You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Iraq denies explosives disappeared before war
2004-10-27
A top Iraqi science official says it is impossible that 350 tonnes of high explosives could have been smuggled out of a military site south of Baghdad before the regime fell last year.
Well, if they were moved by Saddam's regime before it fell, it wouldn't be smuggling now, would it?
The UN nuclear watchdog this week said the explosives went missing from a weapons dump some time after Saddam Hussein's regime was toppled in April 2003.
Not that they were anywhere near Iraq at the time.
But as the issue of the missing explosives took centre stage in the US presidential campaign, some US officials have suggested they had gone before the US-led forces moved on Baghdad.
"It is impossible that these materials could have been taken from this site before the regime's fall," Mohammed al-Sharaa, who heads the Science Ministry's site monitoring department, said. "The officials that were inside this facility (Al-Qaqaa) beforehand confirm that not even a shred of paper left it before the fall. "I spoke to them about it and they even issued certified statements to this effect which the US-led coalition was aware of."
NOTE: "The officials that were inside this facility beforehand" Which means they were part of Saddam's regime, as I expect Mohammed al-Sharaa was as well. Of course, they don't have any reason to lie. Right?
Mr Sharaa also warns that other nearby sites with similar materials could have also been plundered. -- AFP
Posted by:Steve

#4  Who's side is Mohammed Al-Sharaa on?

France? Kerry? El Baradei? Saddam?
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2004-10-27 7:37:18 PM  

#3  It would take 40 dump trucks--possibly more than that depending on the capacity of Iraqi trucks-- but how many white Toyota pick-up trucks would it take?
Posted by: eLarson   2004-10-27 5:14:35 PM  

#2  How hard is it to prove they were or werent there anyways? Are we gonna hear a solid rebuke of these accusations besides Cheneys remarks that say He is not sure that the 380 tons was even there when the US arrived? Ok back to the video....http://www.dailyrecycler.com/blog/2004/10/nytrogate.html
Posted by: Johnnie Bartlette   2004-10-27 10:45:56 AM  

#1  Lets see...380 tons. Hmm. That would take a hundred men and 40 dump trucks, 10, 12hr days to move right in front of the US military.
Anyhew, didnt we already see NBC's 2003 video yesterday?
Posted by: Johnnie Bartlette   2004-10-27 10:38:38 AM  

00:00