You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Germany holds up contract sale of armored cars to Israel
2005-02-01
The German government is holding up the signing of a contract for the sale of Dingo armored cars to Israel for fear that the Israel Defense Forces will use them against the Palestinians.

Yes, indeed, Germany will never forget the lessons of the Holocaust.

In talks over recent weeks with senior Israeli officials, the Germans have said they have no objection in principle to approving the sale of the all-purpose vehicles, but that it is "a problem of timing."

The IDF decided to acquire 100 Dingo-2 armored cars for the transportation of troops and for patrols, particularly in the territories. The deal is worth some $60 million.

The armored cars, due to be the first of their kind in the IDF, are supposed to replace the more cumbersome, high maintenance M-116 Armored Personnel Carriers that have carried the troops since the 1960s, and which provide less protection.

The IDF was searching for both a heavy APC that would provide protection against missiles and a lighter armored car that could be used on paved roads and rough ground.

In order to use American military aid for the purchase, the Israeli Defense Ministry arranged for the transfer of the know-how and production from the German Krauss-Maffei Wegmann firm to the American firm, Textron. It was agreed that the American firm would produce most of the parts in the U.S. while certain parts, including the engine that is manufactured by a subsidiary of Mercedes, would be manufactured in Germany and sent to the U.S.

The contract was signed at the beginning of last summer, and since then most of the agreements between Textron and the Defense Ministry have been completed. However the parallel contract that Textron was supposed to sign with the German producer has been held up.

The Dingo-2 is an air transportable, armored mine-proof vehicle, based on a commercial chassis produced by DaimlerChrysler, designed for high mobility in any type of terrain. The vehicle is fitted with an armored cage protecting the passengers, engine compartment, fuel tank and cargo bay. The modular, repairable armor provides protection against all types of hand-held weapons, as well as artillery fragments up to 155mm.

In addition, it is fitted with an oblique "blast deflector" floor, providing crew protection against heavy anti-tank mines and anti-personnel mines. It is designed to travel at speeds of up to 90 kms per hour, and has a range of 1,000 kms. The diesel-powered vehicle can carry
eight fully equipped troops.

The IDF plans to fit the Dingo-2 with a "lethal" overhead weapon station that was developed at Rafael, Israel's Armament Development Authority, and which can operate two types of machine guns and an automatic grenade-launcher.

Sources in the defense establishment expressed hopes Monday that the deal would be sped up by progress in the talks being held between Israel and the Palestinians, and the planned disengagement plan which will take the IDF out of the Gaza Strip.
Posted by:trailing wife

#5  Those babies took our dingoes!
Posted by: Grunter   2005-02-01 10:54:02 PM  

#4  Glad to hear it, TGA. What do you hear about one of the Gulf States buying a large chunk of Daimler-Chrysler? Is that likely to affect future contracts?
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-02-01 4:28:04 PM  

#3  Nah, just the usual German red tape proceedings when it comes to military exports. The Israelis are just trying to speed things up a little, thats all.

Pic of the Dingo here
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-02-01 2:45:29 PM  

#2  Live and learn.
Posted by: gromgorru   2005-02-01 12:20:31 PM  

#1  Cancel all payments, find another supplier. Do you think there's any chance that Germany's next contract with the People's Republic of China will get held up over similar concerns about potential use and human rights? Nah, didn't think so.
Posted by: Prince Abdullah   2005-02-01 9:03:35 AM  

00:00