You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: Horn
Sudanese government sez intervention in Darfur will be met with force
2004-07-28
SUDAN warned yesterday it would use force against any attempt at outside military intervention in crisis-torn Darfur. Australia and New Zealand are considering a UN request for military personnel to join a mission there and Britain has said it could send 5000 troops.
I don't think that's something Omar really wants to do...
Ibrahim Ahmed Omar, secretary-general of the ruling National Congress Party, warned that force would be met by force. "Anybody who contemplates imposing his opinion by force will be confronted by force," he said. "Any power that intervenes in Darfur will be a loser."
Not as big a loser as Khartoum, even if the power was the Phrench. Brits, Aussies, Merkins — hang it up. Go sit in your mosques and knit boom belts...
Also yesterday, a group calling itself Mohammed's army called on Muslims to prepare to fight Western forces. "We call upon you to speedily head towards Darfur and dig deep into the ground mass graves prepared for the crusader army," the previously unknown group said. But a Darfur rebel movement in opposition to the Government called for a rapid deployment of international troops. The US Congress unanimously passed a resolution last week describing the atrocities committed in Darfur as genocide.
Didn't defer to Kofi's opinion that it's... ummm... something else, huh?
It called on the White House to lead international efforts to intervene. An official quoted Mr Omar as saying Sudan was capable of solving its own problems: "The National Congress firmly rejects any foreign threats targeting Sudan and its people and is opposed to any foreign intervention."
"We have the right to kill as many of our citizens as we like, in whatever manner we please!"
Khartoum has brushed off criticism it is not doing enough for Darfur people and pledged to improve the access of international aid agencies. But Abdel Wahed Mohammed Nur, spokesman for the rebel Sudan Liberation Army said: "We are asking the United States, the United Nations Secretary-General, the European Union and the African Union for the urgent deployment of troops in the coming days to ensure the delivery of food aid to millions of refugees."
Posted by:Dan Darling

#6  Met with force? Man, and there I was, hoping that it would be met with hugs, kisses and dancing girls.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-07-28 4:05:47 PM  

#5  Met with force...we can only hope and pray those Islamo-pigs meet the 101st Airborne in force. Maybe the idiot thinks he is dealing with unarmed, starving women and children.

Posted by: anymouse   2004-07-28 3:52:00 PM  

#4  Gasp! Not the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch - anything but the Holy Hand Grenada of Antioch.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-07-28 3:33:58 PM  

#3  agreed BH

if the US armed and trained 10.000 Darfur and provided even modest air cover, they would wipe the Sudanese army's butt.
Posted by: Anonymous5922   2004-07-28 3:05:23 PM  

#2  Yeah, Bush should be careful or he may have the 'Mother of all Battles'(tm) on his hands!
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-07-28 3:05:07 PM  

#1  "Any power that intervenes in Darfur will be a loser."

Yes, Sudan's reputation as a superpower is richly deserved.

/sarcasm
Posted by: BH   2004-07-28 2:56:35 PM  

00:00