You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Cronkite sees Rovian plot behind OBL Tape
2004-10-30
EFL
LARRY KING, HOST: Tonight, four days before America votes in the first election since 9/11, a new Osama bin Laden tape addressing the American people and naming both President Bush and John Kerry. How will this affect the race? We'll ask a living legend of broadcast journalism, Walter Cronkite, the former CBS News anchor. ...
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

OSAMA BIN LADEN (through translator): Your security is not in the hands of Kerry or Bush or al Qaeda. Your security is in your own hands. Any nation that does not attack us will not be attacked.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KING: OK, Walter. What do you make of this?

CRONKITE: Well, I make it out to be initially the reaction that it's a threat to us, that unless we make peace with him, in a sense, we can expect further attacks. He did not say that precisely, but it sounds like that when he says...

KING: The warning.

CRONKITE: What we just heard. So now the question is basically right now, how will this affect the election? And I have a feeling that it could tilt the election a bit. In fact, I'm a little inclined to think that Karl Rove, the political manager at the White House, who is a very clever man, he probably set up bin Laden to this thing. The advantage to the Republican side is to get rid of, as a principal subject of the campaigns right now, get rid of the whole problem of the al Qaqaa explosive dump. Right now, that, the last couple of days, has, I think, upset the Republican campaign.

KING: Are there enough undecideds to tilt this? Or what do you think of the whole election picture?

CRONKITE: Well, I think it's one of the biggest messes we've had in a long time. I believe that we're undoubtedly not going to know the results of this election. I don't want to knock you off the air on Monday night or anything, or Tuesday night. But I suspect that we're not going to know who the next president is, whether it is Bush or the new man, until very probably sometime in the early spring. There's so much controversy that they're planting, deliberately planting at the polls, that there's almost certainly to be a suit going back to the Supreme Court eventually, going through the other courts slowly first.

KING: Who's to blame for this?

CRONKITE: Who's to blame for it really is the intensity of this campaign. Plus the fact that we have a preface to this in the last campaign. What year was that now?

KING: 2000.

CRONKITE: 2000. Thank you very much.
Right on top of events.
We saw that we could go to court. We saw that with watchers on both sides, heavily mounted police to watch from both sides the polling in many states, nearly all of the heavy states. And in those cases, they will be finding every possible reason to file against the results.
...
KING: We're back with Walter Cronkite. Why has this campaign -- and you've been through a lot of them -- been so vituperative?

CRONKITE: I think partly because of the nature of the administration.
It's all Bush's fault
It has offended a large number of people quite seriously, right down to their souls, apparently.
That may of them deny having
The war has not supported fully, certainly by all the people.
Quagmire! Let's have a Viet Nam Redo
The economy has touched a lot of our people. And they feel very strongly about it. So there is a very definite body there in opposition to the administration, as we know. And the administration itself has a lot of support. I think that mostly it's really locked into the Iraqi situation.
I used to think a lot of him, but these comments and others he has spouted over the last few years make me wonder what Uncle Walter's real motivations were in 1968.
Posted by:Mrs. Davis

#14  This is sad... you know, he used to be a respected journalist. Shouldn't there be someone with a shepherd's crook, hanging about in the wings, to haul these goofs offstage when they begin to disgrace themselves and their profession?
Posted by: Sgt. Mom   2004-10-30 11:15:28 PM  

#13  Seafarious!

You stole my line! Been out with the woman and the youngin' since early afternoon...

Dang I missed this posting, though I heard about Walter Walrus' blubbering earlier!

WALTER! YOU FORGOT YOUR PAXIL!
Posted by: BigEd   2004-10-30 11:09:42 PM  

#12  maybe Jimmy Castro Carter and Walter Crankcase can go hold hands in the back of the theater at the next Michael Mooron lie filled POS C movie "documentary"?
Posted by: anymouse   2004-10-30 8:03:16 PM  

#11  Plus the fact that we have a preface to this in the last campaign. What year was that now?

KING: 2000.

CRONKITE: 2000. Thank you very much.


Do you think he really needs to draw a clock?
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-10-30 6:01:29 PM  

#10  Karl Rove set up Binny....haaahahahahahahaaaahaaa.....someone ask Cronkite to draw a clock on a piece of paper, just to see if he's in the beginning stages of developing Alzheimer's.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-10-30 5:17:59 PM  

#9  Was he wearing a bib for the drool?
Posted by: Seafarious   2004-10-30 5:02:00 PM  

#8  It should be Walter Krankheit, which means sickness in German.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-10-30 4:57:56 PM  

#7  Maybe he could share a double with his buddy, Yassir.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-10-30 4:54:30 PM  

#6  Arafat isn't the only one exhibiting signs of dementia. Time to move WC to an assisted living facility.
Posted by: RWV   2004-10-30 4:48:50 PM  

#5  the only soul they had they had has already sold, to the first cow-headed pinko commie socialist fascist anything but Bush. The 3/4 of real Americans left in this country can still win the war for the rest of the world, incuding the anti-american amerikan sheeple.
Posted by: Mac Suirtain   2004-10-30 2:06:57 PM  

#4  "And to think we as a nation trusted this fellow who just PROVED that MSM has been baised all along. Cronkheit is a proven CRANK now."

As far as I'm concerned, Cronkhite was proven a crank a long, LONG time ago. I'm 55 years old, and when I last trusted "Uncle Walter" I was measuring my age in single digits. I had him pegged as a pompous, self-important blowhard back in the early 60's, and by 1968 a TREASONOUS, pompous, self-important blowhard.

Dan Rather's dishonesty is just a minor extrapolation from Cronkhite's.
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-10-30 1:55:18 PM  

#3  Up until now, I have almost always voted Democrat. My boyfriend, therefore, thinks my current fixation on liberal nuttiness is a bit weird. I read him this bit from the Cronkite interview:

It seemed almost, to me, that [Bin Laden] wanted to enter into negotiations, that he was really up -- he wants to move into a leadership role in international affairs instead of the role of a brigand.

His reaction: That's nuts. I told him, they're all nuts. The Democrats [and their media and academic pals] have gone completely nuts. That's what I've been flippin' on about all these months.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2004-10-30 1:43:52 PM  

#2  And to think we as a nation trusted this fellow who just PROVED that MSM has been baised all along.

Cronkheit is a proven CRANK now.

NOW we know why he spoke out against the Vietnam war - by pretending to be unbiased and objective, his viewpoints carried a lot of weight - which he abused.

Cronkheit may you rot in hell for the souls you caused to die in Camobdia and Vietnam with your traitorous acts.
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-10-30 1:25:32 PM  

#1  The MSM (and that includes Larry King) let the leftist clowns get away with the most outrageous stuff imaginable.

If a Republican had said the same thing about McAwful & sKerry, King would have been all over him. Instead he let Crankcase's egregious LIE slide - meaning he agrees with it.

Not being Christian, I don't believe in Hell, but I've changed my mind - I do think there's a special Hell reserved just for these wankers.

May they burn for all eternity - or better yet, may they be completely without any power whatsoever for all eternity, which would probably be more painful for them.

@$!#%*&#!
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-10-30 12:29:07 PM  

00:00