You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
'Suffering' Prisoner Seeks Bail to Have Sex
2004-08-24
An Indian man charged over the train torching that triggered Gujarat's Hindu-Muslim bloodshed two years ago has asked for bail so he can go home to have sex with his wife, court officials said on Tuesday.
"I mean, like, it's all swollen, y'know?"
Firozkhan Zafarkhan's two-page handwritten application to the court in the state's main city, Ahmedabad, says he and his wife are suffering mental trauma because their physical needs have not been met for such a long time. He wants to be allowed out of jail for 30 days. Zafarkhan, a Muslim, said his religion and India's conservative culture forbid him from having sex with anyone but his wife. He is charged under a tough anti-terrorism law with being part of a mob that torched a train in the Gujarat city of Godhra in February 2001, burning alive 59 Hindu pilgrims, including many women and children. That incident triggered days of communal violence, India's worst in a decade, in which human rights groups say more than 2,000 people, mainly Muslims, were burned and hacked to death. The anti-terrorism law makes bail almost impossible, but astonished prosecutors have not yet decided what to do. "It's an unprecedented bail application," said one, Sudhir Brahmbhatt." We have not decided whether to oppose this or not."
It's never come up before. They're not sure how to handle it.
Posted by:Chuck Simmins

#10  he is can get sex in prison. just not in him wife. they are shuld just tell him "you wife is been taken care of we are assure you".
Posted by: muck4doo   2004-08-24 8:31:07 PM  

#9  What a wimp. Time to send the weather balloons out for his ass.
Posted by: 6   2004-08-24 5:55:27 PM  

#8  Zafarkhan, a Muslim, said his religion and India’s conservative culture forbid him from having sex with anyone but his wife.
[my emph]

It's always someone else's fault, isn't it?

But, wait, does his explanation mean that his guards offered him sex with someone else?

And 30 days to meet his physical needs? My, my, what a stud.

How it felt for 59 people being burnt alive is apparently inconsequential compared to the "mental trauma" of Mr. Zafarkhan not having physical needs met.
Posted by: jules 187   2004-08-24 5:33:48 PM  

#7  This is what you get when self-abuse is frowned upon;)
Posted by: Spot   2004-08-24 2:48:08 PM  

#6  Maybe just a heck-hole, Frank.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2004-08-24 2:20:52 PM  

#5  The prisoner really blew it on this one. *ahem ahem*. If he used some buzzwords, like Humiliation™ in his brief, he would be chasing around the Old Lady as we speak.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-08-24 2:20:40 PM  

#4  *ahem*
I don't want the prison to be a hell-hole?
Posted by: Frank G   2004-08-24 2:18:10 PM  

#3  I think the prosecutors should tell him he should go F_ck himself...that will solve the problem neatly.

C'mon, if they let him out for this they are whacked in the head. You don't want the prison to be a hell-hole, but this crosses the border into "coddling" by several leages.
Posted by: Trub   2004-08-24 2:14:35 PM  

#2  ROFLMAO!
Posted by: Frank G   2004-08-24 2:13:57 PM  

#1  Here's an idea. Why don't you set your dick on fire?
Posted by: tu3031   2004-08-24 2:10:52 PM  

00:00