| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Do you want to sing Waterloo or fight it? |
| 2004-08-17 |
| Steyn of course 'We won't come back till it's over/Over There!' sang America's doughboys, marching off to war in 1917. In the Second World War, they had other songs to sing, which is just as well because, even though the World War was over over there 60 years ago, and the Cold War was over 15 years ago, only now are the Yanks heading home. In the largest military realignment in years, Washington plans to withdraw 70,000 troops plus 100,000 family members and support personnel from overseas US bases. That means, for the most part, from Europe. This will undoubtedly be welcome news to the likes of Goran Persson, the Swedish prime minister, who famously declared that the purpose of the European Union is that "it's one of the few institutions we can develop as a balance to US world domination". It must surely be awfully embarrassing to be the first superpower in history to be permanently garrisoned by your principal rival superpower. But it's also grand news for those of us who've long argued that America's six-decade security guarantee to Europe has been a massive strategic error. The basic flaw in the Atlantic "alliance" is that, for almost all its participants, the free world is a free lunch: a defence pact of wealthy nations in which only one guy picks up the tab. I said as much in a Canadian column I wrote on 9/11, and a few weeks later the dominion's deputy prime minister, John Manley, conceded that his country was dining in the best restaurants without paying its way: as he put it, "You can't just sit at the G8 table and then, when the bill comes, go to the washroom." But in Nato, for generations, whenever the bill's come, there's been a stampede to the washroom, not just from the Canadians but the Continentals, too. |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #2 The Americans helped build a continent in which you could sing Waterloo rather than fight it I take it Steyn's not a big ABBA fan... |
| Posted by: Raj 2004-08-17 1:48:53 PM |
| #1 Up until recently, there has been no incentive for Europe (or South Korea, for that matter) to discontinue its freeloading of American military forces for protection. It is tolerating the American presence as a kind of 'stupid muscle' that is serving a master's greater needs: enhancing its self-important image and providing cover for the FANTASY that it has a better way to solve problems than by using military force to confront evil. Europe thinks it's funny that we even believe in such a thing as evil acts or bad guys. Of course, with others defending it, it has had little incentive to acknowledge that you have to fight (or flee) when confronted by predators-little incentive, that is, until now. Let's see, Grasshopper, whether you remember the life lesson of survival of the fittest. |
| Posted by: jules 187 2004-08-17 12:19:19 PM |