You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
US spying on ElBaradei, seeking to oust him: report
2004-12-12
Sounds eminently sensible to me...
US President George W. Bush's administration has listened in on phone calls between Mohamed ElBaradei and Iranian diplomats, seeking ammunition to oust ElBaradei as head of the UN nuclear watchdog agency, the Washington Post said on Sunday. "The intercepted calls have not produced any evidence of nefarious conduct by ElBaradei," the Post said, quoting three unnamed US officials who had read the transcripts.
Since this is a rather sensitive item, I'd guess that's why the Post is reporting on it.
"Some people think he sounds way too soft on the Iranians, but that's about it," one official was quoted as saying. The United States wants the UN International Atomic Energy Agency, which ElBaradei heads, to report Iran to the UN Security Council for possible sanctions over what Washington says is a covert nuclear weapons program. But ElBaradei says the "jury is still out" on whether Tehran's program is peaceful or not. The Egyptian diplomat, 62, also earned the ire of Washington by questioning US intelligence on Iraq. The Bush administration opposes his winning a third term in 2005 as IAEA chief. The official US position is that heads of international organizations should not serve more than two terms, as ElBaradei will have done by next year.
Posted by:Fred

#5  A former spook on Fox put it another way:
Would the CIA be doing its job if they weren't spying on the Iranians?

Well, if Elbaradei is talking to them, we get Elbaradei, too.

Signals folks are just doing their jobs - and targeting the Mad Mullahs is logical tasking - good on 'em.
Posted by: .com   2004-12-12 8:40:16 PM  

#4  since the WaPost got the intel, probably same time as the Admin, I'm guessing the CIA was in on the surveillance...
Posted by: Frank G   2004-12-12 8:17:11 PM  

#3  No news here. We can move along...
Posted by: Tom   2004-12-12 7:30:14 PM  

#2  Lol - if only WaPoo knew what Dubya has on them, lol! Wotta buncha twitters for being surprised and wotta buncha Luddites for not realizing they're penetrated (and in all the myriad ways that term can be employed, heh), as well.

WaPoo is still digital cage-liner - and only #2 to the NYT who's prolly jealous they didn't "scoop" 'em on this obvious piece of obvious "skeer" fluff.
Posted by: .com   2004-12-12 5:22:24 PM  

#1  I would be spying on him because I don't trust him. I would make it obvious too. Move all the socks out of their drawer and put them in the underware drawer. Make sure a shit load of calls to 900 pr0n places end up on his bill. Send flowers to his wife expressing symathy for he loss. Turn a few snakes loose in his car. Do little stuff like that until he goes stark raving bonkers.

Oh yea no 3rd term. He is as useless as Blix. He has stopped zero non nuclear nations from becoming nuclear and it actually looks like he is helping Iran.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2004-12-12 5:21:26 PM  

00:00