You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
U.S. Demands Retraction for Abuse Photos
2004-05-06
The U.S. Embassy demanded a retraction Wednesday for photographs published in the Egyptian press that it said were faked pictures of American soldiers sexually abusing female prisoners in Iraq. But editors of two of the three publications involved said Wednesday they saw no grounds for a retraction. The editor-in-chief of the third publication, Al-Wafd, was not available. "We have done a thorough investigation of the origin of these photos and have conclusive evidence that they originated on a pornographic Web site," the embassy said in a statement. "They are clearly staged photos, done by actors, as the site itself states."
But try convincing people now.
"Their publication needlessly inflames an already heated atmosphere," the statement added, referring to Arab outrage over the revelation last weekend that U.S. soldiers had sexually humiliated male prisoners in Iraq. U.S. authorities have condemned the soldiers' actions and promised to bring them to justice. The editor of the Egyptian weekly Al-Osboa, Mustafa Bakri, dismissed the U.S. Embassy's complaint. His newspaper published at least one photograph of a man, purportedly an American soldier, taking sexual advantage of a woman as one of a series run across three pages on May 3. "We have published, maybe, one picture from the Internet, which was one of several pictures published by the media," Bakri told The Associated Press. "The kind of pictures on CBS made us believe that any other picture is authentic. Now the U.S. Embassy is speaking about pictures that were published only on the Internet. OK, let us agree on what CBS published, aren't they enough?"
If that's so, why use the fake ones?
The editor of Al-Mussawar, Makram Mohammed Ahmed, said he was not aware of the U.S. Embassy complaint. This week, his magazine published a picture of a partially naked woman with parts of her body blacked out. Ahmed said he would not rule out that fake pictures were circulating.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Anybody who belives Mohammed was Allan's prophet will easily fall for this pornography hoax too.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester TROLL   2004-05-06 3:57:53 AM  

#8  Anybody who belives Mohammed was Allan's prophet will easily fall for this pornography hoax too.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-05-06 3:57:53 AM  

#7  Anybody who falls for the lie that Mohammed was Allan's prophet will easily fall for these fake pictures too.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-05-06 10:51:37 PM  

#6  Michael - Egyptian Press? I thought you were talking about Lyndon LaRouche.
Posted by: BigEd   2004-05-06 2:02:37 PM  

#5  Didn't you guys read in the Egyptian press how Diana and dear Dodi were victims of Mossad? Or was it Queen Elizabeth? Or was it the Rothchild's? Or the Queen and the anit-Saudi Royal family factions based in London that are on the payroll of Mossad? Yeah, that's what I think I read.
Posted by: Michael   2004-05-06 1:50:43 PM  

#4  [Troll droppings deleted]
Posted by: Man Bites Dog TROLL   2004-05-06 3:57:53 AM  

#3  There are other strings to pull in Egypt. We need to come down on Mubarak to come down hard on those papers.
Posted by: Carl in N.H   2004-05-06 12:15:56 PM  

#2  Egypt shopuld receive squat from us in foreign aid. Send them a copy of that paper, and call it next year's payment in advance
Posted by: Frank G   2004-05-06 10:10:19 AM  

#1  Why bother? These people will believe anything and everything about the US, as long as it is bad. 99% believe 9/11 was a Mosad plot. Enough said.
Posted by: Rafael   2004-05-06 2:46:35 AM  

00:00