You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Royal, and Fragile, Saudi Air Force
2004-12-14
December 14, 2004: How good is the Royal Saudi Air Force? Well, on paper, it is a formidable force. The Saudis have built their Air Force around variants of the F-15 Eagle (about 70 F-15C, 22 F-15D, and 72 F-15S). They are able to buy the latest available electronic systems. If the Americans won't sell it, someone in Europe might, which is how Saudi Arabia became one of the major users of the Tornado, possessing a force on par with Italy's.

Saudi F-15S strike fighters have dumbed-down electronics (particularly the APG-70 radars), which does not make the Saudis happy. Saudi Arabia has had minor incidents with Iran in the past, and Iran back then was able to buy the latest air force equipment. The problem is Israel, which is also a heavy user of the F-15, and vigorously opposes Saudi Arabia (which officially proclaims that Israel must be destroyed) getting the most modern F-14 systems. Thus Saudi Arabia has not been able to acquire AMRAAMs air-to-air missiles. Israel also imposes, vis the United States conditions, like where the Saudis can base their F-15s. For example, they cannot be operated out of Tabuk, in northwestern Saudi Arabia. But while they have a lot of modern aircraft (in addition to their F-15 force, they have 24 Tornado ADVs and 48 Tornado IDSs), how effective are they?

Saudi pilots have been able to defeat Iranian and Iraqi opponents. However, the brief successes have masked problems. Even simple maintenance of military equipment is often farmed out to foreign contractors. For instance, in 1990, the Saudis complained that their M-60 main battle tanks were defective. The problem turned out to be failure to change a filter. Similar problems exist with the Royal Saudi Air Force, and this is much more degrading to its combat ability. A tank with a mechanical problem that comes up in training operations will often be recoverable and fixable. A plane with problems during a training mission will crash, rendering it as much of a loss as if it were shot down in combat — and it will sometimes kill a pilot (or the two-man crew), which is a multi-million dollar investment in and of itself. The Saudis can afford the pilots, and they can afford a lot of help from expatriates for maintenance.

The Saudis have a good force, but its effectiveness is heavily reliant on good ties with the United States for vital spare parts and maintenance. Should ties with the United States go downhill, the force of F-15s — the bulk of the modern Saudi air force — will be grounded because the American sources of spare parts and expatriate contractors will be pulled out. In essence, the Royal Saudi Air Force's effectiveness will be high as long as they stay on good terms with the United States.
And keep their expatriate contract maintenance troops from bugging out one step ahead of the jihadis
Posted by:Steve

#6  That F-15S modified Strike Eagle, the S stands for slaved.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-12-14 4:55:00 PM  

#5  This article is relevant to one posted last week on Saudization although that one focused on the civilian sector.

There was a gap of 9 years between my jobs in Saudi. Willahi, nothing had changed in the interim. By this, I mean the willingness of the Saudi govt (SAG) to push for meaningful training programs that actually cut deadwood rather than recycle it ad nauseum. The only place I know of in the Kingdom that creates competent people is the King Fahad U of petroleum and minerals. But that was basically a creation of Aramco.

I worked in the aviation field there and heard a lot of anecdotal talk about why Saudis can't maintain planes (from westerners) and anecdotal talk about why westerners don't want to train competent Saudi personnel (from Saudis) Obviously, the real answer is in the middle for all training done in-Kingdom, but with more than a whiff of blame on the Saudi side.
Posted by: chicago mike   2004-12-14 1:09:28 PM  

#4  Only foreign market for the F-14 was Iran, not Israel. In air wars, training is everything, and if you know you don't have a chance in Hell of winning the battle in the air, might as well lose it on the ground by downing the aircraft when ordered to launch.
Posted by: longtime lurker   2004-12-14 11:34:22 AM  

#3  tw - Lol! Excellent, heh.
Posted by: .com   2004-12-14 11:32:03 AM  

#2  Don't forget the hammer, .com. So very useful for pounding sand, so I imagine they've become quite adept with it ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-12-14 11:28:05 AM  

#1  Insh'allah's a bitch on the maintenance of high-tech equipment - say anything more complex than a crowbar.
Posted by: .com   2004-12-14 11:06:54 AM  

00:00