You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Professor Accuses Doctors in Iraq Abuse
2004-08-20
LONDON (AP) - Doctors working for the U.S. military in Iraq collaborated with interrogators in the abuse of detainees at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison, profoundly breaching medical ethics and human rights, a bioethicist charges in The Lancet medical journal.
As a doc, I can tell you that the Lancet doesn't have the best reputation.
In a scathing analysis of the behavior of military doctors, nurses and medics, University of Minnesota professor Steven Miles calls for a reform of military medicine and an official investigation into the role played by physicians and other medical staff in the torture scandal.
The good Dr. Miles is a member-in-standing of the LLL; consider when reviewing this.
He cites evidence that doctors or medics falsified death certificates to cover up homicides, hid evidence of beatings and revived a prisoner so he could be further tortured. No reports of abuses were initiated by medical personnel until the official investigation into Abu Ghraib began, he found. "The medical system collaborated with designing and implementing psychologically and physically coercive interrogations," Miles said in this week's edition of Lancet. "Army officials stated that a physician and a psychiatrist helped design, approve and monitor interrogations at Abu Ghraib."

The analysis does not shed light on how many doctors were involved or how widespread the problem of medical complicity was, aspects that Miles said he is now investigating.
But you couldn't hold off publishing til you did a proper analysis, now could you.
A U.S. military spokesman said the incidents recounted by Miles came primarily from the Pentagon's own investigation of the abuses. "Many of these cases remain under investigation and charges will be brought against any individual where there is evidence of abuse," said Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, U.S. Army spokesman for detainee operations in Iraq.

In a related matter, two military officials in Washington said Thursday that a high-level Army inquiry will cite medical personnel who knew of abuse at Abu Ghraib but did not report it up the chain of command. The inquiry also will criticize senior U.S. commanders for a lack of leadership that allowed abuses to occur, but finds no evidence they ordered the abuse, said the sources, who spoke condition of anonymity.

"The detaining power's health personnel are the first and often the last line of defense against human rights abuses. Their failure to assume that role emphasizes to the prisoner how utterly beyond humane appeal they are," Miles said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press.
Alternately, how isolated and uncommon abuse really was.
He said military medicine reform needs to be enshrined in international law and include more clout for military medical staff in the defense of human rights.
He should be in charge, of course.
Miles gathered evidence from U.S. congressional hearings, sworn statements of detainees and soldiers, medical journal accounts and press reports to build a picture of physician complicity, and in isolated cases active participation by medical personnel in abuse at the Baghdad prison, as well as in Afghanistan and at the Guantanamo Bay detention center in Cuba.

In one example, cited in a sworn statement from an Abu Ghraib detainee, a prisoner collapsed and was apparently unconscious after a beating. Medical staff revived the detainee and left, allowing the abuse to continue, Miles reported. Depositions from two detainees at Abu Ghraib described an incident in which a doctor allowed a medically untrained guard to sew up a prisoner's wound.
And we all know how reliable the detainees are.
A military police officer reported a medic inserted an intravenous tube into the corpse of a detainee who died while being tortured to create evidence that he was alive at the hospital, Miles said.

At prisons in both Iraq and Afghanistan, "Physicians routinely attributed detainee deaths on death certificates to heart attacks, heat stroke or natural causes without noting the unnatural (cause) of the death," Miles wrote. He cites an example from a Human Rights Watch report in which soldiers tied a beaten detainee to the top of his cell door and gagged him. The death certificate indicated he died of "natural causes ... during his sleep." However, after media coverage, the Pentagon changed the cause of death to homicide by blunt force injuries and suffocation.

Dr. Robert Jay Lifton, a psychiatrist at Harvard University-affiliated Cambridge Hospital who wrote a book on doctors and torture in Nazi Germany, called the Lancet analysis "a very good, detailed description of violations of medical policies involving medical ethics."
Ah yes, the implicit Nazi angle surfaces.
In a July 29 New England Journal of Medicine essay, Lifton urged medics to report what they know about American torture at Abu Ghraib and other prisons, and said in an interview Thursday that a non-military-led investigation of doctors' conduct is needed. "They made choices," he said. "No doctor would have been physically abused or put to death if he or she tried to interrupt that torture. It would have taken courage, but it was a choice they had."

In an editorial comment, The Lancet condemned the behavior of the doctors, saying that despite dual loyalties, they are doctors first and soldiers second. "Health care workers should now break their silence," the journal said. "Those who were involved or witnessed ill-treatment need to give a full and accurate account of events at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. Those who are still in positions where dual commitments prevent them from putting the rights of their patients above other interests should protest loudly and refuse cooperation with authorities."

Johnson, the Army spokesman, said the U.S. military "will allow no actions that undermine or compromise medical professionals' commitment to caring for the sick and wounded, regardless of who they are or their circumstances."
Knowing a few military docs and nurses, I have no doubt that they would report abuse immediately. I think this is a bunch of grandstanding done with facts dug up by the Army itself.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  Elastic - why does it hate us?
Posted by: .com   2004-08-20 10:52:55 PM  

#3  If what this yahoo alleges is correct, shouldn't there be a fresh mass grave near Abu Ghraib full of dead folks with IV marks on their arms? Could the IV have been inserted because the trauma crew was trying to revive somebody? Isn't that SOP in a hospital until a doctor pronounces that a person has died? I'm not sure that the army doctors would have been able to detect waistband marks around the forehead of abused prisoners. I imagine that torture marks could have been easier to detect when the Baathists ran the show. But I don't know that I can fault Sadaam's doctors for failing to report burns caused by high voltage shocks. Especially since the Iraqi physicians were more likely see the prisoners for the purpose of amputating their hands rather than healing their burns.
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-08-20 10:51:20 PM  

#2  I heard about this idiot. He bases his conclusion on questionable sources at best. He is on a fishing expedition and wants something to put in the paper for the next two months. They are trying connect the ‘Bush-to-Hitler’ dots by any means necessary.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2004-08-20 3:12:28 PM  

#1  Hmmmm, a 'bioethicist' makes these charges? Where's the salt lick?
Posted by: Raj   2004-08-20 1:51:14 PM  

00:00