You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
UK Election '05: Labour accused of anti-Semitism in posters depicting Conservative leadership
2005-02-01
Labour yesterday withdrew two election posters depicting Michael Howard as a "Fagin" figure and a flying pig after MPs and Jewish groups said they left the party open to charges of anti-Semitism. A spokesman said the posters would not be used and conceded that lessons would be learned. But the party refused to issue a formal apology and insisted that the posters were not anti-Semitic. It was clear, however, that the leadership realised it had blundered. The poster that caused most offence showed Mr Howard swinging a pocket watch on a chain and saying: "I can spend the same money twice." Critics said it had echoes of Dickens's Jewish pickpocket, Fagin, or Shylock from The Merchant of Venice. Another poster depicted Mr Howard and Mr Letwin, both of whom are of Jewish descent, as flying pigs with the same message about Tory sums not adding up. Jews regard pigs as unclean.

Louise Ellman, Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside, who is Jewish and a vice-chairman of the Labour Friends of Israel, said the poster showing Mr Howard looking like a Shylock or Fagin figure was unacceptable. "I think it is very insensitive," she said. "I do not think it is deliberately anti-Semitic but we should not have such posters." Harry Cohen, another Jewish Labour MP, said he did not believe there was any intended anti-Semitism but that those responsible had not thought hard enough that they might cause offence. Fraser Kemp, Labour's deputy campaign co-ordinator, said Mr Howard was a link with economic failures of the past and that Labour had a right to highlight his record. Denying charges of anti-Semitism, he said the use of the fob watch was intended to show that the Tories would hypnotise people into thinking they would create a better economy, when the reverse would be the case.
Posted by:Bulldog

#5  Now what if they had portrayed two Muslims?

but they didn't.
Posted by: PlanetDan   2005-02-01 1:24:02 PM  

#4  Now what if they had portrayed two Muslims?
Posted by: Omavinter Phomble2669   2005-02-01 12:38:11 PM  

#3  " . . . done on purpose? I doubt it, knowing the sensitivities of the big gay touchy-feely Labour Party"

Absolutely Wrong. The Left is where anti-semitism resides, these days.

I think they knew exactly what they were doing. Read this link from the Times of London:
Fagin, Shylock and Blair
Posted by: PlanetDan   2005-02-01 10:50:19 AM  

#2  Another case for the PC busybods.. a definite gaffe, but done on purpose? I doubt it, knowing the sensitivities of the big gay touchy-feely Labour Party.
Posted by: Howard UK   2005-02-01 9:27:37 AM  

#1  Not deliberate antisemitism That seems to need saying entirely too often to make me comfortable.
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-02-01 6:35:39 AM  

00:00