You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Has "Tried" Arrested Al Qaeda Members
2004-12-06
Iran's judiciary has tried a number of arrested al Qaeda members and verdicts have been issued, a senior judiciary official was quoted as saying on Monday. Tehran Justice Department head Abbasali Alizadeh told the semi-official Fars news agency Iran's "high-ranking officials are satisfied with the issued verdicts," but did not elaborate on what the verdicts had been.
"Heros of the Islamic Revolution" comes to mind
News of the trials is likely to anger Washington, which has repeatedly called on Iran to hand over all al Qaeda suspects it is holding. Guilty verdicts sentencing them to long jail terms would make that an even more distant prospect.
Like there was any chance of them turning them over in the first place
Reuters could not immediately reach judiciary or government officials for comment. Western intelligence and Saudi sources believe Iran may have captured al Qaeda's security chief and a son of the group's leader Osama bin Laden. Iran has extradited scores of suspected al Qaeda militants who fled Afghanistan and Pakistan in the last three years. But it has rebuffed U.S. calls to hand them all over and last year announced plans to put around a dozen on trial. Hossein Mousavian, secretary of the foreign policy committee of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, said in June that the suspects were middle-ranking al Qaeda members. He said they had been: "plotting against the national security of Iran and they have planned for terrorist activities inside Iran."

The United States has long believed Iran was harboring al Qaeda militants who escaped Afghanistan after U.S. troops invaded in late 2001 after the September 11 attacks. It has said Iran-based al Qaeda militants plotted suicide bombings in Saudi Arabia and that Tehran gave safe passage to several of the 19 hijackers who carried out the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington. Iran acknowledges that al Qaeda members have managed to cross into Iran over its long and difficult-to-police borders with Afghanistan and Pakistan. But it denies providing safe-haven to al Qaeda members and says it deeply opposes the group's methods and philosophy. The most important figure that Western intelligence agencies say may be there is Saif al-Adel, an Egyptian. He is widely believed to have taken charge of al Qaeda operations after Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the September 11 attacks, was captured in Pakistan. Saudi sources said last year that Iran had also detained Saad bin Laden, a son of Osama, as well as al Qaeda spokesman Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, who is a Kuwaiti.
Detained or held as hostages? I could see them doing that.
Iran has refused to name the al Qaeda members it is holding. Alizadeh said the trials had been conducted by a "special judge" after taking into account information presented by security and intelligence officials.
Posted by:Steve

#9  I think there is a safe haven and who is the "special judge" a friend or relative
of the terror groups? It would not surprise me.

Bin Laden was a "friend" to the U.S. during Desert Storm ! I'm glad I am not over there.

Andrea
Posted by: andrea   2004-12-06 5:13:56 PM  

#8  And the sentence: fifty Mullah farts at 30 meters. Any questions?
Posted by: Capt America   2004-12-06 5:05:07 PM  

#7  It could have been worse... They could have been 'tried' by the 9th circus court.

Then we would be paying reparations for building those twin towers in the path of those jetliners.....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-12-06 5:03:14 PM  

#6  B the Q

Iranian MSM don't have informants who speak "on condition of anonymity", They are probably all dead.
Posted by: SwissTex   2004-12-06 4:53:23 PM  

#5  Notice NO specifics like a name? or the charges? or sentence? Or ANY information?
Posted by: Brett_the_Quarkian   2004-12-06 4:25:10 PM  

#4  They continue to be unhelpful... that is a known known.
Posted by: Don R. , Pentagon, DC   2004-12-06 3:41:12 PM  

#3  Was the "special" judge drooling on himself?
Posted by: mojo   2004-12-06 3:02:14 PM  

#2  Didn't try hard enough, eh?
Posted by: .com   2004-12-06 1:32:53 PM  

#1  First, they tried to give them money, but they wasted it doing stupid things. Then they tried to get them to go to Iraq and fight against the Americans, but they wouldn't follow suicide orders given by their handlers...
Posted by: Anonymoose   2004-12-06 1:23:08 PM  

00:00