You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Central Asia
Narcotics Addiction and AIDS Spread in Central Asia
2004-06-22
From Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty
.... A 2002 report provides the UN’s latest estimates on the number of drug users in the region. According to the report -- based on an assessment launched in 2000 -- the number of drug addicts in Kazakhstan, a country of some 15 million, is estimated to be as high as 186,000. Neighboring Kyrgyzstan is estimated to have as many as 100,000 drug users out of 5 million people. The number of drug users in Tajikistan, a country of 6 million, is believed to be as high as 55,000. In Uzbekistan, the most populous Central Asia country with 25 million people, the number was estimated at between 65,000 and 91,000. No figures were available on Turkmenistan ... for lack of cooperation with the international community in its fight against illicit drugs.

James Callahan, the regional director of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), told RFE/RL that the drug problem has worsened in the region, particularly over the past two years .... the situation is continuing to deteriorate or get worse again because of the increasing traffic from Afghanistan." ....

An additional problem is that heroin addicts in Central Asia use the drug intravenously -- something that has contributed to one of the world’s fastest-growing infection rates of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. .... In 1995, 88 persons were officially registered as being infected with HIV/AIDS in the region. In 2003, reported infections jumped to more than 6,700. These are only the registered cases. Experts warn the real figures are significantly higher. The World Bank estimates that the real number of HIV-positive cases in Central Asia most likely approaches 90,000. ...
Posted by:Mike Sylwester

#5  Mike's choice of articles and editorializing is curious, to say the least.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-06-23 9:11:41 AM  

#4  I agree with #1's question ie. what's the point of posting this article? It would appear that many Muslims in back water countries bordering Afghanistan are getting hooked on heroin and are getting AIDS. Indeed, the article states:
Cultivation of opium -- the raw material for heroin -- was banned in Afghanistan under the five-year rule of the Taliban militia. But since the fall of the regime following the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, heroin production has once again rocketed in Afghanistan.

So is the poster suggesting that this a new front on the West's WOT - turning potential Muslim jihadists into AIDS ridden drug addicts? Inquiring minds want to know...
Posted by: rex   2004-06-22 11:06:40 PM  

#3  Perhaps it's my youthful indulgence in bad lit'rature, but I suspect that when the WoT is over we're going to find Gharlane of Eddore behind it all. File this part under "Zabriska."
Posted by: Fred   2004-06-22 10:38:53 PM  

#2  Never mind. The "past two years" emphasis makes it clear
Posted by: Pappy   2004-06-22 9:00:47 PM  

#1  How come we get editorial emphasis on this article, but nary a thing w/regards your postings regarding Iraq?
Posted by: Pappy   2004-06-22 8:59:10 PM  

00:00