You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Iraqis Flexing Their Political Muscles
2004-06-17
With two weeks to go until full sovereignty, Iraqis already are running more than half the government's ministries, making key decisions, setting policy and managing their own budgets without direction from the U.S.-led coalition. As of this week, Iraqis are in full control of 15 of the 26 ministries - including the key departments of oil, foreign affairs, health, education, public works and municipalities, and transportation - even before the June 30 transfer of sovereignty, coalition officials say. Over the next two weeks, the remaining ministries will assume full powers in such critical fields as defense, communications, electricity and finance.
Nice of the AP to notice.
At the same time, Iraq's new leaders are beginning to assert their independence, taking public stands different from their American backers on issues including the fate of Saddam Hussein, security and control over key public property. The differences have not approached a serious breach and could simply reflect the fact that no Iraqi politician wants to be seen by his own people - or the wider Arab world - as a Washington puppet.
Sure, no problem with that.
American officials in Iraq have publicly downplayed any talk of differences with the new government, which the United States and the United Nations put together to take power until national elections planned by Jan. 31. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz has arrived in Baghdad to discuss the fine points of the power transfer and details of the relationship between the United States and the new government after June 30. The U.S.-run Coalition Provisional Authority, which assumed supreme power in Iraq after the collapse of Saddam's regime, disappears with the sovereignty transfer and a U.S. Embassy will begin functioning. "These talks are just the beginning of a new relationship between the government of Iraq and the members of the coalition," a coalition statement said Wednesday after Wolfowitz's first day of talks with Prime Minister Iyad Allawi and others. "The constructive and positive atmosphere of the talks reflects the nature of this new relationship - a partnership based on common objectives and assessments."

Nevertheless, recent statements by Allawi, President Ghazi al-Yawer and others indicate that the new Iraqi leaders do not intend to be pushovers - even if they support many U.S. policy goals. There are differences over the issue of Saddam, who has been held in American custody since he was captured by U.S. soldiers in December near Tikrit. In a series of interviews, Allawi said the new government expected to take control of Saddam with the return of sovereignty. Salem Chalabi, who is in charge of setting up a special tribunal to try members of the ousted regime, went even further Tuesday, telling The Associated Press he expected criminal charges to be filed against the deposed leader by June 30. President Bush, however, said Tuesday the United States was working with the Iraqis on the terms of handing over Saddam and making sure there was "appropriate security." "I want to make sure that when sovereignty is transferred, Saddam Hussein stays in jail," Bush told reporters. U.S. Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, coalition deputy operations chief, said American and Iraqi authorities were discussing what to do about Saddam and other prisoners after the Iraqis assume sovereignty. "There have been some novel thoughts about how that can be done jointly, should it be done jointly, in what manner can it be done jointly," Kimmitt said. Kimmitt refused to elaborate. Joint custody could include both Americans and Iraqis running prisons together or the Americans holding Saddam and other top prisoners on behalf of the Iraqi administration.
That works as long as we vet the Iraqi guards. And, sad to say, our own.
Posted by:Steve White

#8  Oh, give it a rest, dogbite. Nothing about you is hard, including your line.

Dumbkopf.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-06-17 10:21:50 PM  

#7  Only one hardliner posts here, and that is me.

Such arrogance. Such vanity. Is that you, Sen. Kerry?
Posted by: Raj   2004-06-17 12:39:11 PM  

#6  I think he's using "hardliner" as a synonym for "asshat".
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-06-17 12:10:12 PM  

#5  only hardliner?
what does that make me then?
a poser or something ?
Posted by: dcreeper   2004-06-17 11:57:40 AM  

#4  Deny Deny Deny:
By facilitating butchery of Secularism in Iraq, faith-based' Bush-Powell are delivering Iraq to the same animals who perpetrated the 9-11 genocide. At last notice, Fallujah is an al-Qaeda city, which will be a base for anti-American operations, on a global scale. At last count, al-Sadr has the support of 67% of all Iraqis (much higher if the Kurd, Turkemen, Christian, Assyrians, etc that faith-based' Bush-Powell have written off in favor of Sunni/Shiite elites, are excluded).
Only one hardliner posts here, and that is me.
Posted by: Dog Bites Trolls   2004-06-17 10:45:58 AM  

#3  V- actually from what I see the left is taking the exact opposite tack - theyre playing up Allawis CIA ties, a rumor (false?) that Brahimi was going to resign due to frustration at being "outmaneuvered" by the CPA and IGC, etc. They are essentially ignoring disputes between the Iraqi Interim Govt and the US, since it doesnt fit their agenda. The only folks I see expressing frustration with IGC/IIG differences with the US are conservative pessimists, like Tacitus (who, unlike the left, is honest enough to admit they exist, but is frustrated that a strategy other than "empire" is being pursued)
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-06-17 9:48:00 AM  

#2  Verlaine - well said.

Iraq does what we intended for it to do and the AP spins it as a failure and a slap. I've noticed that the GOP is hitting hard the theme that the Dumbdownocrats are pessimists v/s GW and Repub's are optimists.

Personally, I think that's brilliant. Not much that Dummy's can do, since pessimism has been their campaign theme. Making their greatest strength their weakness.

In fact, once you get into the mindset - Dim's as pessimists, Repub's as optimists - this AP article plays right into GOP scheme.
Posted by: B   2004-06-17 8:04:29 AM  

#1  Unless some juicier -- and dumber -- theme becomes the latest teen craze for the media, I've been expecting the "Iraqi government at odds with the US" thing to become the newest negative banner. Along with keeping up the pro-wrestling-type excitement over familiar attacks on police and infrastructure that won't change a thing in the long run. The additional irony in the "US, Iraq at odds" negative theme, obviously, is that it's mostly good news -- we don't want the damn place, PLEASE do run it, will you? Yet the unavoidable, desirable, and inconsequential differences with Iraq's temporary bosses will be portrayed as just the next bump in the long difficult path .... that -- oops -- is leading to Iraqi independence and sovereignty.
Posted by: Verlaine   2004-06-17 2:04:11 AM  

00:00