You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
You'll know what to do
2004-09-13
And so it begins...
The CBS/Viacom-Kerry campaign smear of Bush using obviously fraudulent documents puts CBS/Viacom in violation of federal election laws.

We are filing an emergency appeal to the Federal Election Commission urging immediate action to hold CBS/Viacom in violation of federal election law.
Posted by:OldSpook

#13  Is Mrs. D a woman, or is she just an appendage.
Posted by: feeling bitchy   2004-09-13 5:18:52 PM  

#12  Marcel is a male. Or did he have the operation?
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-09-13 5:17:14 PM  

#11  So what exactly did Marcel B. Matley review when she determined the Vince Foster suicide note to be legit? Was it actually the note, or were other docs involved?

Posted by: feeling bitchy   2004-09-13 5:05:51 PM  

#10  "Marcel B. Matley, (CBS' document examiner) "said he had only judged a May 4, 1972, memo"

Thta's what happens when you trust a guy named "Marcel".
Posted by: Anonymous6435   2004-09-13 5:03:54 PM  

#9  if we assembled together in a courtroom, the lawyer-bloggers currently "prosecuting" Dan Rather in the blogosphere could, collectively, match up just fine against any legal team CBS News

Ha! Ha! Now that's a new development in the war against the lamestream media. I'm guessing the blogosphere could raise the money and easily win this case, even if the bloggers all showed up in their pajamas!
Posted by: Anonymous6417   2004-09-13 12:04:00 PM  

#8  It is a big mistake to take issues such as this to court. This is a political moral issue and should be settled in the court of public opinion. This is why we have fre political speech. People should be able to say whatever they want in an election campaign. Even Dan Rather. But you don't have to believe it. Boycotts are a great way to vote outside the poling place, but don't abridge freedom of speech. It'll come back to haunt you because the Democrats are better at pulling the levers of big government than the rest of us.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-09-13 11:47:26 AM  

#7  OS -
The commission idea is excellent, and would give CBS a chance at something resembling a dignified retreat. The problem is that any commisison would have Walter Cronkite on it, most likely at its head...and he has been openly anti-Bush. Cronkite had no problems using his bully pulpit 40 years ago to stab the men in vietnam in the back, and I dont think he'd have any problem doing it again here to insire a Bush defeat.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2004-09-13 11:38:56 AM  

#6  Speaking of Beldar, last night he posted credentials of the lawyer-bloggers, including his own, that clearly show that CBS/Rather aren't dealing with moonbats.
Baldar finished with this remark: I'm highly confident that if we assembled together in a courtroom, the lawyer-bloggers currently "prosecuting" Dan Rather in the blogosphere could, collectively, match up just fine against any legal team CBS News chose to hire from any firm or firms anywhere in the country. And Dan — without being too self-righteous about it — we're kickin' your butt in the blogosphere, buddy. You guys can't even field a decent team in this arena.
Posted by: GK   2004-09-13 9:01:59 AM  

#5  NYTimes Column by Saffire - money quote (per Beldar)

"Hey, Dan: On this, recognize the preponderance of doubt. Call for a panel of old CBS hands and independent editors to re-examine sources and papers. Courage."

(For the more memory impaired amongst us, "Courage" is how Rather closed his newscasts for a while when he was afield - its a rather mocking thing for Safire to say).
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-09-13 2:25:59 AM  

#4  From NRO Kerry Corner:

September 27, 2002 issue of the journal, "The Practical Litigator":

Further, a definite finding of authenticity for a signature is not possible from a photocopy, while a definite finding of falsity is possible.

Author?

Marcel Matley. Of CBS 'Expert" fame.
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-09-13 2:22:46 AM  

#3  Doing a bit of aggregation here.

CBS' case is falling apart...

Interview in The Los Angeles Times (registration required)

Marcel B. Matley, (CBS' document examiner) "said he had only judged a May 4, 1972, memo — in which Killian ordered Bush to take his physical — to be authentic. He said he did not form a judgment on the three other disputed memos because they only included Killian's initials and he did not have validated samples of the officer's initials to use for comparison."
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-09-13 2:15:30 AM  

#2  From Michelle Malkin
I suggest asking CBS to immediately assemble an independent commission comprised of forgery experts. The commission should be given one week to determine whether it is more likely than not that the documents in question were forged. If CBS does not cooperate, a boycott against both CBS and its major advertisers should be organized.
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-09-13 2:12:49 AM  

#1  There are also rumblings of sites being built to boycott CBS News Advertizers, and hit them with a email and snail-mail written complaint campaign
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-09-13 2:09:52 AM  

00:00