You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Brace Yourself
2004-09-04
Just an excerpt. Read it all...
Almost every day, al Qaeda suspects or affiliated terrorists are arrested somewhere in the world. Islamic fascists blow up Israelis, behead Nepalese, murder Russians children in schools and on the street, and kidnap French journalists (so much for appeasement). They want to destroy trains in New York as they did in Madrid. They seek to ruin democracy in Kabul and Baghdad and take down Russian airliners. Nearly each week they are caught forming cells in Europe and the United States — all akin in their desire for theocracy, incoherent demands, partiality for barbarous methods of killing civilians, and hatred of Western-style liberalism and freedom.

Now we learn that they may well turn their attention to targeted assassinations here at home — in the manner in which Osama bin Laden took out General Massoud of the Northern Alliance on the eve of the September 11 attacks, and like the various efforts to incinerate General Musharraf in Pakistan. The problem is not only that such efforts would be aimed at short-circuiting the nerve center of the United States, but also that previous reckless talk on the part of some cultural elites at home would only accentuate the turmoil.

The 2002 winner of the National Book Critics Circle Award, Nicholson Baker, is due out with Checkpoint — an extended dialogue on killing (in a variety of strange ways) George Bush. Last year, comedian Rick Hall played to full houses in the U.K., performing his newest composition, "Let's Get Together and Kill George Bush." A so-called pacifist group announced its sponsorship of a rather violent-sounding off-Broadway "guerilla comedy" entitled, I'm Gonna Kill the President.

This is stupid — and dangerous. Al Qaeda has announced its intentions play on perceptions of Western decadence and nihilism. Should the terrorists strike at our leaders, there will be a national accounting over the failure of those on the left to condemn such extremism. Alfred A. Knopf, for example, is promoting Baker's book as a cris du coeur — "in response to the powerless seething fury many Americans felt when President Bush decided to take the nation to war."

"Seething"? The radical Left is courting disaster and threatens to destroy the credibility of liberals who are apparently fearful of condemning the madness in their midst — this "cry of the heart" to save Saddam Hussein from the wrath of an imperialistic and bullying United States. When upscale protestors swear at delegates and parade obscene signs in New York while John Kerry goes windsurfing in shades and racing gloves, you have a recipe for disaster for wannabe populists.
Posted by:tipper

#14  Crikey: I fully expect nationwide Rodney King style rioting after Bush wins. The closer the election, the more idiots in the street.

Relax. Liberals just aren't mentally equipped to riot. Too darned dangerous. It also takes time away from quaffing lattes, going to art movies and making love.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-09-04 5:51:17 PM  

#13  Mike---I am going to print out a copy of your comment and file it in my drawer at work. Then we'll watch through heavy lenses and compare notes in October.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-09-04 5:47:17 PM  

#12  ..Let me tell you guys what I see coming.

Around the beginning of October, a group nobody's ever heard of is going to present 'proof' of a massive Republican plot to steal the election. The media will run with it and they'll hammer at it until we'll have a replay of last time, with the same result. Only this time, you will see at least two former presidents and a bunch of LLL leaders stand up and say for the good of the country, GWB must hand over the presidency to Kerry - and that is when the marches and riots will start...

I was happy to see those poll numbers today - but then I realized what it means for the Dhimmicrats. If they lose this time, and by the kind of margins those polls indicate, they are DOOMED.

And they'll pull the temple down around them before they let that happen.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2004-09-04 5:41:23 PM  

#11  Pork-based lubes for all weapons!
Posted by: Brett_the_Quarkian   2004-09-04 5:06:03 PM  

#10  #2 Is 60 rounds enough?
Hrmm......I was going to scoff but after checking my own ammo supply, clearly I don't have enough. I have more than sixty, but only for 1 gun and less than 30 for 1 pistol. Time to restock.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2004-09-04 4:55:40 PM  

#9  First... America's two parties are different from any others on the planet. They are not parties born of ideology rather parites born of evolution, grouping and compromise.

