You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
ElBaradei optimistic on Iranian nuclear agreement
2004-11-08
The United Nation's nuclear watchdog chief said on Monday he was cautiously optimistic over a tentative deal between Iran and the European Union's three big powers regarding Tehran's disputed nuclear program. Mohamed ElBaradei, chief of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said he still had to confirm details of the agreement, but hoped it included the suspension of uranium enrichment programs in Iran as a sign of good faith by Tehran. "I am told it is still a very tentative agreement, it has still not yet been confirmed," ElBaradei told a news conference in Sydney. "I would hope that this would lead to the desired outcome, which is Iran to suspend processing and enrichment activities and open the way for the normalization of Iran's relations with the international community. What the international community is asking Iran, that at least for now, (is) suspend enrichment activities as a confidence building measure. We are cautiously optimistic we are moving in that direction."
Yeah. Right. Build my confidence.
Iranian and EU officials said on Sunday a deal had been struck between Iran, Britain, Germany and France after two days of talks in Paris that could see Tehran avert U.N. Security Council sanctions over its disputed nuclear program. Under the deal Iran would freeze all nuclear fuel enrichment and reprocessing activities until it has reached a final agreement with the EU over a package of economic, technological and security incentives in return for abandoning potentially weapons-related nuclear activities, the diplomats said. The deal now awaits the go-ahead from Iran's clerical leadership, EU diplomatic sources told Reuters.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#8   Grom,
For that matter, The DNC would be a better organization than the UNSC. Even if only marginally. Heck, NOW couldn't be any worse than the UNSC.
Posted by: Mike   2004-11-08 4:08:11 PM  

#7   This loathesome rat Mohamed ElBaradei works hand in glove with the Iranians to delay, delay, delay. One can only imgaine his offshore accounts. It might have a been a "plomo o oro" kind of deal.
Posted by: dennisw   2004-11-08 12:39:33 PM  

#6  I think that we will go the UNSC route for window dressing. Powell/Rumsfelt good cop/bad cop show. The real plans and options are already underway. Time is already running short on Bushehr and the U235 concentration sites, as they are already up or soon will be. The MMs are playing a giant game of chicken. It is up to the US and Israel to protect the world from the MM's madness. The EU as EUsual, picks the appeasement option.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-11-08 11:03:40 AM  

#5  trailing wife
"a way to forestall Bush bringing the whole thing irreversibly before the UNSC"

Wouldn't USAF be a more proper organization to deal with the issue?
Posted by: gromgorru   2004-11-08 10:18:52 AM  

#4  Sideshow. Real show will come when Israel puts into action some of those 500 bunker-busters they bought from us.
Posted by: lex   2004-11-08 10:12:23 AM  

#3  a sucker's game - regime change is the only answer (along with a decapitating strike/destruction of their facilities)
Posted by: Frank G   2004-11-08 10:10:22 AM  

#2  I'm not sure I agree, Toluison. The Mullahs, like the Norks, have made -- and not kept -- promises before. I see this more as a way to forestall Bush bringing the whole thing irreversibly before the UNSC.
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-11-08 10:01:16 AM  

#1  bush wins--the turbans fold-cause-effect--mullahs move from uranium enrichment back to self enrichment as e.u. bribes go to building even bigger mansions in qum
Posted by: SON OF TOLUI   2004-11-08 5:37:24 AM  

00:00