You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Security Council Adopts Russian Resolution On, Something
2004-10-08
The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously Friday to step up the global campaign against terrorism, calling on all nations to prosecute or extradite anyone supporting, financing or participating in terrorist acts. The 15-0 vote culminated weeks of negotiations by Russia, which introduced the resolution after militants staged a series of attacks there, including the suicide hijacking of two planes and the hostage-taking of a school in Beslan. It was adopted a day after several car bombings targeted Israelis at Egyptian resorts in Sinai.
Not that those bombing count as terrorism to the UN.
"We think these events stressed even more the urgency to take further practical steps in the fight against terrorism and we consider the U.N. is the best coordinator in this fight," Russia's deputy U.N. ambassador Alexander Konuzin said. The resolution creates a Security Council working group to study measures to be taken against terrorists and terrorist groups not affiliated with al-Qaida or Afghanistan's former Taliban rulers.
So it doesn't really do anything then.
They're just fixin' to get ready to talk about getting ready to have a meeting on whether to have talks...
The council already imposed stiff sanctions against those groups — requiring all 191 U.N. member states to impose a travel ban and arms embargo against a list of those linked to al-Qaida or the Taliban and to freeze their financial assets.
Yep. That's done it, by Gum!
But it has not examined what actions to take against other terrorists.
You expected something else?
Might I suggest lumping them all together and indiscriminantly killing them all?
"It is important that we have agreed in principle to consider measures against terrorists other than those linked to al-Qaida," said Algeria's U.N. Ambassador Abdallah Baali.
That statement alone shows why he's a UN diplomat.
Pakistan and Algeria, the only Muslim nations on the 15-member council, both expressed concern this week that language in the final draft of the resolution would make it a crime to fight in a liberation war and that a new list of terrorist subjects would be compiled.
Afraid your oxen are going to be gored?
"List? We don't need no stinking list!"
During final negotiations that continued into Friday morning, the text was changed to make clear that the resolution targeted only criminal acts defined in international conventions dealing with terrorism. The reference to a possible terrorist list as one measure the working group would consider was dropped at the last minute.
Of course, they still can't decide on a definition of what consitutes a terrorist.
Posted by:Steve

#9  So! Where for lunch?
Posted by: Shipman   2004-10-08 5:13:30 PM  

#8  Mmmmmm! Let's see. Oil for food. Members are thinking how can we make some money out of this one.
Posted by: John (Q. Citizen)   2004-10-08 4:53:37 PM  

#7  wonderful words.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-10-08 4:46:46 PM  

#6  for example
"Resolution 843 (1993)

The Security Council,

Recalling its resolution 724 (1991) concerning Yugoslavia and all other relevant resolutions,

Recalling also Article 50 of Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,

Conscious of the fact that an increasing number of requests for assistance have been received under the provisions of Article 50 of the Charter of the United Nations,

Noting that the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 724 (1991), at its 65th meeting, set up a working group to examine the above-mentioned requests,

Confirms that the Committee established pursuant to resolution 724 (1991) is entrusted with the task of examining requests for assistance under the provisions of Article 50 of the Charter of the United Nations;

Welcomes the establishment by the Committee of its working group and invites the Committee, as it completes the examination of each request, to make recommendations to the President of the Security Council for appropriate action.

Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-08 4:31:45 PM  

#5  i think working groups are actually pretty routine at the UNSC. an ad hoc commitee to write the study, not a seperate implenatation body. The implementation will still be by UNSC resolution, as with the previous one to extradite AQ and Taliban.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-08 4:25:14 PM  

#4  Agree with LH. Note the implication of this:

The resolution creates a Security Council working group to study measures to be taken against terrorists and terrorist groups not affiliated with al-Qaida or Afghanistan's former Taliban rulers

Implies:

1) the Russians recognize that the UNSC structure is inadequate and therefore needs to be supplanted by a "working group" that presumably comprises serious nations that actually can and will project power against terrorists; and

2) terror is depoliticized. It's not a specific threat to America or Israel but a global threat to all civilized nations.

This could pave the way for a successor security group that would bypass the UNSC. Perhaps it could include the UNSC 5 plus serious and capable powers such as Japan, Germany, Australia, India, South Korea, maybe Indonesia and Turkey.
Posted by: lex   2004-10-08 3:45:15 PM  

#3  im more positive on this - Russia joined with the US, France, Germany, UK, Romania, to insist on addressing the issue of non-AQ terrorists. They wanted to go further now, IIUC, but Pakistan and Algeria objected. Neither of the latter has a veto, and ultimately something should go through - frustrated that theyre gonna do a "study" first - yeah, but thats reality on the East River.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-08 3:37:00 PM  

#2  When crafting that definition don't forget to include an exception for those that target the Jeewwwwwsss! Otherwise the Islamic nations will never pass the definition.

I know colonialism is bad and all but you ever wonder what it would have been like if the Europeans would have held on long enough to imprint traces of civilization into the Middle East?
Posted by: RJ Schwarz   2004-10-08 2:41:49 PM  

#1  mmmmmmmmmmmm, something.
/Homer Simpson
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2004-10-08 1:07:47 PM  

00:00