You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Saudi oil minister says attacking oil facilities almost impossible
2005-02-09
RIYADH - Saudi Oil Minister Ali Naimi said on Tuesday that the kingdom has invested heavily in security for its oil installations and the threat of attacks against them is almost "impossible."
This guy is wearing a giant "kick me" sign on his ass.
Naimi said any attacks, should they happen, would not impact Saudi Arabia's oil production and exports. "Although a high level of security has been in place for decades on oil installations, we have, over the past year, taken additional measures to negate any possibility of a terror act, even if this possibility is slim," he said.

Naimi spoke on the sidelines of a four-day anti-terrorism conference, which wrapped up Tuesday. Delegates from more than 50 countries and international organizations urged in a joint declaration closer cooperation and coordination among nations in the fight against terrorism.

Late last year, Osama bin Laden, the leader of the Al Qaeda terror network, urged his followers to attack the kingdom's oil installations to weaken both the West and the Saudi royal family. "The oil installations have not been attacked, despite the aim of the terror leaders. Oil installations in the kingdom are under concentrated protection on different levels, which makes it difficult, if not impossible, for terrorists to reach them. If it happens, the impact on the kingdom's production and exports will be negligible," Naimi said.

Terror attacks in the kingdom have targeted security forces and foreign workers, some employed in the oil industry, but none have been against oil installations. Naimi said that there has been a "substantial effort exerted by the kingdom in protecting its facilities. There is always more to be done, but I think we are confident today that our facilities are very, very inaccessible to intruders."

"Any statement by leaders of terror organizations about our facilities will always be taken seriously," Naimi said. State-run oil company Saudi Aramco boasted 7,000 security staff some of whom are furriners and actually know what they're doing and "our objective is zero-impact of terror activities on all our facilities."

Pressed on the departure of some essential foreign workers in the wake of attacks last year, Naimi said: "There's no need for anxiety in this area. It has been sensationalized more than it should be. I believe the reaction by a few countries to discourage their citizens from coming to Saudi Arabia was somewhat exaggerated."
"I mean, there's less than a one in four chance they'll be decapitated," he explained further.
Saudi Arabia, he added, is far more secure than many other oil-producing countries.
Doncha just feel reassured?
Posted by:Steve White

#4  .com hit it on the head: nothing is SA is secure because all the terrorism there is an inside job.
Posted by: Spot   2005-02-09 9:22:26 AM  

#3  How much are you willing to bet, prince?
Posted by: gromgorru   2005-02-09 6:52:17 AM  

#2  Heh, Dr Steve, SoT...

Indeed, the Ras Tanura Terminal would be vulnerable from the water - but the Gulf maxes out at 90 ft, so I'm thinking a barge loaded up would work on taking out the docks - and another with RPG guys could handle the tank farm. I'm not sure about Abqaiq - I could email someone to find out, but I haven't been to that facility, myself.

It's all a pacifier for the oil markets and contract partners. If we recall the Jeddah attack last year, the security guy let the baddies in - IIRC, one (or more) of them was related. Security to Naimi, promoted from Aramco Pres last year, is what his Western advisers tell him: we have these zones, these people, these detectors, this response time, etc. Problem is, of course, that the plan assumes Western security operators who will follow orders and The Plan. They're not. They're Saudis and they have allegiances all over the map, with Aramco and the House of Saud likely near the bottom. Heh, I'll bet the PowerPoint presentation was pretty spiffy.
Posted by: .com   2005-02-09 5:28:04 AM  

#1  not according to bob baer who says port of ras tanoura or storage tanks at aqaiq are vulnerable to submarine or explosive boat attack or possible explosive drone hit--woolsey thinks coordinated aramco truck attacks or dirty bomb would do the trick--this saudi smegmahead is doin' regulation taquiyya for the kufr--sop
Posted by: SON OF TOLUI   2005-02-09 3:00:41 AM  

00:00