You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
U.S. Aims to Oust U.N. Nuke Official
2005-02-09
The United States is seeking backing from allies in a possible bid to oust the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency at a meeting later this month, diplomats and Western government officials said Wednesday. During the same Feb. 28 meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Washington also will increase the pressure on Iran for allegedly trying to make nuclear weapons, the officials told The Associated Press.

Washington considers IAEA head Mohammed ElBaradei too soft on Iran and its alleged plans to make nuclear arms and the international community ineffective in dealing with the same perceived threat. No U.S. comment was available for Washington's strategies for the upcoming IAEA board of governors meeting. But several diplomats and government officials from IAEA member countries dismissed recent reports that the United States had given up attempts to unseat ElBaradei because of lack of support from other countries. ``They've been lobbying, and close friends have given them a good reception,'' said one of those familiar with the issue, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Another said U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton and other senior State Department officials ``were still lobbying the capitals.''
Posted by:Fred

#6  Mrs D-It's enough to make ya toss your lunch, isn't it?
Posted by: Jules 187   2005-02-09 4:32:12 PM  

#5  We here at the Irrelevant Hall of Fame eagerly await your imminent induction.
Posted by: Blixie, Clarkie, Joe W. et al   2005-02-09 4:28:11 PM  

#4  The real question is: How relevant is the IAEA in the big scheme of things. If it is irrelavant, than who cares who runs the show? It is a sham anyway. If it can become relevant, then the issue of getting rid of al-Baradei is important.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-02-09 4:23:17 PM  

#3  ElBaradei was caught in an open mike situation....

Ummm... Isotope? U-235? Ummm... I don't know
about anything...


The photo?
No, I don't know which one is me....




????????????????????????????????????????????????

Posted by: BigEd   2005-02-09 11:33:39 AM  

#2  Sacrificing al-Baradei would seem to be a cheap concession for the frogs to make in this era of good feelings. But they'll still sell to the Chicoms.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-02-09 11:28:53 AM  

#1  And replace this idiot with who? Another UN functionary that will be more concerned with 5 star accomodations for him and his team?
I say leave it to the CIA and the Pentagon to tell us what we need to know with regard to the Mullahs intentions. The UN no longer serves any useful purpose.
Posted by: JerseyMike   2005-02-09 11:27:28 AM  

00:00