You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran reneges on nuclear agreement with Euros
2004-11-12
A deal committing Iran to suspend activities that Washington says are part of a nuclear arms program was close to collapse Friday, with diplomats suggesting that Tehran had reneged on an agreement reached with European negotiators just days ago. As envoys for both sides tried to salvage the deal, the International Atomic Energy Agency delayed a report on Iran's nuclear activities that had been scheduled for limited circulation Friday. A diplomat familiar with the IAEA said the delay was meant to give the two sides a chance to resolve the dispute and allow agency head Mohamed ElBaradei to include in his report an Iranian commitment to full suspension of uranium enrichment and related activities.

The IAEA overview on nearly two decades of clandestine activities that the United States asserts is a secret weapons program is being prepared for review by the agency's 35-nation board of governors when it meets Nov. 25. Based on the report, they will decide on possible referral of Iran to the U.N. Security Council, which could call for sanctions. After ending talks in Paris with Iranian envoys last weekend, European diplomats said there was tentative agreement on the part of Tehran to suspend uranium enrichment - which can be used to make nuclear arms - and all related activities. The deal leaves open the exact length of the suspension but says it will be in effect at least as long as it takes for the two sides to negotiate a deal on European technical and financial aid, including help in the development of Iranian nuclear energy for power generation.

But on Friday the diplomats told The Associated Press that Iranian officials had presented British, French and German envoys in Tehran with a version of the agreement that was unacceptable to the three European powers. The key dispute was over conversion of uranium into gas, which when spun in centrifuges can be enriched to lower levels for producing electricity or processed into high-level, weapons-grade uranium, said the diplomats, speaking on condition of anonymity. "The processing of what is to be enriched is the main problem," said the diplomat.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#7  IOW, PC they're enticing Bush to attack their country, where US/Allied milfors will face nuclearized insurgents and potential anti-US foreign mil intervention,rather than send large numbers of loyal RVG to certain destruction vv anti-US combat in Iraq. PRAVDA, etal. >China is looking for oil and Russia's crude reserves will allegedly be history in circa "15 years", so the last thing they need is for over-successful America, GB, and the West to de facto control ME oil. MDB.RU author-commentator is proclaiming that China in 2004 is akin to Stalinist Russia of the 1930's, pre-WW2, where the main Commie Govt-Party is doing everything it can to quickly modernize, even at high, high, HIGH costs in lives, monies, and resources - if the author is correct, then China will need a major war where centralization is intensified/justified such that post-victory it will come out a de facto global superpower - Normandy-Pacific Victory, Lend Lease, post-War Marshall Plan, Korea 1 and Roswellian aliens, ...etc. notwithstanding!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2004-11-12 11:01:29 PM  

#6  This is news?
Posted by: lex   2004-11-12 8:08:40 PM  

#5  Iran reneges on nuclear agreement with Euros = Dog Bites Man
Posted by: lex   2004-11-12 8:08:13 PM  

#4  The day is getting near
and on that day the Mullas
are going to glow in the dark
Posted by: Elder of Zion   2004-11-12 4:34:59 PM  

#3  Actually, such a one-sided (for the mullahs) agreement would be their best defense against the US.
Posted by: someone   2004-11-12 3:25:12 PM  

#2  Gee, the suprise-o-meter didn't even budge on this one!
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2004-11-12 3:21:01 PM  

#1  That didn't take long. Guess they figured they'd made a bad bargain when Kerry didn't ask for a recount.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-11-12 2:43:04 PM  

00:00