You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Bush to Seek European Support in Iraq
2004-06-26
Five days before the transfer of power in Baghdad, President Bush opened a European trip Friday with growing confidence that NATO would take a bigger role in Iraq despite reservations from France and Germany. The administration expects NATO, at a summit in Turkey, will pledge military training and equipment, answering an urgent plea from Iyad Allawi, prime minister of Iraq's interim government, for NATO assistance "to defeat the terrorist threat and reduce reliance on foreign forces."
This trip is just for show, right?
European Union External Affairs Commissioner Chris Patten said persistent violence could cause Iraq to unravel. "All of us in the international community are worried that the violence directed against moderate leadership in each of the communities and directed against attempts at long-term, sustainable reconstruction ... could lead to Iraq flying apart in the next few months," Patten said. He said the EU is "absolutely determined" to help reconstruct Iraq and ensure that elections are held but that violence could derail those goals.
Which is why NATO is leaping to help out ... oh right.
The United States expects NATO to make a broad commitment to training Iraqi forces - inside and outside Iraq - and to determine how to meet specific needs after consulting with Baghdad. "While I don't think this will be very specific, we would certainly hope that NATO is prepared to make a commitment to the training of Iraqi forces in order to answer Allawi," said a senior official with Bush on Air Force One. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity in order not to upstage Bush, expressed confidence about the outcome. In an interview aired Friday with Ireland's RTE television, Bush defended his decision to invade Iraq and insisted that most of Europe backed the move. "What was it like Sept. 11, 2001?" he said. "I wouldn't have made the decisions I did if I didn't believe the world would be better. Why would I put people in harm's way if I didn't believe the world would be better?" "History will judge what I'm about," the president said. He said, "Most of Europe supported the decision in Iraq. Really what you're talking about is France, isn't it? And they didn't agree with my decision. They did vote for the U.N. Security Council resolution. ... We just had a difference of opinion about whether, when you say something, you mean it."
The welt on your face will take some time to fade, Jacques.
In a separate interview with Turkey's private NTV television, Bush said it was unlikely that NATO countries would contribute additional troops to Iraq but he was hopeful some would help train Iraqi forces.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  I'd accuse him of being sophisticated. We don't see the diplo wars going on, but they're not thrashing about in the dark. Politix is a matter of what's possible, not a matter of what we'd like to see right now, no waiting. I don't think he's a global government kind of guy, and if he stopped sending money to the UN the domestic repercussions at this point would probably paralyze the administration. I have a lot of confidence in him and his team.
Posted by: Fred   2004-06-26 10:00:02 AM  

#6  GWB is a nice man but I don't think anyone would accuse him of being sophisticated. You are dreaming, Mr. Davis.

There will be no withdrawal of US troops from UN peace keeping missions. GWB is a global government type of guy. He continues to send US $ to the UN like it grows on trees.

There is no need to use this elaborate game playing to show Iraqis that the EU doesn't care - GWB could simply publicize all the EU/UN corruption and entanglements in the oil-for-food scandal, yes? Instead, Bremer is dragging his feet on releasing the documents, despite pressure from Iraqis.
Posted by: rex   2004-06-26 3:34:08 AM  

#5  Mr. Davis, t'anks for the explanation. It all makes sense now! I guess 'W' learned purty good, eh smn?
Posted by: Steve White   2004-06-26 1:56:49 AM  

#4  Learn what smn?

Europe is in denial. Poor sods.

Verlain, well said!
Posted by: Lucky   2004-06-26 1:14:53 AM  

#3  "We just had a difference of opinion about whether, when you say something, you mean it." Actually a pretty nice snub -- agreed!

Patten is verminous. So glad to hear his useless organization is "absolutely determined" to reconstruct Iraq. Now I feel better. Geez.

I am puzzled a bit, though, by these repeated useless symbolic overtures to Europe. Most of Europe caved long ago on things that matter -- debt forgiveness, training of Iraqi security forces, etc. This of course was mostly ignored by the media. So please let's put an end to the "reconciliation" b.s. and the trolling for "support" that appears too trivial to be material to the outcome or US burden.
Posted by: Verlaine   2004-06-26 12:33:38 AM  

#2  This is demonstrate to the Iraqis that Euros don't care about them and never have and to set the Euros up for the withdrawal of U. S. troops from EU favored peacekeeping missions like Bosnia and Kosovo due to lack of ICC indemnification.
Posted by: Mr. Davis   2004-06-26 12:28:59 AM  

#1  Yea Right! When will "W" learn!
Posted by: smn   2004-06-26 12:21:19 AM  

00:00