You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks & Islam
Analysis: Zarqawi a Convenient Villain?
2005-02-07
By FAWAZ A. GERGES
Jan. 30, 2005 — If President Bush wanted to conjure up someone from central casting to act as a foil to his inauguration call for worldwide freedom, he couldn't ask for a villain more fitting than the terrorist leader Abu Musab Zarqawi, who, on the eve of Iraqi elections, denounced democracy as an "evil principle."
He's not the first Islamist "thinker" who's done so, only the most recent.
In a widely disseminated Internet audiotape, Zarqawi didn't merely say that he opposed the mechanics or timing of the U.S.-run elections being held today in Iraq to choose a 275-member assembly and transitional government. And he didn't say he thought Iraqis should wait and vote after U.S. occupation forces depart. No, Zarqawi said that he opposes any elections under any circumstances. In doing so, he sets up a clash with more at stake than the outcome of the elections in Iraq.
Fawaz, we're already in the clash. Didn't you get the memo?
In the audiotape, which surfaced last Sunday, Zarqawi, the most feared and wanted militant in Iraq, declared a "fierce war" against all those "apostates" who take part in the elections. He called candidates running in the elections "demi-idols" and the people who plan to vote for them "infidels." And he railed against democracy because he said it supplants the rule of God with that of a popular majority. This wicked system, he said disapprovingly, is based on "freedom of religion and belief" and "freedom of speech" and on "separation of religion and politics." Democracy, he added, is "heresy itself."
To a proper Salafist, there's nothing unusual in those statements. The desired state is a caliphate, with the fat guy with the jeweled turban running things in accordance with the dictates of holy men.
The questions Zarqawi raises go way beyond the elections in Iraq to the whole issue of modernization of the Arab world. Is democracy un-Islamic? Is there a fundamental clash between the principles of representative government and the principles of Islam?
There certainly is with the principles of Salafism, isn't there?
Increasingly, Muslims themselves are saying no. A small but influential group of Islamic intellectuals is saying that Muslims should see democracy as compatible with Islam. Islamic political parties and movements across North Africa and the Middle East are deciding with greater frequency to take part in elections whenever possible.
That's kind of a vague statement. Some are, but many — especially the ones that expect to lose — have the habit of boycotting elections.
In the Palestinian Authority balloting, the radical Islamic Resistance Movement, known as Hamas, has entered candidates in races for local offices. In Egypt, Islamic political activists are urging President Hosni Mubarak to retire and permit free elections. And in Iraq, Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, the revered Shiite cleric, issued an edict saying participation in the balloting today was a "religious duty." That explains, in part, the recent increase in violence in Iraq. Zarqawi and other foes of democracy cannot rely on public sentiment to keep people away from the polls. Instead they must turn to fear, instilled by suicide bombings and brutal attacks. Hardly a day has gone by without insurgents threatening to "wash the streets of Baghdad with the voters' blood."
We're back to the basic principles of fascism here: Fearless Leader's will is to be imposed by cracking heads, or in this case by cutting them off...
The intimidation campaign is relentless. "Oh people, be careful. Be careful not to be near the centers of blasphemy and vice, the polling centers. 
 Don't blame us but blame yourselves" if you are harmed, a Web statement issued in the group's name last week said.
"We bear no responsibility for our own actions. The responsibility accrues to the group."
Zarqawi's diatribe against democracy echoed the views of Osama bin Laden who, in an audiotape broadcast in December, endorsed Zarqawi as his deputy in Iraq and called for a boycott of the Iraqi elections. "In the balance of Islam, this constitution is heresy, and therefore everyone who participates in this election will be considered infidels," bin Laden said.
That's kind of the essence of the War on Terror, isn't it?
Posted by:Fred

#4  MHW

You didn't pay attention. You are talking about government BY the Mullahs. That is not the problem. The problem is that even when governement is in hands of a non-mullah it is supposed to act exactly like it would act if ruled by a Mullah: like make war for spreading Islam, enforcing Shariah or treating non-Muslims
as subhumans. For instance Shariah says that non-Muslims shouldn't be in positions of authority so whenever a sultan or emir tried to put a Christian or Jew in a position of responsability the Mullahs provoked such riots he was forced to abandon the idea. At times, Sultans asked the dhimmi to feign conversion before taking charge. But it meant his children or grand-children would be raised and brainwashed as Muslims.

A nice analogy was Czechoslovaquia during the Stalinist purges: the President, the Party Chief (ie the guy who was supposed to rule Czechoslowaquia) and the Chief of the Secret Services were, along with many others, told to be traitors and executed. In a "normal" state this cannot happen since these guys had all the powers needed to block any investigation (don't mention Watergate, Nixon had not the powers these guys had) and do away with the accusers. But while they gave the orders the fact is that at any moment these orders could be overruled by orders coming from Stalin and that the Czech police, secret service, military would obey the orders coming from Moscow not those from their nominaml bosses.

As I said Islam is incompatible with Democracy: the discriminations I talked about are in the Koran (read it please) and you need to know what the Koran is supposed to be: a book who wasn't created by Allah but who existed alongside with it for all eternity, a book who is supposed to have been given to Muhammad and having being kept completely unaltered (not a single comma added or removed) and who cannot be altered. So when the Koran says: treat the women like this, the dhimmis like that and "remove Christians and Jews from the Arabic pensinula" there is nothing you can say against it, nothing if you are a real Muslim. And if you aren't then you are an apostate and you will be killed
Posted by: JFM   2005-02-07 5:49:08 PM  

#3  Zarqawi does make about as good a villian as can be imagined. A foreign villian who indiscriminately murders Iraqi men, women, and children; declares all voters to be infidels (them's fighting words); and is such a "hands on" leader he insists on doing the beheading himself. Its like he is a cartoon character of a villian. In comparison, Bush looks like an American Dudley Doright. We already know who's going to win - we've seen it before.
Posted by: Hank   2005-02-07 3:48:39 PM  

#2  JFM
Well here we go with a little problem with the variations of Islam.

In pre Khomeini Shiite Islam, the rule was that no Mullah could be part of the govt until the coming of their messiah (the 12th Iman) - so in that version of Islam, democracy would be compatible.

Granted that Khomeini changed things so Iran has become an 'islamic paradise'.

Even under the Sunni Caliph, there were times when all the Imans considered government to be too worldly and sat outside the government.
Posted by: mhw   2005-02-07 9:54:05 AM  

#1  A small but influential group of Islamic intellectuals is saying that Muslims should see democracy as compatible with Islam.

The truth is that Zarquawi is right and the intellectuals are wrong: Islam is incompatible with democracy. Just think in the status given to women and minorities, or in the Koranic (not in the haddith, in the Koran) penalties on aposthasy or in the Koranic calls to ethnic cleansing of the Arabic peninsula. Real progress will have be made when people will dare to say: "Fuck Koran. It has only brought us misery" and survive after having said it.
Posted by: JFM   2005-02-07 1:40:25 AM  

00:00