-rage ones?
Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter)   2004-3-8 3:42:57 PM  

#5  Isn't it obvious now how Kerry intends to get around the campaign finance restrictions? Look for some foundations funded by Soros to start making comments soon. But don't hold your breath waiting for the press to highlight the connections.
Posted by: Robert Crawford
Check the GOP page. They are trying to get an injunction against move.on et al ads.
Posted by: dataman1   2004-3-8 3:29:59 PM  

#4  BH - I linked past the reg page :-)
Posted by: Frank G   2004-3-8 3:10:24 PM  

#3  Isn't it obvious now how Kerry intends to get around the campaign finance restrictions? Look for some foundations funded by Soros to start making comments soon.

But don't hold your breath waiting for the press to highlight the connections.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-3-8 3:09:09 PM  

#2  The 9/11 Families group referenced in this article sounds like the group that is a pet project of the Tides Foundation. The Tides Foundation acts as a clearing house for the distribution of funds to leftist organizations so that donors are not directly tied to those groups. Just ask Ms Heinz-Kerry, who has contributed millions to the Tides Foundation. Of course, the media elbows each other to give these people air time at which they complain that Bush is stonewalling the 9/11 investigation. Next, we hear Kerry level the same charge. Pattern anybody?
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2004-3-8 2:53:53 PM  

#1  eh? I got in without a registration
Posted by: BH   2004-3-8 2:50:48 PM  

00:00