You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
The Mystery Missiles of Washington DC
2005-02-01
Washington DC area commuters driving down Barton Parkway in Potomac, Maryland couldn't help but notice what looked like a box like missile launcher on the grounds of the old Naval Surface Warfare Center. The launcher did not look like anything familiar. It was smaller than the four missile Patriot container, and this one appeared to be holding six missiles. It turned out that NORAD (the North American Air Defense Command), was in charge of the launcher, and was not saying anything.

However, a little research revealed that the mystery launcher was the surface-to-air version of the U.S. air-to-air AMRAAM missile. First developed by Norway, the system has been adopted by several other countries (including Spain and Kuwait). The U.S. Marines are developing their own version, called CLAWS. This system will have AMRAAMs fired from a launcher mounted on a hummer. The box launcher seen outside DC is from the Norwegian system (called NASAMS). The ground launched AMRAAM has a range of about twenty kilometers, and can hit targets as high as 13,000 feet. NASAMS was developed so that it could easily work with different search radars. The 350 pound AMRAAM SAM costs more (about $600,000 each) compared to the air-to-air version (about $380,000), but is basically the same missile. The twelve foot long AMRAAM has its own radar, for ensuring a hit once it has been guided to the vicinity of the target. The missile has a fifty pound warhead, and can take down just about anything that flies, including wide-body commercial transports. The AMRAAMs outside DC are apparently for defense against suicidal pilots, or any unauthorized aircraft in the area that refuse to leave restricted air space.
I guess somebody came to the conclusion that the Stingers were not up to the job of bringing down large aircraft. Nice to see they have gotten past the "Not Invented Here" barrier and purchased the Norwegian system off the shelf.
Posted by:Steve

#6  SLAMRAAM video
Posted by: ed   2005-02-01 6:17:07 PM  

#5  is this an option on the H2? I might consider it then
Posted by: Frank G   2005-02-01 3:56:25 PM  

#4  Hurrah! I always liked the NASAMS system. It just struck me as nifty, using an AMRAAM from the ground. Why wouldn't it work? It even has a surface-to-surface engagement mode.

AMRAAM also has been demonstrated on a HMMWV-based system, called HUMRAAM. Cool!
Posted by: gromky   2005-02-01 3:52:04 PM  

#3  Also interesting is why they haven't erected a "vanity shield" around the device.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-02-01 12:29:41 PM  

#2  
Nice to see they have gotten past the "Not Invented Here" barrier and purchased the Norwegian system off the shelf.


Not surprising to note U.S. technology in the cornerstone piece (AMRAAM).
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-02-01 12:04:46 PM  

#1  Maybe I'll drive over and take a peek...
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-02-01 11:43:26 AM  

00:00