You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Fallujah Terrorists
2004-06-19
Abdul Rahman Al-Rashid
I recently wrote an article entitled “Fallujah’s Revolutionaries” but it didn’t appeal to many, perhaps because they weren’t able to see the connection or maybe because they admired the political appeal of those far-off events. The article was a commentary on the killing of foreign civilians, among whom were Americans working in the construction sector, and a young man slaughtered in front of the cameras. The crimes committed in Fallujah were portrayed as heroic actions and these groups’ defensive claims and political narrative have become pervasive in the Arab region, which does not differentiate between the right to resistance and the crime of killing civilians. That dangerous omission led to daily celebrations of these atrocities in the Arab media including in Saudi Arabia.

The reason I single out the media for criticism is simple: The current war is essentially one of ideas, with the media as willing tools. The terrorists have managed to capture the emotions of the media and exploit them in their grand political scheme. Their aim is on one hand to strike at foreigners — an important prop to our to society — and on the other to convince the public that these are legitimate acts. Kidnapping a hundred or killing a thousand people doesn’t topple a regime, a fact they are well aware of. It is in the publicity for such acts that the leverage can be found, and that is why the media have been roped into their war.

We are on the threshold of a new era of media-savvy terrorism. The terrorists’ victims are civilians, and they are being stabbed with the same knives that have attacked Lebanese, Sudanese, Egyptians and Saudi women and children in the Kingdom, by the same extremists. The atrocities committed in Algeria 14 years ago are a good example because both mentality and tactics were similar. The criminals would attack “soft targets” like women and children by disguising themselves as policemen, setting up security roadblocks or entering girls’ schools or foreigners’ homes. The organization’s propaganda machine tried to gloss the crimes with religious commands and publish justifications and false claims against the victims. In most of the countries where they surfaced, such as Egypt and Tunisia, these bloody groups eventually disappeared. In Algeria many members of these groups surrendered without achieving any of their aims.

Like colorblind bulls, the media enthusiastically generalize, not realizing that the internal fallout from talk abroad is going to be heavy and dangerous. The extremist line has been so widely publicized that it is now being parroted by any Tom, Dick and Harry without being fully understood, and they thence find their way into the audio and videotapes the murderers have taken to posting on their websites.
Posted by:Fred

#12  good perspective, but the "Tom, Dick, and Harry" reference sounds like this was meant only for our (US) consumption

I thought "Tom, Dick, and Harry" was an English idiom.
Posted by: Pappy   2004-06-19 11:37:48 PM  

#11  Yes, heck of a clip, Edward. Thanks for posting it. I presume Fallujah? Or Where?

Best Wishes,
Posted by: Traveller   2004-06-19 11:06:10 PM  

#10  Edward, I guess we won't be seeing this in Michael Moore's latest tripe? cooool
Posted by: Frank G   2004-06-19 9:21:43 PM  

#9  "Not work-safe"? The jihadi kept his clothes on for the entire clip. What's not work safe about it?

The fact that his brainless skull hit the street with a beautiful thud doesn't make the video NSFW.

Zenster, in the future you may wish to evaluate your pomposity.

Edward, where was this video shot?
Posted by: Parabellum   2004-06-19 8:57:06 PM  

#8  The media is not aimless, unknowing pawns for terrorists to manipulate, although it is curious that the NYT, WaPo, and Boston Globe seem to be their pipe organ. Moreover, these outlets only appeal to the gullable libs who buy into their shit.
Posted by: Capt America   2004-06-19 4:45:54 PM  

#7  Edward, in the future you may wish include an advisory that this link is not work-safe.
Posted by: Zenster   2004-06-19 2:07:48 PM  

#6  Ed: A beauty. Allahu Akbar indeed.
Posted by: Howard UK   2004-06-19 2:02:56 PM  

#5  Try this, Barbara?
Posted by: Edward Yee   2004-06-19 12:11:32 PM  

#4  
The reason I single out the media for criticism is simple: The current war is essentially one of ideas, with the media as willing tools. [emphasis added]
Ain't it the truth! And that includes most of the American media. I'd love to hear Brokaw/Rather/Jennings, etc., explain away this one.

I wish I knew more about this guy - where does he live, how is he able to get away with such columns without being killed, etc.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-06-19 10:52:22 AM  

#3  Edward - link broken; displays a "406" message.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-06-19 10:48:22 AM  

#2  good perspective, but the "Tom, Dick, and Harry" reference sounds like this was meant only for our (US) consumption
Posted by: Frank G   2004-06-19 10:15:55 AM  

#1  My preferred perspective on Fallujah, also known as "PWN3D"
Posted by: Edward Yee   2004-06-19 9:37:05 AM  

00:00