You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Tech
Satellite Mishap Blamed on Human Error
2004-10-06
A $239 million satellite toppled to a factory floor last year because nobody bothered to check that it was secure before moving it, according to a NASA investigation board's report on the mishap. The NOAA N-Prime satellite fell about 3 feet as it was being moved from a vertical to a horizontal position on Sept. 6, 2003, to remove an instrument at a facility in Sunnyvale, Calif. Nobody noticed that the 24 bolts that should have secured the spacecraft were missing.
I've had days like this.
Investigators were especially critical of the Lockheed Martin operations team for its "lack of discipline in following procedures," a problem that evolved from "complacent attitudes toward routine spacecraft handling, poor communication and coordination." Buddy Nelson, a Lockheed Martin spokesman, said NASA's final report was consistent with the findings of the company's internal investigators. "Lockheed Martin has implemented improvements to company policies, procedures and practices that ensure such an incident will not occur again," he said Tuesday.
"Anybody see a set of bolts and a restraining strap 'round here?"
It will cost an estimated $135 million to rebuild the spacecraft's main section and two damaged instruments. No one was injured in the incident. On Monday, NOAA announced that it has reached an agreement with Lockheed Martin to finish the satellite. In addition, the company will contribute all profits it earned from the contract to rebuild the spacecraft and will complete the work on a cost-only basis, Nelson said. Before the accident, the spacecraft was supposed to be placed into storage until launch in 2008. It's now scheduled to be launched in December 2007.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Into orbit early makes sense; the booster can experience a 'guidance system failure' and then after the operational (?) satellite plunges back to Earth in a firey ball, LM can file for loss of income (or some such) because "...the gpv't cannot prove the repairs were unsuccessful..."
And eventually they will get paid.
Posted by: USN, retired   2004-10-06 6:46:21 PM  

#8  you should reade my monograf on the importance of girl friends and fuel addatives in high compression motorcyle engines

gin and and tarts of motorcyle maintenance
Posted by: half   2004-10-06 5:19:09 PM  

#7  Somebody watched the "fish store" video, perhaps?
"Hey Alan, toss that satellite over here."
"Here it comes!"
"Oops."

Here at Raytheon, the saying is: "If it were easy, Lockheed could do it." I guess moving satellites around is not easy.

If you read Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, you will understand the importance of a $0.05 nut in a $9000 motorcycle. Similarly, some people now understand the importance of $1.50 worth of bolts in a $239,000,000 satellite.

I find it interesting that after the accident, the satellite will now be launched earlier.
Posted by: jackal   2004-10-06 4:20:20 PM  

#6  My ex-girlfriend built microwave antennas for DirectTV satellites. Metal tubes are precisely positioned to distribute the signals to the horn array. One night an overzealous cleaning person decided that the “loose tubes on that equipment looked like a safety hazard” and duct taped the wave-guides to the satellite frame, ruining them in the process.
Posted by: Anonymous5032   2004-10-06 10:53:55 AM  

#5  "It will cost an estimated $135 million to rebuild the spacecraft's main section and two damaged instruments."

That's more than $5 million per bolt.
Posted by: Bryan   2004-10-06 10:06:10 AM  

#4  Tip for Lockheed Martin: Although designed for it, the satellite is not actually in a zero-gravity environment until it is launched.
Posted by: Dar   2004-10-06 9:44:45 AM  

#3  Ummmmmmmmmmm... sorry?
Posted by: tu3031   2004-10-06 9:14:07 AM  

#2  PBMcL,do you really want that guy preparing your food?
Posted by: GK   2004-10-06 1:50:01 AM  

#1  Somebody didn't follow the checklist. A new career in the food service industry awaits!
Posted by: PBMcL   2004-10-06 12:35:39 AM  

00:00