You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
9/11 report good but incomplete
2004-07-28
In establishing how the government failed to prevent the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the 9/11 Commission Report is excellent. Its grasp of some details, however, is less than reassuring - particularly details about Saudi Arabia, which it calls, in a gross understatement, "a problematic ally in combating Islamic extremism." Perhaps even more startling is the report's conclusion that the panel has "found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually" helped to finance Al Qaeda.
"No, no! The Emperor's not nekkid! The fabric's just too fine for the common folks to make out!"
It does say that unnamed wealthy Saudi sympathizers, and leading Saudi charities, sent money to the terror group. But the report fails to mine any of the widely available reporting and research that establishes the degree to which many of the suspect charities cited by the United States are controlled directly by the Saudi government or some of its ministers. The 9/11 panel misses an opportunity, for example, to more fully explore an intelligence coup in 2002, when American agents in Bosnia retrieved computer files of the so-called Golden Chain, a group of Osama bin Laden's early financial supporters.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#4  The 9/11 report is little more than warmed up intelligence stew. Where did the commissioners and their staff gather their information from? The same intel community that they know castigate.
Posted by: Capt America   2004-07-28 10:46:08 AM  

#3  I spent most of last weekend reading the Commission report, and am now about a third of the way through it. I am not impressed: while there are a lot of details I didn't know before, some of them interesting, so far I haven't encountered ANYTHING of major importance that I didn't already know.

Right now I'm wondering whether the remainder of the report will be worth my time.
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-07-28 6:47:09 AM  

#2  Dan, where's your take on the report? After your dissection of the interim staff thingie, I'm very curious.
Posted by: someone   2004-07-28 3:03:23 AM  

#1  Hell Dan, whats left to be said? They have no gov. They have a thingy!
Posted by: Lucky   2004-07-28 1:34:01 AM  

00:00