So...
If you where to look at parties as people (in a parent, adult, child sense) what would you see?

Republican: The core Republicans are actualized and know whom they are and what they believe. Self awareness is possible.

Democrats: The Democrats are a conglomeration of special interests that by definition can not achieve self actualization. Self awareness is not possible without a system crash.

This situation makes:
Republicans look more like adults
Democrats look more like spoiled children.


Neither of them are like modern parties elsewhere. The political agenda evolves and has no real relationship with pros and cons of issues.

I think Reagan was able to use the "adult-ness" or maturity of the Republican Image to attract the Religious Right and Southern Democrats to the Republican party. He took advantage of a patriarchal father image fit these folk prefered so he and they can say "because I told you so" in a Parent to Child mode.

This constrasted well with the disordered childlike democratic image seen by the pre-Reagan Moral Majority and Southern Dems as existing in a Democratic Party environment right out of "Lord of the Flys".
Posted by: 3dc   2004-09-04 4:00:29 PM  

#8  Now we learn that they may well turn their attention to targeted assassinations here at home

Which is essentially what the briefing I got this week covered. Nothing on whether there would be intentional/unintentional coordination by 'domestics'.
Posted by: Pappy   2004-09-04 3:26:57 PM  

#7  "while John Kerry goes windsurfing in shades and racing gloves" I've been windsurfing for more than 20 years. It is Kerry's only redeeming feature (of course some of the dumbest people I have ever met are windsurfers...duuuuuude). But the gloves and shades combo says he is a dork. Only a dork would wear that combo.

I live in Marin County, CA. I have a GWB sticker on my car. Someone asked me this morning if it had ever been vandalized. I'll bet it will be when George wins!
Posted by: Remote Man   2004-09-04 1:54:34 PM  

#6  I fully expect nationwide Rodney King style rioting after Bush wins. The closer the election, the more idiots in the street. I just pray he "steals" this election in a surprise landslide.
Posted by: Crikey   2004-09-04 1:53:02 PM  

#5  For many of us lifelong Democrats, the very sight of Michael Moore perched next to Jimmy Carter at the convention in Boston says it all — the sorry coming together of conspiratorial anti-Americanism and self-righteous appeasement.

Having been a lifelong Republican, except for the brain-fart I had in 1992 voting for Perot, I can't imagine what it must be like for sincere, and decent Dems like Mr. Hansen, and Sen. Miller.
Posted by: BigEd   2004-09-04 11:18:27 AM  

#4  "We will likely look back on this moment as the last time things made much sense - until we've cleared the decks and forced the rats overboard. It really will get crazy. It will probably be bloody, too."

I took a stroll through the DU boards last night, very disturbing. Lots of unhinged people talking about taking the "next step", "decisive action", "buy guns" etc. etc.

The projection going on was interesting as well. They believe that the media is biased towards the right and lots of other over the top things. Basically they feel that the "Right" is guilty of all the things they've been doing.

And they are INDIGNANT in the extreme. Lock and load. Watch your six RBer's.

CiT
Posted by: CiT   2004-09-04 9:01:04 AM  

#3  bad - Enough for what? Prolly depends on where you live, lol! In flyover country, that should do. In Boston, for example, you'll need quite a bit more, I'd guess, heh. Lotsa frags, body armor, and a reliable water supply would be good.
Posted by: .com   2004-09-04 7:31:19 AM  

#2  Is 60 rounds enough?
Posted by: badanov   2004-09-04 7:25:16 AM  

#1  Lol! VDH certainly "gets it" - and it will be a hairy ride ahead. I guess the only real question will be one of degree: How bad will the meltdown get?

For the very first time since this election season got cranked up, I feel like there are enough non-morons to defeat the forces of darkness in November. But that will only be the beginning, not the end.

We will likely look back on this moment as the last time things made much sense - until we've cleared the decks and forced the rats overboard. It really will get crazy. It will probably be bloody, too.
Posted by: .com   2004-09-04 6:27:30 AM  

00:00