You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Tsunami: The president of the super empire didn't even say: I'm sorry.
2005-01-09
This meme's taken form pretty solidly by now. Nothing we do, no matter what, to include giving our entire Gross National Product to the effected countries, will be enough. A year from now, when the bodies have all been buried and the stench is gone away and the areas are being rebuilt with American money but without American participation because that would offend Muslim sensibilities, it'll be common knowledge that the U.S. kicked in a pittance, for mere form's sake, while the rest of the world, under the far-sighted leadership of the UN, rolled up its sleeve and went to work. You read it here first.
What makes a great person great? My uncle asked me once, and then volunteered an answer: To act great. You can't lead if you only push. You need to set a good example for people to follow. There will be occasions when only the great ones can make a stand, a lead, and a difference. It is not easy, simple or free. You pay to be great. Stands cost you, setting examples tax you, and leading a crowd requires time, intelligence and effort. You can't be a leader, even by force, if you are selfish. Sometimes you must sacrifice your own interests for those you lead.

Not all people are up to it and can afford it, but those who do deserve our utmost love, trust and respect. They earn our loyalty and obedience. They are the best. People recognize greatness when they see it in deeds, more than in words. Even the simple ones can distinguish the great ones from the bullies; the righteous from the false, the selfless from the selfish, those who care for them, and those who only care for themselves. I used to argue that sometimes people could be fooled. Satan has the greatest following. Hitler persuaded his people and led them to disaster. Stalin and Mao pushed them to catastrophe. Castro, Nasser and Saddam fooled and pushed their way to "greatness". Not all great ones are great after all, and there is more than an ideal way to be one.

Uncle was adamant, I thought then: You can fool some people all the time, or all people sometime, but you cannot fool all people all the time. All your examples, Khaled, are of leaders who either stole their status or faked it. History exposed and put them in the black lists of great disasters. My uncle is dead now. I wish he waited a little longer. I wanted to tell him how right he was. Weeks after his departure, tsunami hit and put our great ones on trial. Few proved themselves worthy of greatness; most were caught naked.
Posted by:tipper

#10  Satan has the greatest following.

Dead giveaway for major self-loathing issues. If Satan (or whatever other superstitious label you wish to give misfortune) really did prevail in this universe, we would all be dead by now. This is the same exact twisted mindset that brought you Original Sin and all the other forms of pessimistic mind death.

Good, as a life-giving force, continues to predominate precisely because it is good and promotes abundance. Claiming that evil actually prevails is merely a self-indictment of personal cowardice in fighting inhumanity wherever it surfaces.

... areas are being rebuilt with American money but without American participation because that would offend Muslim sensibilities ...

If accepting American aid offends their "Muslim sensibilities" I say make their dreams come true and let them rot without it. This crap has got to end. No more taking our money and then spitting on us.

If people want to take American aid and then conspire against us, it should cost them their lives. Those who accept our help only so that they may turn it against us deserve death. The time is long overdue to teach these ingrates that they cannot have it both ways. If all they're going to do is breed up more ingrates like themselves, then let them all die.

We no longer have the luxury of thinking that our military might can protect us from those duplictous individuals or cultures who accept our assistance only so that they may use the leisure it buys them to unleash atrocities against us. Weapons of mass destruction have forever changed the formula of power.

We must quickly adopt a more prudent approach to dealing with hostile cultures. Facilitating the recovery of those who would just as soon kill us all is tantamount to suicide. This world can do without societies who are unwilling to coexist peacefully in a pluralistic world.

If any of these disaster-stricken countries cannot bring themselves to pledge an oath of tolerance for other cultures, they can rot in hell.
Posted by: Zenster   2005-01-09 5:55:56 PM  

#9  Nothing we do, no matter what...will be enough.

I'm surprised it took you this long to conclude this, Fred. I discovered it only a few days after 9/11, when the letters to the Sydney Morning Herald informed me that anything the US had ever done, or failed to do, was wrong.

If the US takes action (e.g. Iraq), that's wrong. If the US fails to take action (e.g. East Timor), that's also wrong. The US alone has the luxury of action; other powers only move in reaction to US actions. This makes the US responsible for the wrongs of any power, any where. For example, the US is responsible for all the wrongs of Saudi Arabia, since we "support" that regime, but it's also responsible for the wrongs of North Korea, since we oppose it.

This article from last April is by Elinor Burkett, an American teaching in Kyrgyzstan. She started teaching in August, 2001. Scroll down a bit to read her experiences after 9/11. Muslims don't attack other Muslims. America is always attacking Muslims. The Russians, on the other hand, are our brothers. America got what it deserved for meddling, but if we are attacked, America must defend us.

There's much more. Burkett ends up blaming the government-controlled press in that region for disinformation. But a glance at the free Western press shows that a government is not necessary to obscure the truth.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2005-01-09 3:14:43 PM  

#8  Carriers are so cold don't ya know SteveS.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-01-09 12:29:07 PM  

#7  What an asshat! I like the way all these discussions about money ignore the aircraft carrier and other naval assets the US provided.
Posted by: SteveS   2005-01-09 12:14:13 PM  

#6  "Japan, the No. 2 economic powerhouse donated $500 million to America’s $350 million"
May I ask what your oil-rich monarchy threw in?

Just what we need -- a lecture on charity and world government from Saudi Arabia. A country that supplied us most of the 9/11 terrorists, routinely abuses women and non-Muslims, does not offer aid to non-Muslims, and is not even close to being a democracy.

"We need a system that is free from self-interests"
Agreed -- I am increasingly convinced that the world needs to be freed of Islamic fundamentalist self-interests. Time is running out for peaceful and tolerant Muslims to bring Islam to peace and tolerance. If there is not a reformation before some further large provocation of the West, then there will be a sudden and brutal retaliation that will make the war in Afghanistan look like a boy scout camp-out and will be the abrupt end of the centers of Islam.
Posted by: Tom   2005-01-09 12:08:24 PM  

#5  I feel so bad and small. Is AB around?
Posted by: Shipman   2005-01-09 11:39:38 AM  

#4  What's this clown's address? I want to make damn sure we don't help him should he need it. Wouldn't want to challenge his world view, old boy.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-01-09 11:24:16 AM  

#3  "America finally led global effort..."

Not "finally" you idiot. America was the first to do it and still does.
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-01-09 10:43:47 AM  

#2  Never trust a Muslim.
Posted by: Unaling Elminelet3176   2005-01-09 10:09:25 AM  

#1  Wow, I'll bet his arm is really tired.
Posted by: .com   2005-01-09 9:56:55 AM  

00:00