You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Karzai Goes West, Meets Ismail Khan
2004-05-10
President Hamid Karzai met Afghanistan's most powerful governor in his western stronghold Monday and delivered a tough message on disarming local militias and deploying government troops to unruly regions. Ismail Khan, the self-styled "emir of Herat," has criticized government plans to disarm tens of thousands of factional fighters in the coming weeks, saying this would leave a power vacuum while the national army remained weak. Karzai played down his differences with Khan, who is viewed by Western diplomats as a major obstacle to disarmament and to government attempts to extend its authority beyond Kabul, but said there would be no rolling back of policies. "There is only a procedural matter, that some consider to give (disarmament) some time, some consider (it) to be done quickly," he told reporters shortly before leaving Herat. "We have not discussed these issues today because there is no need to discuss them. There is an agreement already, a decision on it already."

Karzai was uncompromising when asked about the mixed reception to Afghan National Army (ANA) forces being stationed in what is probably Afghanistan's most stable city. "Kabul is part of Afghanistan, Herat is part of Afghanistan, Khost is part of Afghanistan, Paktika is part of Afghanistan, and the ANA can go wherever it wants." The government wants to disarm 40,000 factional fighters out of 100,000 nationwide by the end of June, a target that U.N. envoy to Afghanistan Jean Arnault said was in jeopardy due to resistance by leading commanders. In an interview with Reuters on the eve of Karzai's visit, Khan questioned why 1,500 national army troops had been sent to Herat after a clash in March in which his son, Civil Aviation Minister Mirwais Sadiq, was slain. Fears are growing that regional power brokers could flex their military muscle and influence landmark presidential and parliamentary elections scheduled for September.
They'd better do it soon, then. Quite to my surprise, Karzai seems to have outmaneuvered them. Somehow. I'm not sure how...
Posted by:Fred

#5  For the record, Khan is a title -- I know a Roseanne Klass "Khan", who demanded to some of these warlords (when she was Freedom House's Afghanistan chief) that she be khan and not khanoub, the female perjorative ... they just looked at each other and said "okay" :P
Posted by: Edward Yee   2004-05-10 9:41:23 PM  

#4  There's also the fact that the warlords were on our side in the fight against the Pakistanis Talibs. Ismail Khan and Dostum and Atta have their good points, and all three of them have at one time or another been actually heroic. If Massoud hadn't been assassinated, the government in Kabul would probably look a lot different than it does, and that each of them would have more power than he does now, with an entirely different power dynamic.
Posted by: Fred   2004-05-10 8:26:48 PM  

#3  Gotta disagree, Steve. Prior to Sadiq, was ANY warlord type physically attacked? (as opposed to Taliban) Not one. Khan, Dostum, Shirzai, Atta, etc are ALL alive and in good health. But theyve been progressively defanged. Not saying force hasnt been important - the USE of force in the Pashtun areas has given Karzai his base (outside of Kabul) - the Pashtun provinces have been his Normandy, as Kabul was his Isle de France. But in dealing with his dukes and counts, he has relied more on subtlety and political skill, supplemented by occasional threat of force, not blasting away. He has proven as masterful as any Valois. Im not sure that this is generalizable beyond Afghanistan, but I think there are lessons to be learned here. Lessons which the simple minded on both right and left and desperately need.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-05-10 4:57:15 PM  

#2  And a hotline to CENTCOM's targeting cell.
Posted by: Steve   2004-05-10 4:49:48 PM  

#1  Patience. Moderation. Subtlety. A willingness to cut deals. Nuance. Flexibility.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-05-10 4:29:09 PM  

00:00