You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
US documents report further abuse of Iraq prisoners
2004-12-08
Members of a US special operations task force punched and abused prisoners in Iraq in front of Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) agents and then threatened the agents to keep them quiet, a official document has revealed. A letter from the head of the DIA to a senior Pentagon intelligence official, which detailed previously unknown incidents of abuse by US forces on prisoners in Iraq, said the agents also saw detainees with burn marks and bruises. It was written two months after photographs of US soldiers abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib jail near Baghdad became public, and five months after American commanders in Iraq first learned of the Abu Ghraib abuse.

The Abu Ghraib revelations prompted international outrage and undercut US credibility as it sought to stabilise Iraq amid a bloody insurgency after last year's invasion. The new revelations of abuses elsewhere were included in a June 25 letter from Navy Vice Admiral Lowell Jacoby, director of the DIA, to Stephen Cambone, undersecretary of defence for intelligence. The letter was one of numerous US Government documents released by the American Civil Liberties Union, which obtained them under the Freedom of Information Act. Other documents depict a split between the Defence Department and the FBI over Pentagon use of harsh interrogation methods on prisoners. Vice Admiral Jacoby wrote that two unidentified DIA agents, who worked as interrogators and debriefers at a detention facility in Baghdad, saw task force officers "punch a prisoner in the face to the point the individual needed medical attention". Vice Admiral Jacoby said that "the debriefer was ordered to leave the room". The date of the incident was not stated.
Posted by:God Save The World

#7  GSTW - Lol! Awwwwww - didn't like what you read? Lol! Wotta cheesedick. FOAD

RC - ROFLMAO!!! I bow to your superior pithiness and dead-solid-perfect insight! :-)
Posted by: .com   2004-12-08 11:13:27 AM  

#6  RC heh heh
Posted by: Frank G   2004-12-08 8:06:19 AM  

#5  Or there are no details because the details would counter the thrust of the story. IE, it turns out the alleged abuse was actually self defense.

(And someone who names themselves "God Save The World" saying "get over yourself" is ironic as hell.)
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-12-08 8:03:25 AM  

#4  This article is a doozy. NY Times Agenda/reporting without all the fuzzy good feeling. Since it is in an Aussie newspaper, it could a plant given the source (ACLU)

Try this on for size:

Vice Admiral Jacoby wrote that two unidentified DIA agents, who worked as interrogators and debriefers at a detention facility in Baghdad, saw task force officers "punch a prisoner in the face to the point the individual needed medical attention". Vice Admiral Jacoby said that "the debriefer was ordered to leave the room". The date of the incident was not stated.

Now the article's premise is that 'abuses' of Iraqi prisoners took place after April 2003, after Abu Ghrab: So, the date of the incident is not known? Is the location unknown as well? Is the event even real?

Since this story is premised that government documents were released and information for this article are 'revelations' why is there no detail? Could it be there are no details (details that include facts ) becuase there are actually no documents?

Enquiring minds wanna know.
Posted by: badanov   2004-12-08 6:14:05 AM  

#3  If you had the option of matching my i.p address with Mikey, im sure you would discover im not the person your claiming me to be.
Posted by: God Save The World   2004-12-08 3:22:52 AM  

#2  awww, poor you. Read something you didnt like ? awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
Get over yourself
Posted by: God Save The World   2004-12-08 3:19:42 AM  

#1  GSTW - Your nym sucks. You sure you aren't Mikey in dysguyse?

Piss off, wankers.
Posted by: .com   2004-12-08 1:57:56 AM  

00:00