Submit your comments on this article |
Britain |
UK Tragedy : Live babies being born after abortions |
2004-06-23 |
EFL Leading doctors today called for a major overhaul to avoid babies being born alive after abortions. Pregnancy expert Professor Stuart Campbell has demanded rules should be tightened after it was revealed that at least nine babies are known to have survived terminations in recent years. He said injections that were supposed to end their lives in the womb failed to do so - and he called for stricter regulations to be enforced on the methods of abortion. At least he isnât demanding retroactive measures. |
Posted by:Super Hose |
#11 Hey, She-Troll from #7! Youâve got to be joking . . . but I know there really are people who think just like what you wrote! You quote from the article, âIt is really unfair on the nurses and the parents to see the baby making some sort of movement after birth.â and also that âGuidance issued by the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists states that a legal abortion must not be allowed to result in a live birth.â Yuuucccck! and spew! The unborn aborted are clearly human; we can check their DNA and it shows that they are (at a minimum, at least, genetically) human. The unborn also are clearly alive; the article above (and your little listing of abortion techniques) easily proves that point by so strongly emphasizing how important it is to the multi-billion dollar abortion industry to kill the unborn. The only question about the unborn, living humans who are being aborted is whether they have personhood -- which would give the unborns legal protections against: Suction, Dilatation & Curettage (D&C), Dilatation & Evacuation (D&E), D & X (Partial Birth), Salt Poisoning, Prostaglandin Abortions, and/or Hysterotomy. You should know that the genius of our nationâs leaders resolved that sticky question long ago (although this constitutional resolution is completely ignored by the âmodernâ federal Courts): All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1. Persons are persons before they are born or naturalized, and one need not be a citizen to obtain the right to have the government safeguard your life. âAh,â you might reply, âsurely the framers of the XIV Amendment had no concept of abortion and the unborn,â but youâd be wrong. Feminist greats like Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Mattie Brinkerhoff and Sarah Norton all wrote about this problem right about the time the XIV Amendment was being ratified by the states. They called it child murder. |
Posted by: cingold 2004-06-23 9:21:43 PM |
#10 ima thinking that was sarcasm? itn not very nice to read. |
Posted by: muck4doo 2004-06-23 7:46:07 PM |
#9 Hard to tell which side of the argument you're really on, ST. Either way, it wasn't too persuasive if that was your intent. |
Posted by: Mr. Davis 2004-06-23 7:20:00 PM |
#8 Tell me you don't live in this country, please! You are SCUM, She-Troll (perfect name for you!). How about the right to choose to birth control? How about at least getting an abortion--if you must--before the foetus (the term you baby murderers love to use instead of "baby") is viable outside of the womb? Partial birth abortion is MURDER and it's quite right that the Bush Administration and Conservative judges are moving to end it! |
Posted by: Jen 2004-06-23 7:18:48 PM |
#7 "It is really unfair on the nurses and the parents to see the baby making some sort of movement after birthâ . . . Guidance issued by the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists states that a legal abortion must not be allowed to result in a live birth. I totally agree. Itâs a hard enough job without having to be âconfrontedâ with this. Besides, I say fuck the "babies"! They have no ability to live outside help from others, so their lives are at our disposal. Every civilized woman (and her partner) has a RIGHT TO CHOOSE one of the following options to rid themselves of unwanted, unplanned pregnancies . Also, if a woman wants to avoid a "live birth problem" she should choose from among the first few types, depending on the trimester. We have a right to know what we choose: Suction The abortionist paralyzes the cervix. A hollow plastic tube with a knife-like tip is inserted into the uterus. The tube is connected to a pump with a suction force 29 times more powerful than a home vacuum cleaner. The procedure tears the Dilatation & Curettage (D&C) Used during the first 10 weeks (uncommon). This is similar to the suction procedure except that the abortionist inserts a curette, a loop-shaped steel knife up into the uterus. The placenta is cut, and Dilatation & Evacuation (D&E) Performed during the second trimester (4-6 months) of pregnancy. This method has largely replaced saline and chemical abortions, which too frequently resulted in live births. A pliers-like instrument is needed because the D & X (Partial Birth) Also used for advanced pregnancies. The cervix is dilated to allow passage of a ring forceps. A foot or lower leg is located and pulled into the vagina.  The LIVE BIRTH PROBLEMS: Salt Poisoning a.k.a. "Candy Apple Babies:" Most often used after the first trimester (first three months). The abortionist injects a strong salt solution directly into the amniotic sac (fluid surrounding the baby). The Prostaglandin Abortions The hormone produces a violent labor and delivery of whatever size Hysterotomy This method is usually used late in pregnancy and is likened to an "early" Caesarian section. The mother's abdomen and uterus are surgically opened and the Several thousand abortions occur everyday--so what if sometimes the providers miss the boat. The woman has already made her protected choice, so it's not her concern at that point. (the above info from a "pro-life" (sorry) i.e. anti-abortion website but it outlines the choices concisely--I have edited out "pro-life" terminology, etc., where appropriate) Be educated on this, or the conservatives will have their way via Supreme Court appointments. |
Posted by: She-Troll 2004-06-23 7:12:29 PM |
#6 Good thing you don't have the quantity of lawyers we have in the United States. |
Posted by: eLarson 2004-06-23 1:51:41 PM |
#5 heh. I would be sooo divorced if I ever took that job! I'm not coming out for or against, I just thought that the article was written... oddly. It's like, "Dammit! Another one got through!" |
Posted by: BH 2004-06-23 1:17:59 PM |
#4 Have you considered the PR field BH? That was highly offensive and yet, and yet very effective. :) |
Posted by: Shipman 2004-06-23 11:43:58 AM |
#3 Think of the advertising potential. "Your baby dead, or your money back!" |
Posted by: BH 2004-06-23 10:12:42 AM |
#2 We feed them to the muzzies ;) |
Posted by: Howard UK 2004-06-23 9:55:56 AM |
#1 eewwww |
Posted by: B 2004-06-23 8:45:47 AM |