You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Tranquility Bay: The last resort
2004-12-07
Some parents of rebellious teenagers in the US are turning to privately-owned correctional institutions to steer their wayward children back on the right path. But is this tough love tactic a step too far?
Probably not. But I'm sure Beebs thinks it is...
Perched on the edge of a cliff in Treasure Beach - a remote fishing village in southern Jamaica - there is a hand-painted sign on the wall: "Welcome to Tranquility Bay." This isolated boarding school is surrounded by security cameras, iron gates, barred windows and high concrete walls. It looks like a top security prison; but it is neither a prison, nor a juvenile detention centre. At a cost of between $25,000 (£13,000) and $40,000 (£20,800) a year, parents of unruly teenagers send their children here to learn how to behave.
That's a lot of scratch to invest in "going a step too far." Presumably, parents think they're getting something for their money.
Tranquility Bay is one of several facilities run by an American business organisation called WWASPS, the World Wide Association of Speciality Programs and Schools. According to their website, Tranquility Bay exists "to challenge and motivate the student in a structured, individualised learning environment... so they become mature, responsible and contributing members of society." The teenagers inside are typically enrolled on the programme for three years, but this varies and largely depends on when the institution, and their parents, think they are fit to graduate.
Three years is $75,000, by my calculations...
As I glanced around the institution, some pupils - mostly white Americans dressed in khaki shorts and shirts, and flip flops - walked past me in line, military-style, with vacant expressions. Not one of them looked at me, not even a peep from the corner of an eye.
Maybe they weren't interested?
Fifteen-year-old Shannon Levy's parents arranged for their daughter to be forcibly taken from their home and escorted to Tranquility Bay. "Three strangers - a lady and two big men - came into my house and sat me down on the sofa," Shannon told me. "They said I was going to Jamaica and they handcuffed me and said I could co-operate or they were going to throw me over their shoulder. I was screaming for my mom because I had no clue what was going on. I was very scared," she said.
Golly. Sounds very traumatic. I wonder what pushed her Mom to such desperate measures?
When I asked Shannon's mother Jayne why she felt the need to send her daughter to a school reputed for its harsh treatment of pupils, she simply said: "Desperate parents do desperate things." Shannon had disrespected her mother, was sleeping around, drinking alcohol, smoking pot and not doing well at school. Arguably, most of the children sent to the school flaunt typical teenage behaviour.
Arguably, most teenagers experiment with all or most of those things. Some take it to extremes of drooling stoopidity. When I experimented with disrespecting my mother at a young age the immediate result was a fat lip. When I experimented with warm beer out under the railroad bridge with my friends as a teenager, my Dad pointed out to me that gents can hold their liquor and I'd we well advised to learn my limits unless I liked puking. I never got into pot, but I knew enough people with psychological seams that opened up when they did get into it to make me want to stay away from it. Jayne sounds like she was one of those mothers who think children are little adults, rather than adults in training.
In order to recondition these children, once inside, they are completely cut off from their home life. They are not permitted to talk to their families until they conform to the programme - which is a reward and punishment system. If you do what you are told, when you are told to do it - and do it the way the programme says you should - you earn points.
Most people aren't born with habits of self-disclinine. Usually it's learned...
These points move you up to the next level in a "six-point plan", a method of acquiring "privileges". If you do not obey the rules, or as one former student told me, you cannot do what is required of you, you have to face the consequences.
I have a son in the Maryland State Police academy right now, who's living under the same rules. My sympathy meter isn't twinging at all.
One consequence is being sent to Observational Placement, or what is known to the kids as OP. On my way to the OP room I caught a glimpse of the sleeping dorms. They were furnished sparingly with thin, lumpy mattresses on wooden bed frames that fold up against the wall, and wooden shelves on which children have attempted to neatly fold the few items of clothing they are issued. In OP the children are made to lie on thin plastic mats on the floor, all day, sometimes day after day. They eat, sleep and stay in the room until the staff members guarding them decide they can leave. Shannon Levy told me she spent eight weeks in OP.
"Young lady, go to your room. And no terriblevision!" One assumes she was better behaved when she was allowed out...
To continue their education, the children work from text books and are partly self-taught. If they fail a test exam they do it again and again until they pass.
Gee, golly. Just like the state police here in Maryland. Come to think on it, that's the way lots of us learn: keep working on it until it finally sticks. Is the writer offering any more palatable options? Is there an easier way to learn?
Staff members are not trained teachers in all the subjects they supervise and are often recruited from the local community. During meals, students are bombarded with self-improvement messages over the tannoy. They are played over and over again. The children must then write essays about what they have learnt straight afterwards.
Terrible. Just terrible. I remember once having to write an essay on the contents of an Army security regulation as a sprout in uniform, punishment for my first security violation. There weren't any more, that I was aware of.
Despite its hard and strict methods, many parents like Megan Quinn - who placed her son in the school - are pleased with the results. Megan told me: "If it wasn't for the God-sent gift of this programme you'd be going to the lakeshore of Chicago where my father's buried, where my sister's buried, and putting flowers on his grave. So yes it hurts right now not to see him for 12 months but it would hurt a heck of a lot more not to see him for the rest of his life."
There are lots of teenaged brats like him. Scan the metro section of your local paper.
Other parents are not so convinced and taking legal action against WWASPs. "It was an act of desperation... and we were conned," said Julie Wilkinson, mother of ex-student Winston.
Don't feel like you got your money's worth? Child not what you expected? Or did you come to the conclusion that as a little adult, he shouldn't be required to do anything that was hard or good for him?
Concerns about the school's methods have also been raised by Bertrand Bainvel, head of the United Nations Children's Fund (Unicef), based in Jamaica. He wants OP scrapped, because he says: "There is a high possibility it falls under the definition of child abuse."
There are openings for abuse in the system as it's described, but that doesn't mean the abuse is there. Presumably they're inspected regularly to make sure it's not. It's hard to make a certain type of person understand that discipline and abuse aren't necessarily the same thing. And that over-indulgence is another form of abuse, more widely spread in the Western world.
In response to the criticism, WWASPs say: "The schools have a tremendous record of success and growth. They have helped thousands of teens and their families and have a 97% parent satisfaction rate." I began to consider a conversation I had earlier with the uncle of one young female student, as he tried to make his way past security to visit her. "They're criminalising adolescence," he said, and as I walked out of the gate beyond the high walls into the full tropical sunlight, I wondered if he was right.
It sounds to me more like they're taking adolescent criminals and trying to make something of them. Though I suppose I could be wrong...
Posted by:tipper

