You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
UN Cover-up takes shape
2004-05-09
Scumbag at center of UN Oil for Food scam is kept on the payroll indefinitely to extend diplomatic immunity
Mr Sevan’s name was among 270 individuals and companies to appear on a list of recipients who allegedly skimmed at least £5.5 billion from the oil-for-food scheme. Documents found in the Iraqi oil ministry since Saddam’s fall suggest that Mr Sevan secretly received vouchers to sell 14.3 million barrels of oil, which would have yielded an illicit profit of £2 million. When asked about Mr Sevan’s whereabouts in recent weeks, the UN would say only that he was on holiday, pending his retirement in June at the age of 66. He is due to receive a £55,000 annual pension after serving the UN for 40 years.

Now, however, those plans have changed. According to UN officials contacted by The Sunday Telegraph last week, Mr Sevan will stay in office to co-operate with the inquiry by the former US Treasury Secretary, Paul Volcker. In the deal struck with Mr Annan, Mr Sevan will continue for the next three months and be paid a token $1 (55p) a year as a consultant, while continuing to enjoy diplomatic immunity. "We could extend it again, because Mr Sevan has assured us that he will co-operate fully with the inquiry," said a spokesman for the UN secretariat. Mr Sevan’s office, however, was criticised last week for sending at least three letters to potential witnesses demanding their silence.
Posted by:RWV

#5  This is the first article I have seen that touches on the real issue, which those those nice folks at the UN while espousing the virtues of international law are not in fact subject to any laws relating theft, corruption, intimidation of witnesses, etc.
Posted by: Phil B   2004-05-09 9:30:22 PM  

#4  Um, doesn't a country have to agree to Diplo. Immunity when a person enters? If we decline to abide by it, then they can just avoid coming to the US (and therefore the UN).
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2004-05-09 9:25:31 PM  

#3  "The cover-up always ends up being worse than the crime"
Only if someone is willing to keep investigating.
Posted by: James   2004-05-09 9:18:41 PM  

#2  Big mistake. The cover-up always ends up being worse than the crime.
Posted by: Mr. Davis   2004-05-09 9:02:37 PM  

#1  I think we could guess at the outline of this one before. Kofi seldom disappoints...
Posted by: Fred   2004-05-09 8:40:33 PM  

00:00