You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Suspect Is Freed From Guantanamo
2004-09-09
A longtime captive at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, will be sent home to his native country after a military tribunal there determined that he is not an enemy combatant, Navy Secretary Gordon R. England announced yesterday. The decision ends nearly three years of incarceration for the man, who was picked up on the battlefields of Afghanistan.

England declined to provide details of the detainee's case, including his name and nationality, referring to an agreement with foreign countries not to release such information until a transfer home is completed. Pentagon officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the detainee, who is not an Afghan national, was captured in January 2002 and held in a detention facility in Afghanistan for a few months before he was transferred to Cuba, where he has been incarcerated ever since.

Human rights advocates sharply criticized the government for the length of the detainee's incarceration. "It should not take more than two years for the U.S. military to determine that we were holding someone who is apparently not an enemy combatant," American Civil Liberties Union executive director Anthony Romero said in a statement yesterday. "While this announcement is welcome, hundreds of so-called enemy combatants still languish in legal limbo at Guantanamo Bay. The government's assertion that it is entitled to lock people up indefinitely without any access to the courts violates our most basic notions of fundamental fairness."
Allowing terrorists to kill innocents also is fundamentally unfair.
It's all so unfair. Let's just give the guy a ticker-tape parade and a new Amana refrigerator already.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  Guantanamo Abuse story in 5...4...3...
Posted by: tu3031   2004-09-09 9:46:48 PM  

#4  Why are we "detaining" these people? If they are found on a battlefield, and have been observed to be firing at U.S. forces, kill them.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-09-09 1:22:24 PM  

#3  Pentagon officials have worried that releasing detainees without thorough review could prove deadly to U.S. forces in the future, noting that former detainees have been seen back in combat.

If we knew how many had been seen again, and what their initial affiliation was, we might be able to use that to help estimate the total trained fighter pool size. There'd be some sampling bias in the estimate, since former detainees will have to show their good faith by volunteering to be "on the front lines" again. OldSpook?

Posted by: James   2004-09-09 10:50:41 AM  

#2  I keep thinking about the prison uprising in Mazar-e-Sharrif that killed Spahn. Our humanity held us back. We should have levelled the place and eliminated these vermin. They WILL come back to harm us. They are just wired that way. I hope that these lessons are applied to future rat's nests. I would like to see this done in Fallujah. There is NO rehabilitation with these guys.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-09-09 10:10:25 AM  

#1  Another demonstration of how military tribunals are not Kangaroo courts.
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-09-09 4:24:41 AM  

00:00