#6  Somwehat ironic thought - they are not that far away from Guantanamo - where another species of delinquents are enjoying long stretches in "Observational Placement."

I live in Thailand - where thousands of minor drug offenders are sent to what amounts to "boot camp" for three straight years. There are certainly recidivists - but many evidently get straightened out. Most are happy that they didn't fall into the "non-minor" drug offender category - whose members tend to be summarily executed in Thailand "while trying to escape."

Ranger school 1976 got my attention.
Posted by: Lone Ranger   2004-12-07 11:11:16 PM  

#5  As the fifth hand, I've known folks who've used these things. They've got kids who are out of control and whose next stop may be the slammer. They've also got perfectly normal kids who are being affected by having parents attention diverted to the live in juvenile delinquent.

Most of these kids have recreational drug problems that are dealt with using non-drug therapies. It can be a lot like boot camp in the sense of giving the kid a whole new self definition that repalces everything that was there before. If this is brainwashing, some need Clorox.

These parents have one helluva problem and don't get a lot of help from anyone. These situations are heart breaking and take a toll on marriages and everybody else in the family. I've missed this bullet on the first two. The third remains to be seen. I just hope my knowledge remains second hand.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-12-07 7:24:03 PM  

#4  On the fourth hand, I've heard a lot bad about these institutions; they allegedly escape regulation as schools because they're treatment centers of some sort, and escape regulation as mental hospitals because they're allegedly schools of some sort.

I've gotten the impression that these places are positively bad for anyone who actually has real mental problems that can't be improved by massive administration of antidepressants, tranquilizers, or brainwashing.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2004-12-07 6:41:28 PM  

#3  Sometimes I think these 'methods' are necessary. And often the parents bring it on themselves by (as the comments indicated) treating the adolescent as a 'adult' and not an 'adult-in-training'.

On the other hand I've heard of a lot of cases where the kid simply 'takes control' and, in effect, threatens the parents with the CPS (Child Protective Service here in WA). Often the kids learn this in school (both from the Administration and other kids...).

Often this is the only way a parent can 'fix' their mistake.

As for this reporter, one of these days he will find out that A) life is not fair, and B) Respect has to be earned.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-12-07 4:52:24 PM  

#2  Nobody is forcing anyone to send their kids to these schools, unlike the state school system for example.
Posted by: phil_b   2004-12-07 4:17:14 PM  

#1  Ahhh, these New Age parents! In the old days it was military school for the boys, and convent school for the girls. I imagine it was a good deal cheaper, too.

While I don't like the idea, for some over-the-edge youngsters this kind of thing is necessary. Yes it is brainwashing, but their old brains were leading them to self-destruction. Personally, I would try military/convent school first, with the threat of WWASP hanging over the kid's head, and parenting classes to make sure we aren't inadvertantly abetting the bad behaviour. This kind of thing should not be allowed to come as a surprise, but as a clear consequence of personal choices. But I'm funny that way.
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-12-07 3:29:34 PM  

00:00