You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
MIRA sez al-Qaeda claim real deal, no ties to ETA
2004-03-13
Extracted from a longer article. The guy quoted here, named as Saad al-Fagui, is actually Saad al-Faqih, the head of the Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia, an al-Qaeda front organization. He’s also been remarkably up-front about the group’s alliance with Iran and Saudi backing in recent interviews.
Mr Acebes yesterday cast doubt on a letter purporting to come from al-Qaeda that claimed responsibility for the train bombings. "I myself have talked today with the British interior minister [David Blunkett] and [others, and] they all call very much into question the credibility of that communique and therefore we have to be very cautious about it," he said. But some Muslims who closely follow the terrorist network said the statement was authentic.
Closely following should be understood in the literal sense in the case of al-Faqih.
"The strategy of al-Qaeda is to punish anybody who has helped America," said Saad al-Fagui, a London-based Saudi dissident who has detailed knowledge of Islamist groups. He said al-Qaeda probably launched the attacks, and that the wording of the statement suggested it was genuine and that al-Qaeda was responsible for the attacks. But he rejected the suggestion made by some US officials that al-Qaeda may have allied itself with Eta. "For ideological, tactical and security reasons al-Qaeda never works with anybody else, because they fear they might be infiltrated by security services. They don’t like to relax their ideology, which is why they never dealt with Saddam Hussein," he said. Al-Qaeda and its affiliates had become increasingly adept at concealing their intentions from security services, he added.
That's an interesting collection of half, quarter, third, and other fraction truths...
European intelligence officials also reject the idea of a link between al-Qaeda and Eta. "It’s lunacy to think along those lines. It would be the death-knell of Eta, and there is absolutely no evidence of linkage between them," said an intelligence officer with extensive knowledge of Spain. He said no evidence had emerged linking Eta in the past with the Algerian Islamic group the GIA, some of whose supporters later joined al-Qaeda.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#3  Would it be a good idea to add "ETA" to the list of active words/names/phrases in the database?
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2004-3-13 2:24:39 PM  

#2  Saw piece on ABC News last night about a ETA member who got bagged last year. He had converted to islam and got bagged when he tried to fight in Checneya(?). Didn't get his name. Maybe some of the ETA youngone's converted, seems like the thing to do in Europe these days.
Posted by: Steve   2004-3-13 12:19:21 PM  

#1  I'm still leaning toward the joint ETA-AQ
operation but definatly seems to early to get any conclusive proof yet that we the public may know of.If AQ cells are operating with a large degree of autonamy as is thought then why shouldn't they ally up with others, the old your enamy is my eneamy thing probably would satnd here too. Some fuckker on the BBC saying this mornig that just because they used copper detonater cord or something it HAD to be AQ- wheres the fuckin logic in that but the van with the koran versus on tape and the unexploded bomb in it is very dodgy. Perhaps ETA have converted to the religion of peace eh. Interesting side note with the USA and allies launching operation Mountin Storm to the press officially yesterday, wondering if the 'go' day for that operation has been bought forward a few weeks because of this Train Booming or is it just due to better weather/intell etc?
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K   2004-3-13 6:55:19 AM  

00:01