You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Admits Importing Parts for Uranium
2004-06-02
In a reversal, Iran has acknowledged importing parts for advanced centrifuges that can be used to enrich uranium, the U.N. atomic watchdog agency said Tuesday in a confidential report obtained by The Associated Press.
Thus confirming what we already knew.
The report by the head of the U.N. atomic watchdog agency credited Iran with more nuclear openness but said questions remained about nearly two decades of covert activities first revealed nearly two years ago. The dossier was issued for the June 14 meeting of the IAEA's 35-nation board of governors that has wrestled for more than a year about what to do about what that the United States and its allies say is a weapons program. In an interview with The Associated Press before the report was leaked, U.S. Undersecretary of State John R. Bolton accused Tehran of engaging in "denial and deception." "We are and have been for some time convinced that they are pursuing a clandestine program to acquire nuclear weapons," he said. Bolton, who was at a review conference of the U.S.-launched Proliferation Security Initiative to stop the spread of weapons of mass destruction, said Washington was determined to have it answer to the U.N. Security Council. While the report did not appear critical enough of Iran to marshal strong support at the board meeting for such a move, it also was far from the clean bill of health Tehran had hoped for in making a case that the books should be closed on its nuclear activities. Mohamed ElBaradei, the IAEA chief, said earlier Tuesday his agency had not found proof to date of a concrete link between Iran's nuclear activities and its military program, but "it was premature to make a judgment."
Did he take lessons from Blixie, or vice-versa?
Posted by:Steve White

#4  The equation is very simple: if Israel takes a WMD attack then Bye, Bye Mecca and Medinah.
Posted by: JFM   2004-06-02 2:23:46 PM  

#3  NMM, I prefer Devil's Food cake myself. I worry not about the Iran bomb. Israeli security is tight. US security is getting tighter. The Persians are most likely to blow up Arabs or Europeans who seem quite happy to arm the Mullah's. The Iranians will have trouble with their delivery system because most rudimentary nuclear weapons cannot be mounted on a motorcycle of death. If the Iranians decide to use a missile, they will be using NK guidance technology. If Israel is the target, the Israelis are quite safe but the Syrians and Saudis should be quite concerned. By the time our guidance technology trickles down to NK through China by way of the EU, the death-star will be operational.

As for the ambivalence of the leaders of the countries that most are most likely too get the gamma dose, I chalk it up to the old saying: “The gods blind those they want to destroy.”
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-06-02 3:14:42 AM  

#2  yes anonymous--along with yellow cake from Niger
Posted by: Not Mike Moore   2004-06-02 2:31:33 AM  

#1  i wonder if they imported said equipment from Iraq.
Posted by: Anonymous   2004-06-02 1:15:05 AM  

00:00