You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Banning Tiny Tim? Humbug!
2004-12-09
In Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol," Tiny Tim delivers one of the famed lines in literature: "God bless us, every one!" Along with "Bah, humbug," it's the story's signature. There's the Christmas setting along with some allusions to Christian ideals, but Tiny Tim's blessing is the tale's most overt reference to religion. Yet that was too much for Lake Washington High School in Kirkland. Students were to see a staging of Dickens' story on Dec. 17, but the principal has canceled it, in part because it raised the issue of religion in the public schools. Ah, it's that special time of year, when the spirit of the season is more about offending no one than celebrating anything.
Except that I think you've got that backward: it's about offending as many people as possible to demonstrate how much more virtuous the offenders are.
Schools and libraries ban Christmas trees. Holiday concerts replace Handel's "Messiah" with bland numbers such as "Frosty the Snowman." This year the controversy has boiled over in New Jersey, where a school banned religious carols. In Denver, people were barred from singing hymns in a parade. And in Italy, a teacher told Muslim students to replace the word "Jesus" with "virtue" if it helped them sing a Christmas carol. The motivation is always well-meaning: to keep religion from distressing anyone in the diverse public square.
Nope. Sorry. I just don't buy that the motivation is well-meaning. See my comments above. As a practicing agnostic, I find the actions offensive and small-souled. I don't consider myself sufficiently superior to my fellow citizens to demand that they stop doing what they like to do because it might offend me in some way. In fact, I fall pretty comfortably into the Christmas spirit. Our house has two Christmas trees, one in the living room and one in the family room, plus a wreath on the door. We send Christmas cards and I enjoy Christmas carols, though after hearing them every day for a month I'm usually ready to listen to something else come the day after Christmas. We took 2-year-old Titus to see the Polar Express and I found it charming. We'll watch It's a Wonderful Life and I'll get choked up (unlike La Dowd). You don't have to be a Christian to do any of that.
As a secularist and agnostic who doesn't subscribe to any particular religious doctrine, it's a goal I support.
Even as a secularist and an agnostic, I don't. It's not my place to tell other what to do. I'm not in charge, and even if I was, I wouldn't.
But even a lifelong doubter like me can see that something crucial is being lost, especially in the schools. If kids can't see a Charles Dickens play, hasn't the cause of separating church and state gone too far?
Demonstrably so. Let a hundred flowers bloom, as an old atheist once ordered...
Dickens said "A Christmas Carol" was nothing more than a "ghostly little book." With its apparitions of hope and death, it's more supernatural morality tale than religious dogma. He hated the institution of his Christian faith, the Church of England. He's considered the father of the modern secular Christmas, in which many of us celebrate with friends and family instead of attending a church service. Yes, the work has Christian themes. So what? The students can handle it. They might even learn something — about Christianity, or redemption. Or about good storytelling. Banning "A Christmas Carol" because it says too much about religion is like banning "A Catcher in the Rye" because it says too much about adolescence. And that goes for much of the rest of this seasonal controversy. We fall all over ourselves to keep religion from the schools. Yet a major gap in my public education was the lack of religion in the schools. I learned a lot about math and science and literature, and literally nothing about the belief systems of billions of the world's people — an educational hole as stunning as if they'd decided not to teach, say, world history. The schools say they walk a fine line. Religious holidays can be taught, not observed. If Charles Dickens is over that line, then I don't have much faith today's kids are learning any more about religion than I did.
Posted by:Fred

#8  "Tolerance" has become a PC byword for secular-based spiritual ABSOLUTISM and societal-national CANTONIZATION. Organized Religion for the most part gen motivates and teaches youth and individuals to personally strive for self-improvement, whether individualist or group-oriented, which SCIENCE AND INTELLECTUALISM DOES NOT. CANTONIZATION ultim devolutes to national-/political CONFEDERATISM which history has repeatedly shown to again lead to the dissolution of organized nation-states/societies. REMEMBER THIS ALSO, THE LEFT DEMANDS THIS OF AMERICA ADN THE WEST, BUT DOES NOT DEMAND IT OF COMMUNIST/COMMUNISM-CENTRIC RUSSIA-CHINA, ETAL. - you know, alleged National and International [now GLOBAL]"EQUALISM"!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2004-12-09 8:48:36 PM  

#7  


He may get a visit... Draw the shades, "Mr. Robertson", Lock the doors, "Mr. Robertson", he will still come, "Mr. Robertson!" Just as he did to Scrooge!!!...
Posted by: BigEd   2004-12-09 5:56:00 PM  

#6  Administration of Lake Washington High School in Kirkland, WA.

This guy doesn't know the grief that the woman who is principal of the Elementary School in Cupertino, CA is taking for banning THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE from a 5th grade teacher's classroom. I have a feeling "Mr. Robertson" is about to feel some heat.

"God Bless us everyone..."
Posted by: BigEd   2004-12-09 5:39:15 PM  

#5  Count me in. My Jewish by choice elder daughter told me yesterday that decorating the Christmas tree with her father (its his holiday, so I play the support role and get the ornaments out of the box) is her favourite part of Christmas -- better even than getting presents. And while there is a lot of lovely music in the Jewish repertoire, Hanukkah songs are just that, and no match for Handel's Messiah, or even Silent Night. Some people choose to be hypersensitive.
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-12-09 3:27:49 PM  

#4  Christmas trees are Pagan. This seems like discrimination agains Pagans. And wreaths. Don't get me started on them too.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-12-09 11:24:25 AM  

#3  Amen Fred. Your self description fits me to a tee.

I love everything about Christmas and though I don't believe in God or Jesus; the underlying principles are the basis of much that is good in Western civilization. I've yet to hear the Christmas carol that says kill the infidels, not even kill the Democrats.
Posted by: AlanC   2004-12-09 11:21:02 AM  

#2  I learned a lot about math and science and literature, and literally nothing about the belief systems of billions of the world's people — an educational hole as stunning as if they'd decided not to teach, say, world history.

One of the better classes I took in college was a comparative religions course. Then again, I went to a Catholic college that wasn't run by the weenies who are out banning Christmas carols.
Posted by: Steve White   2004-12-09 1:57:40 AM  

#1  Schools and libraries ban Christmas trees

Yes I can understand the sentiment. At this time of the year, a street corner close to where I live used to be the home of a tall, beautifully decorated Christmas tree. This year they have replaced it with a tall, colorful, sparkling...rocket or something, I have no idea what it is.
Posted by: Rafael   2004-12-09 12:50:22 AM  

00:00